SJM Thoughts on Matchroom's New Event

filler got the virus

the problem with a true round robin is that with 7 players, in the last match some of them will have nothing to play for, no reason to win. i didn't understand the point with this format until the last match of the last session where albin played niels and albin needed the win and niels needed to win 5-0. even that was tense.
I'd go with six players in each group and eight groups. That way you have sixteen players left after the group stages, which is now perfect for single elimination. But what do I know anyway?
 
While I might have posted in the thread on this event, I have so many thoughts on the just-completed Matchroom event called the Championship League Pool that I decided to start what is only my second thread in the last fourteen months. My intent is to compare notes with others that watched the event.

My Thoughts on the Championship League Pool Event

I saw a lot of this event on DAZN and will share my thoughts. To finish on a positive, I'll cover the negatives first, but in the final result, the event was a triumph.

Negative 1: A Not Very Elite Field
By WPA Rank, 8 of the world’s Top 20 players are Asian. Not one of those 8 was in the field. By Fargo, 12 of the world’s best 20 players are Asian. Not one of those 12 was in the field. Of course, COVID figured here, but I hope 2022 will bring a more internationally balanced, more elite field. When interviewed by Mike Howerton, Emily Frazer expressed commitment to revising Matchroom’s field filling rules to assemble the most elite fields possible. I’m Emily’s biggest fan, but I feel she didn’t deliver on that commitment. Of course, there were extenuating circumstances, including COVID and the controversy concerning the sponsor patches, but this was disappointing. I’ll keep an open mind and hope this is resolved for the 2022 event.

Negative 2: The Group 1 Advantage
Seven players got preferred treatment they didn’t earn. For example, Kazakis (WPA #9, Fargo Rate 800) had a stronger case for inclusion in Group 1 than Melling (WPA #27, Fargo 784). Matchroom indicated that next year, inclusion in Group 1 will be on merit, but I feel it was mishandled this year.

Negative 3: The Round Robin is Almost Time Wasted
If you need only be in the top four of seven to get to a group semi, where top finishers have no edge, round robin matches are not very important. I see why some would just advance the top finisher, but I don't mind having the top four reaching group semis under different conditions. For instance, if the top seed got two on the wire in their semi and the second seed got one on the wire in their semi, the round robin would be more important.

Negative 4: Not Enough Alex Lely in the Booth
Boyes is certainly a decent commentator, but Alex Lely is far better, offering more insightful, more accurate analysis of the play.

Positive 1: Short Races and Golden Breaks Count
I love short races. Errors are magnified, offering Mosconi-like tension. Even group semis and finals are races to five. Golden breaks count, too!

Positive 2: The Inclusion of Top Women
I love the fact that top women were in the mix, though disappointed that they were all European. Of course, for all I know, some non-European women were invited and declined.

Positive 3: Tough Equipment
I was pleased when Matchroom set up the equipment tough at the 2020 Mosconi Cup, befitting elite players. They did the same at this event.

Positive 4: Matches Have Referees that Rack the Balls
Our sport has always fared best when there's a referee and when that referee also racks the balls. Matchroom gave us this.

Positive 5: Short Breaks Between Sessions
Nobody does it like Matchroom. The breaks between matches are very short, ensuring that the excitement is maintained for the length of every session, I’ve often attended events that had some long breaks between matches on the stream table. That never sits very well with me.

Positive 6: Innovation
I'm OK with the format as a novelty. Variety has a place and I applaud Matchroom for trying something that's new to pool.

Positive 7: Incremental Investment in Pro Pool
Matchroom, pool's top event producer, has, through the conception of this new event, increased its investment in pro pool, and that's good for the pros. Thanks are also due to Predator, the event's title sponsor.

In Conclusion
The field was not super-elite, the draw gave unearned preferences to some, and too little rode on round robin results. That said, the positives greatly outweighed the negatives, and Matchroom gets very high marks for their new production. Thanks to all at Matchroom for a job especially well done. The conception and execution of a new event at this troubling moment in history is a remarkable achievement and reminds us, once again, that it is Matchroom that sets the standard in our sport.

What were your impressions of this event?
Positive #8...your write up.

You're good. I'm gonna get me a stu for my house. Should probably get one for work too.
 
Stu, good analysis, but I would add the Aramith Black ball sets used to your negative column - in my opinion the number one negative.

I realize it’s all about $ as Matchroom has a deal with Aramith to use their balls for all Matchroom pool events. Why not just use the extremely popular Aramith Tournament ball sets as opposed to the highly criticized and not nearly as well selling Aramith Black sets?

The orange/pink 4-ball and purple 5-ball are nothing less than ridiculous, in addition to the black and yellow 9-ball. It’s bad enough that they come up with a new colors like the brown 7-ball, but to change existing colors like the purple 4-ball to now a purple 5-ball, I would love to hear an explanation as to why that makes any sense?
I hate them for TV. Aramith seems to be pushing them hard though!
 
I hate them for TV. Aramith seems to be pushing them hard though!
I don't much care for the colors, but I prefer them to the Cyclop colors.

I think the yellow/black nine ball really makes the nine stand out. The regular nine is easier to confuse with the one ball.

I can live with the colors if it means we will have more well-organized, well-paid pro events.
 
I don't much care for the colors, but I prefer them to the Cyclop colors.

I think the yellow/black nine ball really makes the nine stand out. The regular nine is easier to confuse with the one ball.

I can live with the colors if it means we will have more well-organized, well-paid pro events.
I also have to agree with this sentiment. They can do what they want to the ball colours so long as we get a consistent line up of professionally produced events.

That said, the pink and purple trip me up every single time. I always forget which is the 4. It's the most difficulty I've had with new colours.
 
... the problem with a true round robin is that with 7 players, in the last match some of them will have nothing to play for, no reason to win. ...
Some money was on the line. In Days (Groups) 1-7, only the last-place (7th) finisher won no money. 6th place won $700, 5th place won $900. Not big money, obviously, but worth trying to do your best in a short race to 5. And maybe the money will get better in future years.
 
I'd go with six players in each group and eight groups. That way you have sixteen players left after the group stages, which is now perfect for single elimination. But what do I know anyway?

not a bad idea, because a single elim last day instead of a winner's group would be more exciting to watch imo
 
One positive for Matchroom is they are able to really churn plenty of content (192 hours) at very low production cost. I am guessing around $1.5 to $2K per hour. That is fraction of big production Mosconi Cup which I think is in range of $25K to $30K per hour. No doubt they probably can only sell it for peanuts to content companies like DAZN since pool content fetch dirt cheap prices. But they should still make some money with sponsorships and no gate revenue. And that can only be good for pool.
The format is big negative. So many flaws. Besides Group 1 advantage, weaker players play later by which time top players who are in Group 1 have already qualified so last few days featured relatively weak groups. Viewership in last few days of round robin must be lowest. The prizemoney should also not reward those from early Group 1 or 2 who are still around in later groups. For eg. there should be rule in round robin stage that you can only win money in first 4 days, after that you don't win any money. So they will be forced to qualify fast. Final day was also anti climax. You expect different format or slightly longer race especially in semis and finals
 
I enjoyed this Matchroom production quite a bit. The short races show just how important the lag shot is, just like in the Mosconi Cup. The one thing that got my attention is the lack of dry breaks. It seemed like the wing ball went in every single break. I am sure it didn't but it went with uncanny regularity. In the future I look forward to this event again with some tweaking here and there I believe it will be a winner!

Great synopsis by sjm as I have come to expect!
 
One positive for Matchroom is they are able to really churn plenty of content (192 hours) at very low production cost. I am guessing around $1.5 to $2K per hour. That is fraction of big production Mosconi Cup which I think is in range of $25K to $30K per hour. No doubt they probably can only sell it for peanuts to content companies like DAZN since pool content fetch dirt cheap prices. But they should still make some money with sponsorships and no gate revenue. And that can only be good for pool.
The format is big negative. So many flaws. Besides Group 1 advantage, weaker players play later by which time top players who are in Group 1 have already qualified so last few days featured relatively weak groups. Viewership in last few days of round robin must be lowest. The prizemoney should also not reward those from early Group 1 or 2 who are still around in later groups. For eg. there should be rule in round robin stage that you can only win money in first 4 days, after that you don't win any money. So they will be forced to qualify fast. Final day was also anti climax. You expect different format or slightly longer race especially in semis and finals
Spartan, I was wondering if you ever filled out that spreadsheet with all the winnings etc., and if so, wonder if you could post it here. It was a terrific way to get a sense of the overall match. It was so good that I thought Matchroom should provide something like that on their page. A great way to summarize the groups.
 
Spartan, I was wondering if you ever filled out that spreadsheet with all the winnings etc., and if so, wonder if you could post it here. It was a terrific way to get a sense of the overall match. It was so good that I thought Matchroom should provide something like that on their page. A great way to summarize the groups.
There you go :)

clp11.jpg
 
Thanks for that, Spartan. When 8 of 19 players make $5,000 or better, that's a really nice payout. Bravo to Matchroom.

The more I think about this event, the more I like it.

As Matchroom has promised that next year, inclusion in Group 1 will be merit-based, the existence of this event will be just another incentive and reward for the pursuit and attainment of excellence, just like the World Pool Masters.

A gradual return to merit-based invitations to the big events in our sport serves it well, and will help to ensure that more of the world's elite players make a decent living from pool.

Matchroom is marching our sport in the right direction. Let's all hope that the elite players are smart enough to support them as they follow this path. There were, of course, extenuating circumstances, but an event this elite should never lack all of the world's top three players (JL Chang, Josh Filler, SVB). I'm guessing it will never lack them again.
 
Last edited:
Matchroom is marching our sport in the right direction. Let's all hope that the elite players are smart enough to support them as they follow this path. There were, of course, extenuating circumstances, but an event this elite should never lack all of the world's top three players (JL Chang, Josh Filler, SVB). I'm guessing it will never lack them again.

Covid may fade away, arguing about patches won't...given Matchroom are consistent with their approach in snooker (and have been for years) I suspect that is for the players to think about (people can argue whether thats right or wrong, but its likely to be the case regardless)!
 
Covid may fade away, arguing about patches won't...given Matchroom are consistent with their approach in snooker (and have been for years) I suspect that is for the players to think about (people can argue whether thats right or wrong, but its likely to be the case regardless)!
I noticed that with Billy Thorpe, the most prominent patch on his shirt was for Meucci, with the smaller Predator CLP patch on the other side.
 
I noticed that with Billy Thorpe, the most prominent patch on his shirt was for Meucci, with the smaller Predator CLP patch on the other side.
Hopefully then it shouldn't be a problem for the others next year (and in any other Matchroom events where there is a conflict).
 
I thought it was great. Group 1 should be seated on Merit of do a lottery...more drama and something to watch.
 
Back
Top