Run Out Radio

Mark Griffin said:
I am on the currently running episode of run-out-radio. I have received a fair amount of e-mails from that. But would appreciate comments on what I said. Please make constructive criticism and try to KEEP ON TOPIC.

This has the basics of the PLAN for funding a pro series of events. I am working on the details and will need all the help I can get.

I am still trying to accumulate the names and contact info on the top 500-1000 players - men & women.

More info will be coming - but it is a month or so away. This is not going to be an easy deal so please be patient.

Mark Griffin
markg@playbca.com
702-719-7665 work

Originally posted on 06-02-2008, 12:54 AM

Mark, you invited comments about your interview here on the forums so here are mine.

You state in your Runoutradio interview that:


1. "Nobody else stepped up to do it" - "I just don't see anybody else doing it"

2. "Money paid back on the local level"

3. "A clear line from amateur to pro"

4. "You need everyone to get behind you on this"

5. "Sanctioning other events"

6. "No other player association"

7. "The system is already in place"

8. "Six events"

9. "Rankings for WPA system"

10. "I'll sell my car or sell my Harley"

Re. #1: "Nobody else stepped up to do it" - "I just don't see anybody else doing it" - Hmmm, have you ever heard of the ATS ? Basically, the proposal that I made to the BCA Board of Directors in Phoenix, AZ last February that you were in attendance at. I put a vague copy on May 9th of that proposal here on AZ. To help refresh your memory the link is here: http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=98527&highlight=professional+status

Re. #2: "Money paid back on the local level" - As I stated many times about the ATS, the regional tour money will still be paid back on a local level.

Re: #3: "A clear line from amateur to pro" - That sure sounds familiar. In fact it sounds like: Fundamental Purposes Of This Proposed ATS System A: To provide a clear path for all players to earn professional status in North America and to advance to the WPA events through the Associated Tour System as the governing body of cue sports in North America. As found here: http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=98527&highlight=professional+status

Re: #4: "You need everyone to get behind you on this" - Sounds familiar again. As in: Fundamental Purposes Of This Proposed ATS System D: To inspire everyone in the billiard community to support the Associated Tour System and its members. Again, as found here: http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=98527&highlight=professional+status

Re: #5: "Sanctioning other events" - Again, same as the ATS was set up to do. We discussed this several times at the board meeting on how the US Open, the Reno events or even Allen Hopkins events could be sanctioned through the ATS system.

Re: #6: "No other player association" - Again at the BCA board of directors meeting you asked me how the ATS would work with the UPA. I said it wouldn't bow down to any association like the UPA and if the players didn't want to play there would be many more waiting in line.

Re: #7: "The system is already in place" - You asked me how I would get all the systems in place. I told you the system was already in place with the existing regional tours.

Re: #8: "Six events" - Hmmm, Six Events. Something just like: The Associated Tour System (ATS), through the Viking, Joss and Tiger tours are seeking a total of 6 billiard room locations to host our $20,000 added ATS events. As seen here posted on May 10th, 2008: http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=98666&highlight=Room+Owners

Re: #9: "Rankings for WPA system" - And again, Fundamental Purposes Of This Proposed ATS System, Article A:
Player rankings from their participation in the ATS US Pro Tour will then allow them to move forward and participate as the North American contingents in WPA events.

Re: #10 "I'll sell my car or sell my Harley" - Wow Mark,,,, this one really hit home! You talk about promoters saying "I'll sell my car or sell my Harley". It reminds me of when I told you I didn't have as much funding as I needed but I would be willing to sell my Mustang and my Harley to get the start-up money to make this happen because I believe in a system like this that much and would be willing to put everyting I have on the line to make it work.


Honestly Mark, I love the fact that you are throwing money into the pro system but when you make the claims and statements in that interview that make it sound like, YOU HAVE THIS GREAT NEW IDEA and "NOBODY ELSE HAS STEPPED UP TO DO IT". And then I see soo many parallels to what I proposed and talked to you about, it makes me sick. Literally, it turns my stomach. Every night I think about the last 5 years I have worked on this system and how someone else that I have talked to and worked with on this system over these same years and had many recent conversations with about becoming a part of the ATS system, confided in and tried to have work with me on the ATS system is using the same fundamentals from the system that I put soo much hard work into toward their new system and making claims that they came up with this idea, well, it makes me want to.......grrrrrrr.

Anyway, I wish you much success with the new venture and I am rooting for it to succeed for the benefit of our sport.


