1. Point on the surface of the cue ball.
2. Angle and pitch of impact vector.
3. Velocity of impact vector.
Curious... does anybody believe that there is anything OTHER than these three responsible for setting the cue ball in motion?
What are they? What is YOUR opinion?
EDIT:
Thanks guys... from the discussion so far we've identified the four dominant components that a player can modulate (at shot time) that have the most influence on cue ball trajectory. These are:
1) tip position
2) tip angle/pitch
3) velocity
4) bridge length
If you shoot the same shot, with the same bridge length and similar velocity, it is the tip position and angle/pitch that will most influence the cue ball trajectory.
So, would you agree that precision of #1 and #2 is the absolute most important part of pool shotmaking consistency, above all else? Would you agree that all the effort of good fundementals leads to simply, precise spatial delivery of the tip?
If you don't agree, why?
2. Angle and pitch of impact vector.
3. Velocity of impact vector.
Curious... does anybody believe that there is anything OTHER than these three responsible for setting the cue ball in motion?
What are they? What is YOUR opinion?
EDIT:
Thanks guys... from the discussion so far we've identified the four dominant components that a player can modulate (at shot time) that have the most influence on cue ball trajectory. These are:
1) tip position
2) tip angle/pitch
3) velocity
4) bridge length
If you shoot the same shot, with the same bridge length and similar velocity, it is the tip position and angle/pitch that will most influence the cue ball trajectory.
So, would you agree that precision of #1 and #2 is the absolute most important part of pool shotmaking consistency, above all else? Would you agree that all the effort of good fundementals leads to simply, precise spatial delivery of the tip?
If you don't agree, why?
Last edited: