deanoc said:i have never seen a serious player playing a gina,joss west,searing,tascarella or many others in the last 20 years..
Mmm.. I think Chao Fong Pang uses a Gina.. :embarrassed2: Please correct me if I'm wrong..
deanoc said:i have never seen a serious player playing a gina,joss west,searing,tascarella or many others in the last 20 years..
Very good point and I doubt that a lot of people know this. I think Bob Runde wanted to get into more custom style cues and when he had the chance to move away from Schon for a profit and make what he wants when he wants to he did. I've owned Schon cues and I think they are good and I've owned a couple of Runde's custom cues and I like them also. A Schon will do what ever you want to do in pool, but it's classified as a production cue by most people so the custom cue guys want something more than a Schon. I currently own an ivory pointed Bob Runde cue that I like a lot, but I don't think it pockets balls any better than a nice Schon cue!Matt_24 said:Does everyone know that Evan Clarke was making the cues at the same time as Runde......so the Runde era was also the Clark era.
Does everyone also know that the first pantographed cues (round points, inlays, etc) were done by Runde as well?
deanoc said:as far as i know many world chapionships have been won with schon cues,seems to me johnny archer played his best with his ,which was not runde era,james walden one of the greatest money players went to court to get his clark era cue back when a traveling companion took it.i can't tell you how many great players i have seen playing schons in tournament and money games,but if i were to guess ,it would be more than any other.
i have never seen a serious player playing a gina,joss west,searing,tascarella or many others in the last 20 years,i have owned several ginas and joss cues that i traded schons for because the players liked my clark era schon more than they did their joss east or gina cues. i am talking about trading even.i have even turned down trades for the schon i was playing with for a stroud joss.
Now i am not saying these cues have no value,they do.But if i were in a serious game i prefer schon to play with,and i prefer the new ones to the old.Jack Potter told me that he thought i was right too,and he knows cues,he made the LIBRA cues.
Now i have had schons that didn't play so good as the others but that is wood,mytery of wood,but if i had to bet i would take 10 schons and the hit would be consistent.
after market sales and return on investment can vary,sometimes. i made profits,sometimes i lost money when i sold them,I always had a funny habit if i lost money with a cue gambling ,i sold the cue because it was a loser.i bought another schon,the hit was always close and got back on track.this kept me from thinking i was a loser,so if you want a good buy on a cue just wait till i lose,it will be firesalw time
oh at the present time i am playing the deano that was on thr az,i don't even own a schon but its not because i don't want one,i have been trying for months to get evan to make me an ebony box cue and he keeps stalling.truth is i want mitred points or corners and he keeps explaining that his new technology makes them better now than ever,he ask me questions like do i think a 57 chevy is better than a new one etc.i know that there are people on az who think they really know cues but if anyone knows more than evan i would be surprised ,especially when it comes to schons i think the new are the best buy for the money.
You are correct and I didn't mean to imply that it was the hit of the old Schon vs the new for Alex. But Alex could afford to put any butt on that predator shaft and chose to stick with his R-12.Matt_24 said:Alex uses a 314 on his Schon anyway......
coryjeb said:UMMMM...... SO....... don't buy a Schon then????:shrug:
oldneo said:I would change the joint to an ivory joint and the pin would be a brass radial and change the shafts to ivory ferrules also for whatever reason Rvan or his crew decided that it would be a good idea to glue the weight bolt in, the cue is ass end heavy I would like the weight a little more forward balanced other than those things it's beautiful cue.
So that's what I'm considering doing to me the cue would have a better feel to it, thanks for all the post great information in here, also for the gentleman that said don't buy a schon back then I didn't know any better if I had known then what I know now I would never had bought that cue.
Evan is definately proud of his work as he should be. I think it bothers him that the early cues are so popular amung collectors.deanoc said:truth is i want mitred points or corners and he keeps explaining that his new technology makes them better now than ever,he ask me questions like do i think a 57 chevy is better than a new one etc.i know that there are people on az who think they really know cues but if anyone knows more than evan i would be surprised ,especially when it comes to schons i think the new are the best buy for the money.
Doug said:Out of curiosity, if 12 cues were painted solid black with three of them being early era Schons and nine the present day Schons who would bet they could hit balls and pick out the three early era ones and how much would you bet? Further, using the same analogy but substituting three similar cues but made by a different cue maker(s) who would bet they could pick the three non Schons and how much would you bet and will those wanting to bet be at Derby City?
That's because you paid retail when you bought it. If you look hard enough you can find Schon cues for 40% off retail or even more.oldneo said:...you would think that if you paid say 1500.00 for a schon limited you might get something in the 900.00 range but you can't if your lucky you might get 500.00.
This is why many manufacturers can exist and succeed in the same market.Only ERO's said:The values of Schons:
Most of the previous posts are the reasons I have gone away from using a Schon. I bought my first one, a SP-49 for $300 used it a few years and sold it for $400. Then I moved into the Elite. I bought it for $840 and sold is a few years later for $800.
I now shoot with a Joss West. I figure the cues are fairly compariable but the JW would hold its value. Now, I am tempted to sell the JW and move elsewhere. I carry a Joss sneaky pete in my trunk and use that whenever needed. A Joss and Schon hit pretty much identical and you can save a lot of money but purchasing a plain Joss. You won't lose as much money this way either.
Who on here do you think could identify 1 older spliced point Schon butt mixed in with 9 newer Schon butts if the butts (all of the same weight and balance point) were say, wrapped in brown paper so they could not be seen, and the same shaft were used on all 10 cues? And Im not talking about a 1 try thing.... if its so distinguishable that it could be easily done, maybe take that 1 in 10 chance and repeat the results 5 times..... or more with perfect results (the person picks the spliced point cue)..... shouldnt be a problem should it?JB Cases said:I'd bet that there are a few people who could do it. But we have had this discussion in another thread and it's really all about personal preference.
IF there were no difference then people wouldn't be saying there is one.
srs314 said:This is why many manufacturers can exist and succeed in the same market.
I really like Schon cues old or new to me they have always manufactured a great product.
I know from talking to Alex that the reason he loves his Schon is that the balance and weight are perfect FOR HIM plus he is very picky about the thickness of the grip. Mostly it has value because it was a gift from one of his best friends. Alex could win Championships with a variety of different cues but he had found one at that time to stick with. He is now involved with Fury and using one of their cues.
Anytime you're in a rush to sell a cue it's difficult to break even on the retail value considering it's used. Schons seem to hold their value and are very popular, thus are the easiest to resell.
In case no one noticed lately the market and economy have been pretty crappy over all.