Yours Truly,

Mj


UPDATE: Mark G. It appears that you have no morals at all. Your latest stunts of sending emails to my sponsors and to web site editors is exactly what you are known for, Back Room Politics with a Run and Hide little weasel attitude. Everyone "on the in" knows what you have done and who you are and how individuals with your record should be treated. I have remained silent and kept much of this under wraps for way too long but the next round will shine the light on you. Unfortunately the pro's mind you a little because of your monetary influence but I assure you they are talking. Especially about how you got some ideas that you call your own.

Good day.
 
Last edited:
Is there never any diplomacy ?

Here we go again!!! another flame war. Just what we need, at this point in time, for our faltering sport. The gloves are off now, go at it BOY'S.

Dick
 
SJDinPHX said:
Here we go again!!! another flame war. Just what we need, at this point in time, for our faltering sport. The gloves are off now, go at it BOY'S.

Dick

Can you blame Mike? He's been talking about this for quite a while now, then proposes it to the BCA, and suddenly a BCA member proposes what is paramount to the exact same thing? I would be pissed myself.
 
muttley76 said:
Can you blame Mike? He's been talking about this for quite a while now, then proposes it to the BCA, and suddenly a BCA member proposes what is paramount to the exact same thing? I would be pissed myself.

I don't believe Mark Griffin is a BCA board member, he owns the BCA Pool League... Not even close to being the same thing.
 
Didn't we learn anything from the civil war ?

muttley76 said:
Can you blame Mike? He's been talking about this for quite a while now, then proposes it to the BCA, and suddenly a BCA member proposes what is paramount to the exact same thing? I would be pissed myself.

Sir, I'm not blaming anyone, but does this need to be hashed out on a public forum ? And name calling should be left in the schoolyard, what happened to PM's and emails. Who cares about ideas or concepts. Neither Mike J. or Mark G. invented tournaments or leagues. Grady's rant may look mild when the smoke clears on this fiasco ! JMHO

Dick
 
DeadPoked said:
I don't believe Mark Griffin is a BCA board member, he owns the BCA Pool League... Not even close to being the same thing.

YES, Mark was a BCA board member at the time. I believe he was a on the BOD for a few years.

Mj
 
SJDinPHX said:
Sir, I'm not blaming anyone, but does this need to be hashed out on a public forum ? And name calling should be left in the schoolyard, what happened to PM's and emails. Who cares about ideas or concepts. Neither Mike J. or Mark G. invented tournaments or leagues. Grady's rant may look mild when the smoke clears on this fiasco ! JMHO

Dick

Yes it does need "hashed out" in a public forum. MG made public statements in a public radio interview that call for a public rebuttal.

Mj
 
For what it's worth, I did not mean to insinuate that Mr. Griffin stole Mr. Janis's idea. I have no personal knowledge of that. What I was saying is that if Mike feels it happened that way(which he obviously does), then he has a right to be mad. Sorry if I sounded accusatory, I didn't mean to-Matt
 
Hmmm. since I know where MG got many of his ideas from I often wondered how he thought up the new league / tour concept ?

This may shed some light if you do a little research.

http://www.universalpooleague.com/


No MG didn't come up with this idea either. He just borrowed it to put in with the mixed system he created like the master of all things pool he claims to be.

That's my opinion anyway.
 
MikeJanis said:
Yes it does need "hashed out" in a public forum. MG made public statements in a public radio interview that call for a public rebuttal.

Mj

Mike,

I actually did read your original post before you took it down. Now, after a few months, you decide to put it back up. Why? You've been awfully confrontational lately on this board and it seems like it's you against the billiard industry. What gives?
 
DeadPoked said:
Mike,

I actually did read your original post before you took it down. Now, after a few months, you decide to put it back up. Why? You've been awfully confrontational lately on this board and it seems like it's you against the billiard industry. What gives?

Honestly, I was content just leaving it alone. I took it down to try and work things out with MG but they never quite worked out. Then I completely forgot about it until he initiated contacts with some of my sponsors in an underhanded way last week.

Here: I posted this as an update to the thread on why I brought it back up.

UPDATE: Mark G. It appears that you have no morals at all. Your latest stunts of sending emails to my sponsors and to web site editors is exactly what you are known for, Back Room Politics with a Run and Hide little weasel attitude. Everyone "on the in" knows what you have done and who you are and how individuals with your record should be treated. I have remained silent and kept much of this under wraps for way too long but the next round will shine the light on you. Unfortunately the pro's mind you a little because of your monetary influence but I assure you they are talking. Especially about how you got some ideas that you call your own.


Obviously our negotiations didn't work out well but I never thought he would go as far as he did by trying to cut my sponsorship off through backhanded methods.

PS.. His tactics did not work well for him.

NOW, its on! And everyone can be dang sure I am going to take this as a very malicious act on MG's part.


Unfortunately I do not know the full extent of the damages he tried to inflict so it is evident that this needs to be dealt with publicly.

Mj
 
Last edited:
MikeJanis said:
Then I completely forgot about it until he initiated contacts with some of my sponsors in an underhanded way last week.

Mj

MJ,
I'm sure many are wondering how someone can "own" their own sponsors. I'd like a few.:smile: :smile: I guess I was thinking that in a capitalist society it was okay to compete. While I have seen your list, I did not memorize it. I'm assuming they are not permitted to sponsor anyone else??
 
Williebetmore said:
MJ,
I'm sure many are wondering how someone can "own" their own sponsors. I'd like a few.:smile: :smile: I guess I was thinking that in a capitalist society it was okay to compete. While I have seen your list, I did not memorize it. I'm assuming they are not permitted to sponsor anyone else??

Of course I do not own them and there is nothing wrong with anyone contacting them.

However, MG tried to use his influence to discredit me with my sponsors not gain them as his. He just didn't want them backing me in my new ventures with the ATS and BRRMA. He sent them a letter to the effect "I think you should know that, Mj this and that and you need to be aware of" .

Completely uncalled for, very unprofessional extremely vengeful, and not a real smart thing to do in this industry.

Oh, and did I mention that I am really mad now.

I mean really, MG has been extremely successfully in his business life, he has a lot of influential friends, all bought and paid for and he can pretty much start whatever new business venture on his own whenever he wants. But as soon as he learns a little guy like me has the funding needed to pursue a dream to organize our sport he wants to squash it instead of either stepping aside, helping out or just simply competing with it. Honestly, WTF was he thinking.

Mj

Mj
 
Last edited:
MikeJanis said:
Of course I do not own them and there is nothing wrong with anyone contacting them.

However, MG tried to use his influence to discredit me with my sponsors not gain them as his. He just didn't want them backing me in my new ventures with the ATS and BRRMA. He sent them a letter to the effect "I think you should know that, Mj this and that and you need to be aware of" .

Completely uncalled for, very unprofessional extremely vengeful, and not a real smart thing to do in this industry.

Oh, and did I mention that I am really mad now.

I mean really, MG has been extremely successfully in his business life, he has a lot of influential friends, all bought and paid for and he can pretty much start whatever new business venture on his own whenever he wants. But as soon as he learns a little guy like me has the funding needed to pursue a dream to organize our sport he wants to squash it instead of either stepping aside, helping out or just simply competing with it. Honestly, WTF was he thinking.

Mj

Mj
Mike, you really are not doing yourself any favors here. If you have such a good idea and solid plan just go do it. If it is a superior plan implemented, promoted and managed better than any competion you will succeed. Don't b!tch in public about things that you should be able to deal with in private. If your plan requires everyone in the industry to blindly follow your lead with no questions asked or objections made then you are drawing dead anyway.

I consider Mark a friend. He was the first and ONLY guy to step up with HARD CASH when we asked for support for our first event. There was no ulterior motive. He did not want anything up front or on the back end other than for our event to be a success. I have since found him to be one of the most stand up guys I have encountered in this industry. I have done plenty of business with Mark and will do more in the future because in all honesty he is one of the few I trust.

You seem to have made a habit out of lashing out at anyone who doesnt go your way. I think it detracts from your long record of hard work building the most succesful regional tour out there.

As far as the emails,believe it or not, some people may not see everything the same way as you do and will take what actions they deem proper to make their point of view known. Running here and telling your side of the story complete with righteous indignation is petty and in the end useless to your cause IMO. Handle your business in private where it belongs.

Calling one of the best guys in the game a "weasel" is nothing more than showing your ass and just plain bullshit.
 
?????

MikeJanis said:
Originally posted on 06-02-2008, 12:54 AM

Mark, you invited comments about your interview here on the forums so here are mine.

