Question for Jay on Don Willis

smashmouth said:
you've missed the point entirely,

furthermore, since you make mention of Mosconi, he maintained an open challenge his entire career, now as the reigning world champ for over a decade, i would suggest that the onus would have been on everyone else to initiate a challenge

by your rationale, a terrific unknown golf hustler could claim superiority over Tiger Woods simply because Tiger never sought him out


Smash, I respect your opinion, but am not sure I agree. I seriously doubt Mosconi would have wanted any part of Don Willis in a money game. In actuality, Willis sought out the champions, even going so far as to attend the World Championships and observe the play.

From all I could gather, Willis was quite willing to tangle with ANYONE who was ready to gamble at any game on a pool table. He did not draw the line anywhere.

Mosconis "Challenge" was for a Challenge match of a format to his liking. Usually that meant 2,000 points for a set purse. In that format, I think Willie would have been the favorite because of his ability to make high runs.

Now if they played a shorter Race like 200 points and for more money, I think Don may have out "hearted" Mosconi. In truth and to give credence to your beliefs, no one really wanted to play Mosconi any Straight Pool, especially a long match.

Willis was much more interested in getting the Straight Pool champs to gamble at 9-Ball. I'm sure he would have traveled anywhere to get a game like this on. Bottom line, 9-Ball is more of a "heart" game. It takes guts to be a winning 9-Ball player.
 
Here's how I see some of the legendary hustlers,

If you were to take a a really really good pro at any point in history, whose speed is maybe just below the that of world champions,

and this pro, say someone today like a Warren Kiamco, were to focus soley on money matches, nothing else, from the time he was a teen, not only would he trounce everyone opponent he faced (99% of which would not be pros), but would ultimately have a very good shot against world champs in a money match format, more than a good chance in fact

he'd probably earn a hell of a reputation along the way too

now if some tournament great and world champion , say a Ralph Soquet, just won a hard fought championship after travelling halfway across the globe for a mere 20-30k, how eager do you think such a champion would react to risking his winnings against a top player in his own right and world class shark?

I recognize that guys like Freddy and Jay have a few years on me and have seen more than I ever will when it comes to pool matches, so ultimately their opinion on this matter should carry more weight

One thing I've been pretty good at all my life is distinguishing facts from hearsay, and later, through schooling, analyzing people and events in an objective manner

I love stories of men like Willis, they read like great fiction, but more often than not the claims don't hold up. Often times, you can make inferences simply from the sheer audacity of such claims. In Don's case, there isn't a single world champion table tennis player today who could beat any top high school player from a chair, so forget about him beating anyone halfway decent sitting down. One might infer that some of his pool claims were just as bogus.

The legendary Japanese Karate Champ Mas Oyama (google him) is revered to this day, years after many of his claims were proven bogus, actually, Martial Arts is full of characters who have swindled the masses for years with false claims but that's a different matter altogether.

I'm sure Willis was a damn good player, but I've always felt that comparing hustlers with world champs is disrespectful to the champs

end of rant
 
smashmouth said:
I'm sure Willis was a damn good player, but I've always felt that comparing hustlers with world champs is disrespectful to the champs

The reason there is any comparison between hustlers and world champions is because they co-existed and often played each other, especially in the 60's. The tournaments just didn't pay very well. Many players referred to tournaments as playing for he-haw. The main attaction at Johnson City was the back room and not the tournament room.

It seems that Willis was just looking for the best way to make money from his talents and realized that it wasn't in the tourneys. Could he have been a world champ? Doesn't matter. He just wasn't interested in finding out.
 
8ballEinstein said:
The reason there is any comparison between hustlers and world champions is because they co-existed and often played each other, especially in the 60's. The tournaments just didn't pay very well. Many players referred to tournaments as playing for he-haw. The main attaction at Johnson City was the back room and not the tournament room.

It seems that Willis was just looking for the best way to make money from his talents and realized that it wasn't in the tourneys. Could he have been a world champ? Doesn't matter. He just wasn't interested in finding out.
Very well said.
 
the thing that really grabs me about don willis and how good he must have been isnt so much what he said about himself, from what i read he really didnt talk his self up that much. But look at what the other greats of the time said about him. Lassiter, who i always thought from what i read was probably the greatest money player.....gives big props to Don, and i remember reading in a book somewhere that Don was one of the few people to beat lassiter. Then look at Harold Worst, who many players seemed to be scared of in a money game.....and he points to don as the greatest 9ball player he ever saw. You got 2 guys like lassiter and worst saying youre the best.....thats a hard resume to outdo.
 
