I'm sure men like Willis were superb with the money on the line, the testimonials of past greats speak volumes.
But I'll never believe that he was ever capable of winning a world championship tournament regardless of the reasons given for abstaining from them.
There have always been hustler type players who won legit championships, from Greenleaf, to Lassiter, to Reyes.
Since the money was so thin in the tourneys, it could be argued that those conditions presented even more pressure and an even greater challenge, but that's neither here nor there.
I've read accounts of old time ball players throwing balls on a line 400+ feet on a line (Hank Aaaron's bio if I'm not mistaken) and guys punting footballs 125+ yards, thing that simply cannot be done
Stuff just gets exaggerated over time, we know this.
What we don't know is whether or not a guy like Willis would have dominated a pro world caliber tourney the way he did the back rooms,
I submit that he would not