I have a $1300 unwrapped Scruggs & a $290
unwrapped Shurtz. Very, very similar in my mind.
I really like them both. Great feel to them.
unwrapped Shurtz. Very, very similar in my mind.
I really like them both. Great feel to them.
Snapshot9 said:in 45 years of playing, I've had many occasions, to hit with a few cues by famous cuemakers, not for any length of time, but to just get the nickel tour of them. The old Joss's (much better than current ones, IMO), bushka's (was too forward weighted, and shaft too fat for me), Anderson's, old Palmers, and a few older Southwests.
I have a friend who has an older Southwest, about a $2800 one, probably go for $3300+ today with nice inlays on it (not one of the overpriced plain ones), and I compared it directly to my $1,100 Shurtz cue. I could not hardly distinguish a difference between the cues at all. The Southwest did not have fat shafts. The hit was almost undistinguishable. My Shurtz had a hard hercules layered tip, the Southwest had a hard Moori tip. The hit and feel on both cues felt good to me, but the most noticeable difference, which was minute, was the balance of the cues. My Shurtz was a little more forward balanced(19"), where it felt like the weight was evenly distributed inbetween my grip and bridge than the Southwest was.The Southwest balance felt slightly more towards my grip hand a little.
Overall, I felt more comfortable with my Shurtz, although I would not been unhappy with the Southwest. Like I said, the differences were very small overall. I may have been slightly prejudiced, but I really did try NOT to be, and maintain a 'scientific' type attitude when evaluating them.
I do have to state though, the Southwest had a regular butt, my Shurtz has a slimline butt.
It, did however, make me appreciate my $1,100 Shurtz cue all the more.