Ronnie Alcano Charged With Rape...

sadly, the punishment for false accusation is not that severe. and in some cases, the accuser gets away with it! therefore, I accuse myself on having an affair with another woman. :D
 
Cuebacca said:
Exactly. If he is innocent, then the accuser should get prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Rape and molestation are two of the worst, if not the worst, possible crimes. For that reason, falsely accusing someone of these crimes should also be taken very seriously and punished severely. IMO, in certain cases, the punishment for that should be nearly as severe, or perhaps as severe, as that of the alleged crime.

WOW. I bet Kobe wish he had gotten this kind of support!
 
Fleece3 said:
WOW. I bet Kobe wish he had gotten this kind of support!
He did have "that kind" of support, but it cost him about $4M... Can you find his "support" in the picture below? note: there is a red hint...
 

Attachments

  • vanessabryant.jpg
    vanessabryant.jpg
    29.1 KB · Views: 545
In our local newspaper, the front page was talking about a soldier in his mid-20s being accused of kissing a 14-year-old girl. Apparently, he used to give her rides to school, which was not in her housing district. He isn't able to give her rides anymore so now she has to go to another school, where she is ineligible for the cheerleading squad. The day after it was discovered she was ineligible was when the allegations were made.
 
Sweet Marissa said:
In our local newspaper, the front page was talking about a soldier in his mid-20s being accused of kissing a 14-year-old girl. Apparently, he used to give her rides to school, which was not in her housing district. He isn't able to give her rides anymore so now she has to go to another school, where she is ineligible for the cheerleading squad. The day after it was discovered she was ineligible was when the allegations were made.

Change your f***ing avatar, that's disgusting and it's not work safe!!
 
Sweet Marissa said:
In our local newspaper, the front page was talking about a soldier in his mid-20s being accused of kissing a 14-year-old girl. Apparently, he used to give her rides to school, which was not in her housing district. He isn't able to give her rides anymore so now she has to go to another school, where she is ineligible for the cheerleading squad. The day after it was discovered she was ineligible was when the allegations were made.
---------------------

Really Marissa........

Your Avatar is in very poor taste.

I have been resistant to giving you grief but it is becoming apparent that you just enjoy being harassed. I don't enjoy playing "piling on" and see no value in it but I have kept an open mind concerning you but you are making the case of some of the other forum members for them.

Perhaps this is a banning offense. At the very least it is offensive.

You should go back to your oh never mind. Sorry.....
JoeyA
 
cuetechasaurus said:
Change your f***ing avatar, that's disgusting and it's not work safe!!

JoeyA said:
Really Marissa........

Your Avatar is in very poor taste.

I have been resistant to giving you grief but it is becoming apparent that you just enjoy being harassed. I don't enjoy playing "piling on" and see no value in it but I have kept an open mind concerning you but you are making the case of some of the other forum members for them.

Perhaps this is a banning offense. At the very least it is offensive.

You should go back to your oh never mind. Sorry.....
JoeyA
It is in response to every avatar I see of women bent over in thongs or bare-breasted in a wet tee shirt. It's two people kissing; there's no nudity or anything remotely sexually suggestive in it.
 
JoeyA said:
---------------------

Really Marissa........

Your Avatar is in very poor taste.

I have been resistant to giving you grief but it is becoming apparent that you just enjoy being harassed. I don't enjoy playing "piling on" and see no value in it but I have kept an open mind concerning you but you are making the case of some of the other forum members for them.

Perhaps this is a banning offense. At the very least it is offensive.

You should go back to your oh never mind. Sorry.....
JoeyA


poor taste? i've seen worse avatars on this forum than a couple guys kissing... its ok for some of you perverted pigs on here to post pictures of girls with their tits popping out of their shirt or sucking on banans but if a girl has an avatar with a couple gay guys everyones suddenly offended. give me a fuc*ing break.
 
branpureza said:
poor taste? i've seen worse avatars on this forum than a couple guys kissing... its ok for some of you perverted pigs on here to post pictures of girls with their tits popping out of their shirt or sucking on banans but if a girl has an avatar with a couple gay guys everyones suddenly offended. give me a fuc*ing break.
Tap, tap, tap!

Brian in VA
 
hmmmm . . . .

Sweet Marissa said:
It is in response to every avatar I see of women bent over in thongs or bare-breasted in a wet tee shirt. It's two people kissing; there's no nudity or anything remotely sexually suggestive in it.


Pardon me if I am a bit skeptical. This claim and the other claims of men being such sexist beasts in other threads don't quite ring true from the female who posts cheesecake pictures of herself and offers them for sell on the internet.

I have to agree with Joey. Your avatar is purely to provoke controversy and get you the attention which you revel in, good or bad attention it doesn't really matter.

Hu
 
ShootingArts said:
Pardon me if I am a bit skeptical. This claim and the other claims of men being such sexist beasts in other threads don't quite ring true from the female who posts cheesecake pictures of herself and offers them for sell on the internet.

I have to agree with Joey. Your avatar is purely to provoke controversy and get you the attention which you revel in, good or bad attention it doesn't really matter.

Hu
Um, what? I model on occasion, but take pictures for a living. I don't sell pictures of myself, only work that I shoot personally.

Now if you don't mind, this thread is about Ronnie Alcano's predicament.
 
Last edited:
Sweet Marissa said:
It is in response to every avatar I see of women bent over in thongs or bare-breasted in a wet tee shirt. It's two people kissing; there's no nudity or anything remotely sexually suggestive in it.

I agree that Marissa's avatar is in poor taste. Since Marissa mentioned it, her avatar is also sexually suggestive, and probably violates the rules for this forum.

To be fair, there are plenty of other avatars by other posters that are probably in poor taste too.
 
no longer posted

Sweet Marissa said:
Um, what? I model on occasion, but take pictures for a living. I don't sell pictures of myself, only work that I shoot personally.

I have only been on this forum a year or two. When I first came here your website featured "fine art" pictures of you. The captions said that they were available for purchase. I wasn't interested so I can only rely on the caption as to if they were actually for sale.

A dogpile search on your name tonight brought me to a site that advertises itself as a porn site and features videos. I didn't dig into the site to see if something you modeled for, worked in, or shot yourself was featured there.

Regardless, your defenses of the female sex and claims of being offended by cheesecake ring phony as a three dollar bill based on your past website, your past avatars, and your posts on the subject of the images of yourself prior to your last banning.

I personally don't feel that the cheesecake avatars belong here. However I am not hypocritical enough to pretend that they offend me. By the way, I was once a photographer also, mostly wildlife of another type.

(edit to comply with yours) I don't mind the thread getting back to the original subject at all. Your avatar derailed it. There is an obvious solution to that.

Hu
 
Last edited:
ShootingArts said:
I have only been on this forum a year or two. When I first came here your website featured "fine art" pictures of you. The captions said that they were available for purchase. I wasn't interested so I can only rely on the caption as to if they were actually for sale.

A dogpile search on your name tonight brought me to a site that advertises itself as a porn site and features videos. I didn't dig into the site to see if something you modeled for, worked in, or shot yourself was featured there.

Regardless, your defenses of the female sex and claims of being offended by cheesecake ring phony as a three dollar bill based on your past website, your past avatars, and your posts on the subject of the images of yourself prior to your last banning.
You are referring to my photo album at myphotoalbum.com, http://sweetmarissa.myphotoalbum.com. It is not my website. It is a way to park photos for free. My website is www.marissa-photo.com.

Also, I have NEVER had anything to do with pornography.
 
Sweet Marissa said:
It is in response to every avatar I see of women bent over in thongs or bare-breasted in a wet tee shirt.

Seeing those kinds of avatar doesn't justify your actions of doing the same deed. and besides, every sensible person with logic would clearly say that your avatar does illustrate a sexual behavior and catches a lot of negative attention. your reasons alone doesn't make weight nor does it give logic.

some people make some viable excuses out of clearly insensible matters. I could post an avatar here where I 'am holding my erect penis and just simply say that it's a way of showing my freedom of expression and it's not pornography. what I am saying is , atleast try to have a sense of dignity and change your avatar. it is not that much to ask for, is it? :confused:
 
Back
Top