Excellent post. Wasn't going to comment on the "free" events but your post made me rethink my position. I'm a three cushion fan. Sort of play but at a much lower level than the competitors. Went over to the area with our sfleinan and sat down. Watched some very talented players. Strange, when one made a particularly difficult shot, the spectators just sat and watched. Sean and me began to applaude their efforts. A few others began to do the same. Just seemed sad so few people showed their appreciation for the players efforts.
In my mind, even worse, was there was no way to tell who was who. Yes, there was a board up showing the entered players and their scores. But who were the competitors at the tables? Mentioned it to the director. He seemed to be shocked I didn't know. Suggested some form of name plates at the table so spectators would know. Seemed like such a simple thing! Could have been so much better.
Lyn
Lyn:
Absolutely! I think there was a lot of "disjointedness" around the expo, a lot of due to mindset (e.g. the 3-cushion event not having name placards by the tables so that people can identify the players by more than just "recognition"). For the tournament director to give us the funny look as he did when you recommended the name placards, shows a mindset issue -- his seeming impression that one should just "know" the players by sight (i.e. recognition) shows a closed mindset issue. It's a shame that this mindset exists, because it's this very mindset that is a significant obstacle to a sport / discipline gaining new fans. How is 3-cushion going to get new fans -- which, correct me if I'm wrong, is the reason why Allen is having this event at SBE in the first place -- if the mindset of the people working the event isn't conducive to attracting new fans?
But as rayshooter says, there was also a lot of disjointedness due to more than just mindset, but rather oversight.
The 3-cushion board was this little tiny thing mounted on a beam just behind the 14.1 booth, and if you got more than two people looking at it, the aisle was blocked. This was obviously not thought out -- an impromptu / ad-hoc thing.
I think his idea of a centralized scoring board for all events is a great idea!
Another problem I think was pervasive at the expo, was COMMUNICATION amongst the security staff. For instance, as you know, I played in the Open 10-ball event. After I lost my final match on the B side, I wanted to watch the players that were still in it. The "Pro" badge for this event is an automatic VIP entry in it. That goes without saying, and has been historically true for as long as Allen have been having the Open 10-ball event. So I'm able to just show my Pro badge, and allowed into either the VIP or bleacher side of the arena. I spend the rest of my time at the expo manning the 14.1 Challenge booth, enjoying the expo itself, and occasionally walking into the Pro arena to catch a match here and there.
But then comes the quarter- and semi-finals, and there's new people manning the security entry point into the Pro arena. I wanted to watch the match between Stevie Moore and Darren Appleton, and I show my Pro badge. I'm immediately turned away, saying that I have to purchase a pass specifically for the Open 10-ball event! I couldn't believe my ears. I looked at them, and reinforced the fact that I *played* in this event. They ask me, "oh you played in an event?" I said no, I played in *THIS* event, pointing to the Pro arena itself and then to my badge. They discuss amongst themselves, and then say, "ok, but you must go over to the bleacher side of the arena." I'm a bit confused at this sudden change of rules (obviously because these people are new and don't know what they're doing), but I comply, not wanting to make a scene. I go to the bleachers side, and when I look over at the VIP tables on the other side of the arena, there's like only 10 or 15 people in the whole VIP area! It looked a ghost town over there, but yet the bleachers side was packed, almost standing-room-only. I couldn't for the life of me understand why a Pro that played in the event, was suddenly not allowed over to the VIP side of the arena.
It's roughly analogous to playing a part in a Broadway show, and after you finish your part in the play, you leave the stage. Afterwards, you go to the seating area in the theatre, because you want to watch your fellow actors in the play, but are told that you can't, and have to go back out to the ticket booth to purchase a ticket to the event -- even though you were an actor in the play itself!
This is obviously a communications issue, and looking back with a more lucid mind
(rather than an emotional one -- I was *really* mad at the time), I can see that it was just one of those many little things due to Allen's crew having to focus on more serious things, like the new venue itself, and other things falling by the wayside.
(Allen or Allen Jr.: if you're reading this, the communications between the security personnel and the show staff needs a little work. The idea of not allowing [or of placing significant restrictions upon] an Open/Pro player to watch his/her own event, is a HUGE oversight.)
But again, I understand the huge logistical nightmare of moving an event of this magnitude to new facilities (I worked behind the scenes of some well-known computer trade shows at the Jacob Javitts Center in NYC, so I truly "get it"). And I also believe that Allen & crew will take the feedback from this and other issues, and address them. It's all part of the growing pains.
-Sean