Tate:
I never said you said I made that counterfeit. I clearly said you said you "thought" it may be one of my earlier cues. It is not one of my cues. I never built that cue.
To set the record straight: I have never forged anyone's signature on a cue. I have never knowingly made a copy of another man's work either.
I have on my site two times, when I made an inlay that another man first made and in both cases, I wrote who did the original inlay. I gave them credit. That is normal in the world for people to do, but not normal for counterfeiters of fine cues.
To imply that I might have placed another man's name on my work or forged another man's signature is the same as casting doubt on me. I do not like it . . . . and at the same time I am not interested in a feud going here.
I do not recognize the cue, but it looks to be a Filipino-made cue. The inlays look to be a dead giveaway of work done in Manila or in Pampanga province. I could be wrong. I would be interested in seeing the joint pin of the cue. The black rings look to be regular cheap nylon plastic, not double linen phenolic. If those black rings are black plastic then the man that counterfeits my cued also counterfeited that cue and forged the "Motley" signature. The joint pin would most likely tell who made the cue. I am going to guess a bullet type end and a thread of 5/16-18 or 3/8-16 for the counterfeiter I am thinking of if the cue is older than 5 years . . . . but I could be wrong since seeing the cue and handling it would give a more clear picture of who built it. If the cue is 1 to 3 years old then the pin will be a 5/16-14 or 3/8-10 for the counterfeiter I am thinking of.
The counterfeiter i am thinking of now copies the end of my joint pins. Oh, i decided to go back to that thread and i now see the joint pin. I would and am about 85% certain it is made in one of two shops. One in angeles city and the other in the manila area. Again, without the cue in my hand I could be wrong.
Back to your post at:
http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=193347&highlight=queperfect
Think it over some, Tate. You said you thought it could be some of my earlier work. The signature on the cue, I think was stated, was that of Mr. Motley. So . . . to say it might be some of my earlier work is to imply I might have forged another man's work after making s counterfeit of his cue. I would hope that you can understand my feelings in this matter?
Zinzola, you implied piercy might not be from America. What country is he originally from? I think I may already know, but want to be sure.
Piercy, I am not interested in a flame going here with you either. I have set the record straight on my scrimshaw work and hope you just let it be at that information provided by me in my previous post.
I hope this is the end of these two matters and the record is set straight.
QP Cues