Professional pool should be careful. It could organize itself into oblivion and total irrelevance.
You're assuming it hasn't already... I think the goal is to get it out of total irrelevance!
Brian
Professional pool should be careful. It could organize itself into oblivion and total irrelevance.
i usually stay out of this stuff, but i have one thing to add
I think a players assosiation should really be looked at as a 2 way street.
the assosiation could be used to look into tournys and protect the players payouts and interest.
but
i think it would work ever better, if the assosiation would require as part of its "membership" a gaurentee from it players/members to either paly in a certain number of sanctioned tournys and/or atleast certain specific tournaments. I think on a Non-mega event scales it would be easier to get places to hold events/add money if the organization could say to a potential tournament/host, "if you do these things to get sactioned and protect our players, than i can gaurentee x amount of pros or i can gaurentee these top palyers will be here"
seems like it would be easier to get some money added once these places our gaurenteed some of the larger "draw" players
Ruark,
That is exactly my point. Pool won't sell out 80,000 seats and it won't command $100,000 a minute for a commercial. So why is everyone's plan call for a big "Sponsor"? The only way a big sponsor comes in is as an "Advertiser", and they won't come in without 80,000 seats filled!
Pool needs to generate a much smaller scale system that grows from the bottom. It needs to start with the people already playing pool, and grow that crowd. We need to bring in consumers that don't currently play pool. If you go to a bowling alley here is Dallas, they have 48 lanes tied up with leagues every night of the week! Many nights they have 2 sessions! These people are spending $16.00 average just on league dues, not to mention what they eat and drink.
Why don't those people play pool?
When we have 1,000,000 players getting together every week to play pool, then we have a fan base to show the pro pool talent to. Most of the income in NASCAR does not come from selling 80,000 seats! Granted, allot of it comes from TV production, but what keeps the drivers and teams going is merchandising. For every one person that can go to a race, there are thousands that can buy a $40.00 T-shirt with their favorite driver on it.
I just think that when we have an audience, the big advertisers will come find pool. Until then, we need to build a foundation, an audience.
By the way, my father grew up in Evant, TX! I have been there many times before my grandmother passed several years ago. I remember getting old fashioned soda's at the drug store down town when I was a kid.
Royce Bunnell
www.obcues.com
Try applying to a non pool player for a job involving a lot of trust and/or the handling of large sums of money and tell him your favourite outside working hours leisure pastime is playing pool down your local pool hall and see if you can finish the sentence before he says 'we'll let you know' and shunts you out the door :smile:
The thing about bowling is is that there are these big bowling alleys out there, in the right markets. I know that a lot of bowling alleys have closed down over the years, but now it seems that in many big markets, there' still one good sized place for the bowlers to play.
I have often though that what pool *really* needs to grow is have around a half dozen great pool rooms in different geographic areas. These would need to be nice, good sized rooms with standardized equipment, and room for spectators. IOW. rooms that can function as pool room, learning center for the local schools, a social event locale, AND tournament and league venue. Perhaps a room in SF, one in LA, another in Dallas, KC, St. Louis, Dayton, or Louisville, one in Florida, and another up on the northern east coast.
I think from this circuit of well designed rooms, you could grow the sport, hold tournaments for amateurs and pros, eventually get sponsorship for a tour, and maybe even get on TV. But the way the majority of rooms out there are now set up, this can't work. And carting tables from hotel to casino isn't going to work either -- those are single shot events.
Pool needs a basic infrastructure of rooms across the country, to go anywhere, IMO.
Lou Figueroa
Lou,
I like the idea, but I have one big question. What is going to change, besides having a room like this here in Dallas, to bring more people to the game of pool?
The problem is that no investor or business is going to shell out the 2 million (or more!) dollars it would take to open such a room without having at least a reasonable belief that it would make money. If you look at the people playing pool right now in Dallas, they would not support a room like that. We have successful chain in Texas called Fast Eddies. They won't open a room in Dallas!
We have to figure out how to get more "Pool Enthusiasts". People who go out and play pool for fun, and expect to spend $50.00 each night doing it. Right now we have "Pool Players". People who go out and expect to make $50.00 doing it. They don't eat or drink in the rooms they hand out in. They don't want to play table time. They hound all the "Pool Enthusiasts" about gambling every time they walk through the door!