You state in your Runoutradio interview that:


1. "Nobody else stepped up to do it" - "I just don't see anybody else doing it"

2. "Money paid back on the local level"

3. "A clear line from amateur to pro"

4. "You need everyone to get behind you on this"

5. "Sanctioning other events"

6. "No other player association"

7. "The system is already in place"

8. "Six events"

9. "Rankings for WPA system"

10. "I'll sell my car or sell my Harley"

Re. #1: "Nobody else stepped up to do it" - "I just don't see anybody else doing it" - Hmmm, have you ever heard of the ATS ? Basically, the proposal that I made to the BCA Board of Directors in Phoenix, AZ last February that you were in attendance at. I put a vague copy on May 9th of that proposal here on AZ. To help refresh your memory the link is here: http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=98527&highlight=professional+status

Re. #2: "Money paid back on the local level" - As I stated many times about the ATS, the regional tour money will still be paid back on a local level.

Re: #3: "A clear line from amateur to pro" - That sure sounds familiar. In fact it sounds like: Fundamental Purposes Of This Proposed ATS System A: To provide a clear path for all players to earn professional status in North America and to advance to the WPA events through the Associated Tour System as the governing body of cue sports in North America. As found here: http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=98527&highlight=professional+status

Re: #4: "You need everyone to get behind you on this" - Sounds familiar again. As in: Fundamental Purposes Of This Proposed ATS System D: To inspire everyone in the billiard community to support the Associated Tour System and its members. Again, as found here: http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=98527&highlight=professional+status

Re: #5: "Sanctioning other events" - Again, same as the ATS was set up to do. We discussed this several times at the board meeting on how the US Open, the Reno events or even Allen Hopkins events could be sanctioned through the ATS system.

Re: #6: "No other player association" - Again at the BCA board of directors meeting you asked me how the ATS would work with the UPA. I said it wouldn't bow down to any association like the UPA and if the players didn't want to play there would be many more waiting in line.

Re: #7: "The system is already in place" - You asked me how I would get all the systems in place. I told you the system was already in place with the existing regional tours.

Re: #8: "Six events" - Hmmm, Six Events. Something just like: The Associated Tour System (ATS), through the Viking, Joss and Tiger tours are seeking a total of 6 billiard room locations to host our $20,000 added ATS events. As seen here posted on May 10th, 2008: http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=98666&highlight=Room+Owners

Re: #9: "Rankings for WPA system" - And again, Fundamental Purposes Of This Proposed ATS System, Article A:
Player rankings from their participation in the ATS US Pro Tour will then allow them to move forward and participate as the North American contingents in WPA events.

Re: #10 "I'll sell my car or sell my Harley" - Wow Mark,,,, this one really hit home! You talk about promoters saying "I'll sell my car or sell my Harley". It reminds me of when I told you I didn't have as much funding as I needed but I would be willing to sell my Mustang and my Harley to get the start-up money to make this happen because I believe in a system like this that much and would be willing to put everyting I have on the line to make it work.


Honestly Mark, I love the fact that you are throwing money into the pro system but when you make the claims and statements in that interview that make it sound like, YOU HAVE THIS GREAT NEW IDEA and "NOBODY ELSE HAS STEPPED UP TO DO IT". And then I see soo many parallels to what I proposed and talked to you about, it makes me sick. Literally, it turns my stomach. Every night I think about the last 5 years I have worked on this system and how someone else that I have talked to and worked with on this system over these same years and had many recent conversations with about becoming a part of the ATS system, confided in and tried to have work with me on the ATS system is using the same fundamentals from the system that I put soo much hard work into toward their new system and making claims that they came up with this idea, well, it makes me want to.......grrrrrrr.

Anyway, I wish you much success with the new venture and I am rooting for it to succeed for the benefit of our sport.


Yours Truly,

Mj


UPDATE: Mark G. It appears that you have no morals at all. Your latest stunts of sending emails to my sponsors and to web site editors is exactly what you are known for, Back Room Politics with a Run and Hide little weasel attitude. Everyone "on the in" knows what you have done and who you are and how individuals with your record should be treated. I have remained silent and kept much of this under wraps for way too long but the next round will shine the light on you. Unfortunately the pro's mind you a little because of your monetary influence but I assure you they are talking. Especially about how you got some ideas that you call your own.

Good day.

