that's why my idea would be...
That's why my idea would be that all player's in top 16-20 would be semi pro's and all players in the top 5-8 would be pro's.
There would be other caveats, i.e. has to be a running 4 tourney average, etc..
That way there would be no way to finish high consistently and NOT be moved up and if someone HASN'T been playing(I know no player has ever been playing if you ask them) and they aren't doing well on the tour, they can be moved down. Starting ranking would be TD discretion, etc...
Jaden
It's a very attractive idea, except it would make the handicapping problem even bigger (i.e. more money at stake, the more likely people are to sandbag). Of course, the answer is always "a better handicapping system", but no handicapping system can outdo a person determined to cheat it.
That's why my idea would be that all player's in top 16-20 would be semi pro's and all players in the top 5-8 would be pro's.
There would be other caveats, i.e. has to be a running 4 tourney average, etc..
That way there would be no way to finish high consistently and NOT be moved up and if someone HASN'T been playing(I know no player has ever been playing if you ask them) and they aren't doing well on the tour, they can be moved down. Starting ranking would be TD discretion, etc...
Jaden