The bowling alleys here in Dallas are full of league players all week! They pay more to bowl in leagues than pool players pay for pool leagues! They also get less money back, and they are still full. Bowling obviously has something that pool doesn't. Or maybe pool has something that bowling doesn't, something that keeps them at the bowling alleys instead of the pool rooms.
Royce Bunnell
www.obcues.com
I agree that financially it's stretch, but to begin, someone needs to think outside the box of what a pool room has always been.
To everyone except committed enthusiasts it's a boring spectator sport.
A pool players association isn't going to be able to alter the fundamental problem that the game (which game?) is mind numbingly boring for 99.99% of the world.
Furthermore ordinary recreational pool players simply aren't awed at the playing ability of pros. They see it as a very simple, easy to learn game
(What game are you talking about....8 ball-9ball-10ball-1pocket-banks-straight pool-or some other game) that anyone can become competent at in a few hours. :smile:
here is what I don't really understand. When We go out on the road to do exhibitions weget crowds that exeed 200 people. thats for three hours in a place like Sturtevant Wisconsin. Notsaying anything bad about sturtevant bit its not a big place. Thats withjust two top pros. So I guess youcan get more people there it mayjust bea format thing to make it interesting. to the casual player. Ipersonallylovethe Mosconi Cup and will watch that more that the US Open final.Everything's relative but if you are talking about spectators when you really get down to it there's no such thing as "large draw" pool players.
How many spectators at Galveston...75? How many at a million dollar IPT event....100? Can't get much bigger potential "draws" than were there. Even competing pros generally don't stay to watch finals after they've been knocked out.
Recreational pool players aren't playing because they love to "watch" pool. They are playing because they like to do something while out drinking or because they like actually "playing". There's no automatic direct correlation between enjoying playing and enjoying watching so it isn't a question of finding a way to get these untapped wells of potential money spenders to take an interest in pro pool or get them along to tournaments........that's not going to happen.
To everyone except committed enthusiasts it's a boring spectator sport and many of those committed enthusiasts aren't able to make it to most events anyway. A pool players association isn't going to be able to alter the fundamental problem that the game is mind numbingly boring for 99.99% of the world and that even the other 0.01% have lots of alternative sports and interests competing for their time and attention in this new fast paced modern world, far more so than when Minnesota Fats was around.
Furthermore ordinary recreational pool players simply aren't awed at the playing ability of pros. They see it as a very simple, easy to learn game that anyone can become competent at in a few hours. As for the non pool player they simply see it as an environment to keep their children a million miles away from and/or see pool players in general as low-life.
Try applying to a non pool player for a job involving a lot of trust and/or the handling of large sums of money and tell him your favourite outside working hours leisure pastime is playing pool down your local pool hall and see if you can finish the sentence before he says 'we'll let you know' and shunts you out the door :smile:
here is what I don't really understand. When We go out on the road to do exhibitions weget crowds that exeed 200 people. thats for three hours in a place like Sturtevant Wisconsin. Notsaying anything bad about sturtevant bit its not a big place. Thats withjust two top pros. So I guess youcan get more people there it mayjust bea format thing to make it interesting. to the casual player. Ipersonallylovethe Mosconi Cup and will watch that more that the US Open final.Everything's relative but if you are talking about spectators when you really get down to it there's no such thing as "large draw" pool players.
How many spectators at Galveston...75? How many at a million dollar IPT event....100? Can't get much bigger potential "draws" than were there. Even competing pros generally don't stay to watch finals after they've been knocked out.
Recreational pool players aren't playing because they love to "watch" pool. They are playing because they like to do something while out drinking or because they like actually "playing". There's no automatic direct correlation between enjoying playing and enjoying watching so it isn't a question of finding a way to get these untapped wells of potential money spenders to take an interest in pro pool or get them along to tournaments........that's not going to happen.
To everyone except committed enthusiasts it's a boring spectator sport and many of those committed enthusiasts aren't able to make it to most events anyway. A pool players association isn't going to be able to alter the fundamental problem that the game is mind numbingly boring for 99.99% of the world and that even the other 0.01% have lots of alternative sports and interests competing for their time and attention in this new fast paced modern world, far more so than when Minnesota Fats was around.