Mike, I am not going to come on here and try and discredit you but bring up a few points.
1) You keep digging yourself a bigger hole. It seems like you keep getting into AZB confrontations with every promoter who is not you.
2) To call Mark G a weasel, in my opinion is being a weasel yourself. Mark has done more for pool than anyone in the past few years. When he hosted the Qlympics he paid every dime promised even though the tournament was a monumental flop. He bailed out everyone when it came to the Desert shootout. The money added to the tournament he promotes are self funded, not through novelties given to the room owner that would never sell. Let me ask you, would you pay on your own dime for any money added? Never mind dont answer that. I think we all know the answer.
3) If you've been talking about this magical plan to save pool for 4 years then Mark is right. No one is stepping up. You merely have been talking for four years.
4) People have been banned from AZ Billiards for calling names and being argumentitive. To come on here and attack Mark G or someone of his stature should merit a 1 year ban.
 
chris_williams said:
Mike, I am not going to come on here and try and discredit you but bring up a few points.
1) You keep digging yourself a bigger hole. It seems like you keep getting into AZB confrontations with every promoter who is not you.
2) To call Mark G a weasel, in my opinion is being a weasel yourself. Mark has done more for pool than anyone in the past few years. When he hosted the Qlympics he paid every dime promised even though the tournament was a monumental flop. He bailed out everyone when it came to the Desert shootout. The money added to the tournament he promotes are self funded, not through novelties given to the room owner that would never sell. Let me ask you, would you pay on your own dime for any money added? Never mind dont answer that. I think we all know the answer.
3) If you've been talking about this magical plan to save pool for 4 years then Mark is right. No one is stepping up. You merely have been talking for four years.
4) People have been banned from AZ Billiards for calling names and being argumentitive. To come on here and attack Mark G or someone of his stature should merit a 1 year ban.

Chris, you have some valid points and some a little off target. I can not discount what MG has done because he did it and he put up his own money. So I will simply agree on all those facts.

Re: #3. Pay a little closer attention. Talking about it was just a step. You may not have noticed that we had to finish our current sponsorship agreements which end in Sept before we could start our new ones. This changeover is evident in our current structural changes with the Viking Tour and the release of the info for the ATS starting Sept. 12th, 2008. many discussions are all over AZ about these changes.

Re: #4. I don't know anything about the ban plan but my responses are in line with the persons in question and are only responses to their statements and actions.

Re: other promoters/tours. Chris there are hundreds of promoters/TD's and many, many tours. You only here me speak out in replies and or out of frustration about the bad ones. I will not bring the other good tours, TD & Promoters names into this thread but if you do a little research you will see that I respect and honor those good ones.

Mj

Respectfully,

Mj

Re
 
In life, more good comes from conflict in the long run than none at all. Many on this forum are afraid to state their beliefs/opinions about others who 'supposidly' know more, or are more involved or whatever. Speaking out is healthy, taking the safe road in life too me is not ""living"".
Clint Eastwood said "playing it safe in life is whats risky, nothing new comes out of it". So if Charlie Williams can draw his ball better than me now because he's younger...then I should not speak against him when he's out of line??? I too have some issues with MGs' ways, as I did very early on with MJ in one of his early/first events. He made a few mistakes, learned and has grown to be the most important COG in the evolution of the sport at the semi pro level. When was the last time you saw Randy G. rock the boat?? I remember when Jam jumped down my throat when a friend of hers tried to compare Kieth to Minnesota Fats and I totally disagreed. She defended her friend and why did she go after me, because I stated my opinion against her friend. Conflict brings out the best, thats life in a nutshell. If its too hot in the kitchen, go on the porch.
 
Mike,
I have appreciated your efforts to build a very nice pool tour and have said so on more than one occasion.

I don't appreciate you calling Mark Griffin a weasel or any other names.

Mark Griffin is a respected member of the billiard community and continues to put his money where his mouth is and you shouldn't be calling him derogatory names especially on this forum for any reason.

Your posts are "malicious" in regards to MG.

I understand business as well as the next entrpreneur and know that it is difficult to establish yourself in the world. You've already done a pretty good job of that. There will always be people who are competing for your turf. Whether MG is competing for your turf, ideas or reputation is immaterial. Attempting to discredit your competitors is a sure way to lose support from your own customer base in my opinion.

I hope that you will put this behind you and put your effort into expanding your pool tour without trying to knock someone else off the ladder especially in a public forum where you have many supporters.

Your success will not be enhanced by an attempt to discredit a respected member of the and billiard community.

Continue to improve your product and services and that will be the true mark of your success.

Wishing you and your new and successful Amateur Tour even greater success.

JoeyA
 
Just my 2 cents....

Mark Griffin is FAR from a weasel. Maybe one of the smartest guys in all of pool. This whole thread sounds like sour grapes. Lots of crying. MJ didn't invent pro tours, tours, or pool models in general. These models / concepts have been around for a long time.

There are those who talk and those who execute. MG is an "executer" plain and simple. Don't like Mark? Out-execute him. Talking never made anyone any money except for Howard Stern and Oprah. Both of which, by the way, have the 6-out.
 
Back
Top