I'll throw out something that might be interesting to some,

There seems to be a few UFC fans here, those who watched the inception of the promotion in 93 know that Royce Gracie popularized the sport with his style of Jiu Jitsu which his family in Brazil developed into their own fighting system over the past 80 years or so

The family champion for the past 25-30 years has been Royce's older half brother Rickson, not only is Rickson the family champion but he was without question the greatest grappler and practioner of BJJ the sport had ever seen, although during his tenure, there were very few competions of world class caliber(none really since the sport was really only practiced in Brazil) yet alone any official world championships

since then, the sport has grown by leaps and bounds and it's big tourney's have some truly world class fields with world class athletes

Rickson is around 50 now and to this day, the world's very very best Brazilian Jiu Jitsu practioners refer to him as the best and the greatest, often with a wink and a nudge when the reality is some of the guys now days would twist him like a pretzel or simply pick him up and drop him on his head

it's a certain type of respect that's just sometimes afforded to people who put in the work........
 
smashmouth said:
Here's how I see some of the legendary hustlers,

If you were to take a a really really good pro at any point in history, whose speed is maybe just below the that of world champions,

and this pro, say someone today like a Warren Kiamco, were to focus soley on money matches, nothing else, from the time he was a teen, not only would he trounce everyone opponent he faced (99% of which would not be pros), but would ultimately have a very good shot against world champs in a money match format, more than a good chance in fact

he'd probably earn a hell of a reputation along the way too

now if some tournament great and world champion , say a Ralph Soquet, just won a hard fought championship after travelling halfway across the globe for a mere 20-30k, how eager do you think such a champion would react to risking his winnings against a top player in his own right and world class shark?

I recognize that guys like Freddy and Jay have a few years on me and have seen more than I ever will when it comes to pool matches, so ultimately their opinion on this matter should carry more weight

One thing I've been pretty good at all my life is distinguishing facts from hearsay, and later, through schooling, analyzing people and events in an objective manner

I love stories of men like Willis, they read like great fiction, but more often than not the claims don't hold up. Often times, you can make inferences simply from the sheer audacity of such claims. In Don's case, there isn't a single world champion table tennis player today who could beat any top high school player from a chair, so forget about him beating anyone halfway decent sitting down. One might infer that some of his pool claims were just as bogus.

The legendary Japanese Karate Champ Mas Oyama (google him) is revered to this day, years after many of his claims were proven bogus, actually, Martial Arts is full of characters who have swindled the masses for years with false claims but that's a different matter altogether.

I'm sure Willis was a damn good player, but I've always felt that comparing hustlers with world champs is disrespectful to the champs

end of rant

You make a good point, and it may be true in many cases, such as if you're talking about a player who's Warren's speed. Very good as a money player and dangerous in tournaments too.

But it is the exception that proves the rule. The two exceptions I have seen in my life among gamblers were Don Willis and Jack Cooney. A possible third exception may have been Danny Searcy. These are notable gamblers who may have played a higher speed then the tournament champions. But I'll get back to them.

In fact, it could be argued that the opposite may be true! The very best players may well have been the gamblers. Remember that in Willis' day, the only big tourneys were Straight Pool and they could last for weeks with sparse prize money. Who played in these events? The players under contract to Brunswick and those with regular gainful employment. Expenses must have been high and the exposure would ruin a gamblers career.

What purpose could it possibly serve a pool player trying to make a living to play in one of these Championships, unless he was out for fame and glory? One reason Greenleaf was revered by his peers, was that he would go to the action rooms of his day and seek out the best players. I don't have any memory of hearing similar stories about Mosconi, Caras or Crane. They were tournament champions who got lucrative exhibition contracts and sponsorship.

I would argue that the absolute best pool players in the old days were "hustlers". Greenleaf claimed his toughest opponents were Andrew Ponzi and James Evans, both noteworthy gamblers. Even Lassiter did not take up tournament pool until he was in his late 30's and early 40's. He was doing far better as a gambler. He finally ran out of games. What tournament player of the 50's would have had a chance with John "Rags" Fitzpatrick. Try NONE! Same for Johnny "Irish" Lineen. These were the best players of their time, and the most feared and respected.

There were stories about Cannonball in the 50's going to the "white man's" tourneys and trying to make games. He was even willing to play these champions Straight Pool. And now we come to the case of "Canton" Don Willis. He roamed the country for more than three decades looking for anyone to gamble with him at Pool. Many did, many lost. Did he go to the towns where the tournament champions lived? You bet he did, hoping that he could get them to play. For the most part, they ducked him. They had nothing to gain and everything (reputation) to lose.

In my opinion Jack Cooney was the second best One Pocket of his time. Only Ronnie may have been a favorite over him. We'll never know. Jack was too busy making a much better living than any tournament player. I saw him play in his prime. He wasn't just a good player. He was a great pool player. PERIOD! And he occasionally tangled with other top players if the money was right. Trust me when I tell you that One Pocket was not his only game.

Finally there is Danny Searcy, another legendary folk hero. I personally witnessed him arrive at tournaments on the final day and issue a blanket challenge to all present. And these were 9-Ball players. Men like Sigel, Mizerak, Rempe, Hopkins and Howard. Only crazy ones like Louie Roberts would dare accept his challenge. And Danny shot him down in cold blood. I strongly suspect thet the only tournament player in the 70's who would have a chance gambling with Danny was Buddy. I make that match a toss up.

The same era gave us Greg Stevens, and I didn't hear about many tournament champions seeking him out. And everyone knew where he was and that they could bet sky high with him. So what is my point. I think I would like to show that the great and legendary "pool hustlers" should not be denigrated because they didn't win tournaments. If anything it may well be that the great tournament champions knew that they were overmatched.

To make a comparison from present day Poker. The best players are unquestionably the top gamblers. They absolutely love it when some tournament champion (like Phil Hellmuth) ventures into their game. They usually get eaten alive.
 
Last edited:
jay helfert said:
The same era gave us Greg Stevens, and I didn't hear about many tournament champions seeking him out. And everyone knew where he was and that they could bet sky high with him.

Jay,

Did you ever see Stevens play? I've had more than a few people tell me that when he was on (which would be for 2-3 days at a time when the mix was just right) nobody could beat him at 9-ball, including Lassiter.
 
Incentive to play in tournaments

Does anyone know what the grand prize was for the Johnston City All-Around finals? The tourney lasted 3 weeks. One week each for 1pkt, 9ball, and straight pool. The winners of each event met in the All-Around championship. The eventual winner received the lordly sum of $2000! Fats couldn't feed his dogs and cats for that 3 week stretch with 2K. It's true we old-timers tend to embellish on the good-old-days a little too much, myself included, but you can bet your bippy that Don Willis was all they say he was. Wimpy bragged on only two people, Eddie Taylor and Don Willis. In truth, looking at the, "mystery hustler can beat all of today's champions" story from a recent perspective would be ridiculous. There are so many tourneys, and so much money to win, an unknown commodity beating the champs of today would not make any sense. But the 40s, 50s and 60s was a different era. Check my previous post about Marty Stanovich, the Fat Man, who was earning six figures hustling golf in those days. When I speak of Willis, I aint talking second-hand, I was there. Nobody wanted to play him (except the monster Harold Worst, who did beat him on Harold's home court).
We had a ping-pong table at North Shore Billiards. I personally don't play table tennis, so I am not a good judge of player speed, but I have seen the great ping-pong hustler Quinn from New York beat many a player whilst sitting in a chair.

the Beard
PS I forgot, Wimpy bragged on one other guy, Spin The Ball George
 
Last edited:
Scott Lee said:
Jay...Jack White is only 75, and still going strong. Sadly, he lost his wife Mollie, of nearly 50 yrs, a year and a half ago.

Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com


I met him when I was 22 or 23. He hustled me one day in a poolroom in LA. It didn't turn out so good for him, but he took me to a couple of college campuses and put me in action. We made a little money and then he was off to do an exhibition somewhere. I never saw him again I don't think. A long, long time ago. But I never forgot him.
 
freddy the beard said:
Does anyone know what the grand prize was for the Johnston City All-Around finals? The tourney lasted 3 weeks. One week each for 1pkt, 9ball, and straight pool. The winners of each event met in the All-Around championship. The eventual winner received the lordly sum of $2000! Fats couldn't feed his dogs and cats for that 3 week stretch with 2K. It's true we old-timers tend to embellish on the good-old-days a little too much, myself included, but you can bet your bippy that Don Willis was all they say he was. Wimpy bragged on only two people, Eddie Taylor and Don Willis. In truth, looking at the, "mystery hustler can beat all of today's champions" story from a recent perspective would be ridiculous. There are so many tourneys, and so much money to win, an unknown commodity beating the champs of today would not make any sense. But the 40s, 50s and 60s was a different era. Check my previous post about Marty Stanovich, the Fat Man, who was earning six figures hustling golf in those days. When I speak of Willis, I aint talking second-hand, I was there. Nobody wanted to play him (except the monster Harold Worst, who did beat him on Harold's home court).
We had a ping-pong table at North Shore Billiards. I personally don't play table tennis, so I am not a good judge of player speed, but I have seen the great ping-pong hustler Quinn from New York beat many a player whilst sitting in a chair.

the Beard
PS I forgot, Wimpy bragged on one other guy, Spin The Ball George

Freddie,

First prize in each division was $2,000. Total prize money in each division was $10,000. The All Around paid $3,000 more with the winner getting $2,000 and second place $1,000. Thus the total purse of $33,000 for "only" three weeks. :)

Meanwhile in the back room, players were winning and losing four figure scores every night. Remember back then, they would play sets of 9-Ball or One Pocket for $200 to $500. $500 was a big bet. By the game, most One Pocket matches were $50 or a $100 a game. 9-Ball was maybe $30 or $40 a game. When Ronnie played Cokes they bet $200 a game, a really big bet! When Fats robbed Richie they were betting $300 a game!

This was the Pool economy back in the 60's. And that was big money then. A good job paid $100 a week.
 
Last edited:
PoolBum said:
Jay,

Did you ever see Stevens play? I've had more than a few people tell me that when he was on (which would be for 2-3 days at a time when the mix was just right) nobody could beat him at 9-ball, including Lassiter.

I saw him pay in Vegas and in Houston. He was a monster, but I don't think he could (or did) beat Buddy or Denny. Very few players wanted to mess with him. I saw him play Bernie Schwartz in Vegas, and Bernie finally won. Not many people know this name, but he was one of the best 9-Ball players in the country for a few years, before he got rich in ovenware. Bernie did some serious gambling at The Rack in Detroit also.

Bernie was from Pittsburgh and helped turn out Billy Incardona and Jimmy Marino, two of the best of their generation.
 
Last edited:
Jay,

how do you think these nine ball matches would have gone down, assume no backers, everyone plays with their own funds

Parica vs the top guys of the 80's in long money matches?

Efren vs the top guys of the 80's in long money matches?

Efren vs Parica in a long, extended money match over a few weeks?
 
smashmouth said:
Jay,

how do you think these nine ball matches would have gone down, assume no backers, everyone plays with their own funds

Parica vs the top guys of the 80's in long money matches?

Efren vs the top guys of the 80's in long money matches?

Efren vs Parica in a long, extended money match over a few weeks?

Parica beats everyone! And he did too!

Efren is the favorite over everyone except Buddy.

Parica beats Efren in 9-Ball until the 90's.
 
jay helfert said:
Parica beats everyone! And he did too!

Efren is the favorite over everyone except Buddy.

Parica beats Efren in 9-Ball until the 90's.

Jose Parica in the 80's may be the best pool player I ever saw. Including Lassiter, Worst, Buddy, Earl, Miz, Sigel, Ronnie, Efren, all of them. This is especially true for money! Jose took the game to another level that I hadn't seen previously. It was like he had the cue ball on a string. And he missed nothing!

Earl may have been more dangerous in tournaments, but he could not beat Parica for the cash!
 
Last edited:
I saw Jose beat Mark Tadd 11-10 for a grand here in Raleigh. This was around '91? Mark missed a straight in six ball when up 10-9, making it ten to ten. Jose then broke and made one of the toughest outs I'd ever seen, going up and down three times and getting perfect between two balls.
 
crawfish said:
I saw Jose beat Mark Tadd 11-10 for a grand here in Raleigh. This was around '91? Mark missed a straight in six ball when up 10-9, making it ten to ten. Jose then broke and made one of the toughest outs I'd ever seen, going up and down three times and getting perfect between two balls.

Jose didn't dog any balls! He made ALL the big shots!
 
Back
Top