Furthermore ordinary recreational pool players simply aren't awed at the playing ability of pros. They see it as a very simple, easy to learn game that anyone can become competent at in a few hours. As for the non pool player they simply see it as an environment to keep their children a million miles away from and/or see pool players in general as low-life.
Try applying to a non pool player for a job involving a lot of trust and/or the handling of large sums of money and tell him your favourite outside working hours leisure pastime is playing pool down your local pool hall and see if you can finish the sentence before he says 'we'll let you know' and shunts you out the door :smile:
There needs to be a organization that looks for the needs of pool in general and not just for those that want to just make money.
<snip>
My daughter, her serinor year, was able to take a bowling class and I wonder why not pool also.
<snip>
Sad as it may be, years ago when my father was summoned to be on jury duty, they asked about his occupation and he was dismissed from jury duty as a result of being a professional pool player... even with World Titles, he was still not deemed suitable for Jury duty... which I guess could be considered a good thing though
I think they asked if he had ever "Purposely deceived someone as to the extent of his ability in order to profit from them" or something like that.... I actually kind of like that story, I guess thats what sets many poolplayers apart from the mainstream, they enjoy the "underside" that pool involves.
As if the lawyers and judges don't do the same thing, but it's OK if it's on a golf course.
here is what I don't really understand. When We go out on the road to do exhibitions weget crowds that exeed 200 people. thats for three hours in a place like Sturtevant Wisconsin. Notsaying anything bad about sturtevant bit its not a big place. Thats withjust two top pros. So I guess youcan get more people there it mayjust bea format thing to make it interesting. to the casual player. Ipersonallylovethe Mosconi Cup and will watch that more that the US Open final.
The other thing is we can never really get much more people at a arena to spectate cos its hars to see the game from afar I found myself watching a match in Galvaston and could not follow the game cos I could not see what balls were what. So watching live is tome always going tobe limited.
Before Griffin chews my ass I will getback on topic. What is exactly stopping Mark Griffin from doing this? I am not knocking him or putting him on the spot but there has to be reasons that he is not jumping into this full force. It is as most of us all agree what the sport needs not only for the players but for the fans. I guess it would boild down to the following.
1) Money
2) player and fan support
3) Industry support
4) promoter support
5) Knowing that you may be spending time, money and resourses on something that the players will not support for one reason or another.
I think if it is packaged right and the players to begin withcan see the benefit long and short term they will get on board. This would have to encompass things like a optional benefit plan, some kind of tournament insurance in case a promoter does not come through, and the sactioning fee actually going towards what it should and that is making sure that the money for the players is there and can't be touched and help in promoting and marketing the events. Not just going into the organizers back pocket and slapping a logo on the events posters. There is so much to do and planning to make this a great product and organization. Just the set up before anyone is told about it is prob $20kor morejust tohave someone work on it with no guarentee it will work. Anyway, my vote forwhat it is worth is still with Griffin tobe the man for the job or at least behind the job
The High schools in my district even offer bass fishing!There needs to be two things happen for pool to survivie.
1. More people playing
2. More places to play
Without these, pool will not go anywhere. Ever wonder why the other sports are popular? I have and there are two things that come to mind.
1. Sports such as football, baseball, soccer, golf and so on are played in schools and after schools, and have PEE WEE leagues and such. Wouldn't a inter school pool league be nice. My daughter, her serinor year, was able to take a bowling class and I wonder why not pool also.
2. Cites have sports faculites for these sports and but few have any pool equipment. Why not?
Unless there is a increase in the playing base, pool will not go anywhere.
And if there are no family friendly type places to play, the player base isn't gonna get any bigger.
There needs to be a organization that looks for the needs of pool in general and not just for those that want to just make money.
Pool has a bad rep for being played in seedy places by shady people who smoke and drink alcholic beverages and hustle and gamble and sandbag and otherwise act in an antisocial manner. Bowling and all other sports of course have none of these elements and are generally associated with going to church and clean living and scholastic achievement. :wink: