VIProfessor said:I would like to weigh in on the side of armed self-defense. While no one in their right mind ever wants to have to use a firearm for self-defense, we've got to recognize the nature of the times we live in. All too often, even giving up the money will not save your life, as many of the young thugs will shoot you anyway to avoid leaving a witness or, tragically, just for the thrill of it.
If you travel the roads and you carry significant amounts of cash, you should be prepared to defend your life by any means necessary. As for me, if it comes down to the nitty gritty and flight is no longer an option, I'd rather be judged by twelve than carried by six.
Russ Chewning said:Yeah Steve,
A lot of people I have met have this pie-in-the-sky mentality when it comes to guns. They think that banning all guns will solve the problem. As the well known saying goes: If we criminalize guns, then only criminals will have guns. Thus making the rest of us automatic targets.
And a note to the person that thinks I am screwed up because I'd have no problem killing a person, look at it from my perspective. I personally don't believe there is some being up there with a "master plan". So, within that world view, I have no problem executing violent persons. The quicker the better. None of this nansy pansy 20 appeals. If we could execute those condemned to the death penalty within a month, that would be the best thing for society as a whole. We get rid if some worthless scum, and don't have to pay for them to sit in a prison cell for 20 years first.
Like I said, absent of a "Great Master Plan".. Some people just need killin'. Our society seems to be getting further and further away from this core concept, and as a result, we have more crime.
Congrats, society.. You earned it..
Russ
JoeW said:200th Prisoner Cleared Through DNA Testing
Posted: April 26, 2007
Jerry Miller, a former army cook who spent nearly 25 years behind bars for a crime he did not commit, became the nation's 200th person freed from prison or death row through DNA testing. The first DNA exoneration in the U.S. took place in 1989. Thirteen years later, the number of freed inmates reached 100, and just five years after that, it doubled. "Five years ago, people said that the number (of exonerations) was going to dry up because there just weren't many wrongful convictions. But clearly, there are plenty of innocent persons still in prison. There's no way you can look at this data without believing that," said Barry Scheck, co-founder of the New York-based Innocence Project that assisted Miller and helps other prisoners seeking to prove their innocence through DNA evidence.
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/
I just finished teaching a class on victimology about 10 minutes ago but thought that some of the people who believe in "shoot them all and let God sort it out," might think on this for a minute -- and these mistakes are after a long jury trial usually with eyewitnesses. I maintain you do not want to be on either end of a weapon !
[
JoeW said:200th Prisoner Cleared Through DNA Testing
jay helfert said:It's always struck me as a huge contradiction that Barry Scheck is using DNA testing to free wrongfully convicted men. He was part of the "dream team" that got O.J. off, claiming the DNA testing was flawed. Maybe he had a gulity conscience.
I was in the courtroom the day the forensic examiners were explaining DNA testing procedures, and the chances of the blood sample belonging to anyone else but O.J. was over six billion. More people than there were on the planet at the time.
Slider said:That's the way the law used to read about 20 years ago, however I believe that it has changed, and things are more complicated. If you are anywhere around the state capitol, and you are caught with a gun and ammunition within easy reach of one another, you are in deep trouble.
I used to have a problem with driving and drowsiness myself. I was never comfortable dozing in more public areas, lighted or not, since they tend to attract roving bunches similar to the group you encountered. My preferred spots were in nice, quiet residential neighborhoods (preferably with hills) and I would park facing uphill. The grade of the roadway, combined with reclined seat, made for a very comfortable nap, with no stiff neck afterward. A good jacket or blanket is a must - a car can cool off fast on a chilly night. Having the seat reclined also makes you much less conspicuous—to the "good" guys and bad guys.
Food for thought - a sword is defined by the California Penal Code as a non-concealable weapon, as are firearms over a certain length.
I'm with Russ on this.i have seen and heard about too much crime and am fed up with the punks.they can meet their maker if they mess with the innocents and have fun with Satan for all eternity...thrasher789 said:I disagree with you on alot of things Russ and this is most certainly one of them. I can't believe you or anyone could suggest the death penalty for a crime that dind't cause a death, it's not even an 'eye for an eye' (and I don't follow that principle either).
That said don't get me wrong, I don't hate you or anything and I got nothing but love for those fighting for our country so I have alot of respect for you, but I disagree wholeheartedly with you on this point.
Russ Chewning said:So what if we "wrongfully imprison" a few people? Most of the time, criminal histories come into the picture when people get lengthy prison sentences, so I very much doubt very many of those released under these new findings were very good people.
And again, if a "kill em quick" policy was put into place, and these people are truly innocent of ANY wrong doing, well we just help speed em on their way to "God". Good on yah!
Russ
jay helfert said:Thanks guys for the kind words. I'm glad it was only a scare. I guess things are getting uglier out there. I've slept in my car dozens of times, and the only other time someone woke me was a highway patrolman checking to see if I was okay.
I used to be a scrapper, but don't feel up to it anymore. Hey, I'm not a kid either. I've owned guns all my life, but NEVER shot anyone yet. In fact this is only the third time I was ready to use one. A policeman friend of mine in Bakersfield told me something years ago I never forgot. He said don't take out a gun unless you are prepared to use it.
Somehow in that spot, the little .22 seemed awfully small. But I definitely would have used it if they got one of my doors open. I will think twice next time, before I park anywhere at night. I actually thought I was in a good spot to sleep undisturbed.
thrasher789 said:I disagree with you on alot of things Russ and this is most certainly one of them. I can't believe you or anyone could suggest the death penalty for a crime that dind't cause a death, it's not even an 'eye for an eye' (and I don't follow that principle either).
That said don't get me wrong, I don't hate you or anything and I got nothing but love for those fighting for our country so I have alot of respect for you, but I disagree wholeheartedly with you on this point.
JoeyA said:I also don't believe Russ has said he is a soldier fighting for our country's interests but since you have assumed that perspective maybe Russ can elaborate on this further and settle it once and for all.
Our soldiers deserve to have the distinction separating them from U.S. civilians working in the Middle East even though it takes a pair of coconuts to do so.![]()
JoeyA