Stevie's CTE video

What is so difficult to understand about it? Your perception gives you the rough line, your visuals fine tune that line to the exact line you need. That is why you can use the exact same visuals on that 5 shot drill. You have a different perception for each shot, but the exact same visuals for all five.

And, it is the exact same thing Stevie is doing in the video, and that Stan has taught all along.


There's nothing difficult here Neil. I will use your theory here for the half ball hit.
If I start out at 30 degree's and work my to 45 degree's with the 5 same line ups that have been discussed. Make all 5 and used the 1/2 ball hit as my first visual, whats needs to happen for me to be successful?
 
There's nothing difficult here Neil. I will use your theory here for the half ball hit.
If I start out at 30 degree's and work my to 45 degree's with the 5 same line ups that have been discussed. Make all 5 and used the 1/2 ball hit as my first visual, whats needs to happen for me to be successful?

Forget the half ball stuff. Just find your rough line to stand on to pocket the ball. That is called your perception. Then, use the visuals to fine tune that line and then do your sweep. The combo of the visuals and the sweep are what put you on the exact line you need to be on.
 
If you're going to make CTE work, one of the first things you have to do is quit thinking in 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, etc hits.

Try this with those 5 shots. I personally find the B a little easier to hit those shots with than the A or C (depending on which direction you're cutting the ball). Let's say you're going to cut to the left. Line up where you are seeing zero overlap, you're seeing it behind the CB straight into the OB. Now, start edging left until you see a perfect 1/2 ball OVERLAP. This is not a half ball hit at all because you are offset. Instead of looking for points on the two balls, try to see the line you would look down to have the 1/2 ball overlap. This is your perception, that line you're looking down. Now, come into the CB with your cue aligned 1/2 tip to the right of CCB. Fix your bridge, pivot 1/2 tip to CCB, shoot.

With that said, I don't think you'll really appreciate the magic of the perception unless you use CTE, ETA or ETC. Instead of shooting all 5 positions, try one position to the furthest right or furthest left. Cut one right, then cut the next shot cut one left. These are at the two extremes. If you can start to actually see the perception line on both of these shots, you'll be along way down the road to understanding how the perception line changes and it isn't a subconscious adjustment in the least.

What Neil is telling you about alignment is correct. This helps get you to a position where you can best see the actual perception and move into the shot properly with minimal movement. Stan does this so automatically, it is why he is able to move through the process so fast and smoothly.

If you're even 1/2 as good a player as you've presented yourself to be, you should begin to get this with a reasonable amount of effort. If you don't, either you've misrepresented your skill level and/or you're not trying and simply trolling. I tend to believe the latter but I'd like to give you the benefit of the doubt.
 
I am fairly sure that you just contradicted Stan.

He said that the ETB with a thickening pivot would overcut Shot #5 & I found that to be correct even though it was closer to the pocket than the ETA with a thinning pivot.

You've just made a good case for CTE being more subjective than objective.

Sorry, but I no can discuss.

Edit: I made an error regarding the pivot, Stan actually said an inside pivot. I guess the thickening pivot was on my mind has I had shot the shot with that pivot to give it a try. Sorry for the mistake.
 
Last edited:
I am fairly sure that you just contradicted Stan.

He said that the ETB with a thickening pivot would overcut Shot #5 & I found that to be correct even though it was closer to the pocket than the ETA with a thinning pivot.

You've just made a good case for CTE being more subjective than objective.

Sorry, but I no can discuss.

Still trolling, huh?

No contradiction. He is 100% correct

I thought you were supposed to MOVE ALONG.

Stan Shuffett
 
I am fairly sure that you just contradicted Stan.

He said that the ETB with a thickening pivot would overcut Shot #5 & I found that to be correct even though it was closer to the pocket than the ETA with a thinning pivot.

You've just made a good case for CTE being more subjective than objective.

Sorry, but I no can discuss.

You brought this up before. I told you before you were wrong. You're still wrong. You're fairly sure?. Find it and quote it. You know damn good and well he didn't say that, once again, you're just trying to stir the shit. Wtf is wrong with you?
 
You brought this up before. I told you before you were wrong. You're still wrong. You're fairly sure?. Find it and quote it. You know damn good and well he didn't say that, once again, you're just trying to stir the shit. Wtf is wrong with you?

I guess I was technically mistaken. It was in the 1st. perception YouTube Video referring to #3 which is basically the same shot as #5 in the 2nd. YouTube Perception Video.

BUT...here it is...it's right after the 7:20 mark.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAKAP8iR3Lw#t=434

PS My earlier post had another glitch. I mistakenly said thickening when Stan had said inside. That was because I tried it with B & a thickening pivot.

Sorry for the mistake.
 
Last edited:
So why did you erase the link to the redhead, sitting backward in the chair?

:confused:
QUOTE=ENGLISH!;5023540]I guess I was technically mistaken. It was in the 1.st perception YouTube Video referring to #3 which is th same shat as #5 in the 2nd. YouTube Video.

BUT...here it is...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAKAP8iR3Lw#t=429
[/QUOTE]

Technical Qlithe. That was for Chicago RJ. I am NOT a Tech Wizard nor am I a Typist.

Why do so many do so much to attack the messenger about matters unrelated to the matters at hand instead of dealing with the 'questions' within the discussion?
 
Last edited:
I guess I was technically mistaken. It was in the 1st. perception YouTube Video referring to #3 which is teh same shot as #5 in the 2nd. YouTube Perception Video.

BUT...here it is...it's right after the 7:20 mark.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAKAP8iR3Lw#t=434

Please somebody...make this guy go away.

He just posts and posts and posts thinking it's going to make him right.

You made your point 50 posts ago. We know your opinion.

It's just very few agree with you.
 
When I blow out my birthday candle tomorrow, I'm gonna wish for English to stop posting in the aiming section. One of these days we'll have a section where CTE users can collaborate instead of always having to fend off that guy.
 
My apologies to those that are upset. That was not my intent.

Stan had said that the solution was A with an inside, yet nob suggested B.

I've shot it with B & both inside & outside pivots & only came close with the outside but it was much closer than I ever came with A & inside.

It was intended as a means of clarification but yes a question as to the objectivity.

No CTEer is going to agree with me but there are many that are not CTEers that do agree regarding the nature of CTE.

I've recently received PMs to that effect.

I should have followed the advice that I gave 8Pack/Anthony...

AND I will try my best to do just that.

Again, Sorry for the interruption.

Please proceed WITHOUT me.
 
Last edited:
My question was an attack?

Sheese.......:p




Technical Qlithe. That was for Chicago RJ. I am NOT a Tech Wizard nor am I a Typist.

Why do so many do so much to attack the messenger about matters unrelated to the matters at hand instead of dealing with the 'questions' within the discussion?[/QUOTE]
 
My apologies to those that are upset. That was not my intent.

Stan had said that the solution was A with an inside, yet nob suggested B.

I've shot it with B & both inside & outside pivots & only came close with the outside but it was much closer than I ever came with A & inside.

It was intended as a means of clarification but yes a question as to the objectivity.

No CTEer is going to agree with me but there are many that are not CTEers that do agree regarding the nature of CTE.

I've recently received PMs to that effect.

I should have followed the advice that I gave 8Pack/Anthony...

AND I will try my best to do just that.

Again, Sorry for the interruption.

Please proceed WITHOUT me.

Then why do you keep posting? I don't think you can find one CTE'er that cares about other people agreeing or disagreeing. Was a special election held and those "other people" elected you to represent them?

You were plainly told by AZ House Pro to leave it alone, yet you continue to defy him. What, are you begging to be banned again? You brought this exact same thing up earlier in this thread or another thread. It was answered then, yet you continue to chew on it. It should be painfully obvious by now the problem isn't with CTE, the problem is with you. Once again, what is wrong with you?
 
Then why do you keep posting? I don't think you can find one CTE'er that cares about other people agreeing or disagreeing. Was a special election held and those "other people" elected you to represent them?

You were plainly told by AZ House Pro to leave it alone, yet you continue to defy him. What, are you begging to be banned again? You brought this exact same thing up earlier in this thread or another thread. It was answered then, yet you continue to chew on it. It should be painfully obvious by now the problem isn't with CTE, the problem is with you. Once again, what is wrong with you?

How can everyone proceed WITHOUT me if you & others keep directing comments in posts TO me?

I intend to 'Move on with 'my' life' & leave CTE to it's fans.

I just thought your suggestion to Anthony deserved some clarification.

However, I do think that if the fans of CTE want & have a sub-forum & threads for which to ONLY sing the accolades of CTE then there should be the same for those that are NOT fans of CTE.

But...that IS for Mike & Jerry to determine.
 
How can everyone proceed WITHOUT me if you & others keep directing comments in posts TO me?

I intend to 'Move on with 'my' life' & leave CTE to it's fans.

I just thought your suggestion to Anthony deserved some clarification.

However, I do think that if the fans of CTE want & have a sub-forum & threads for which to ONLY sing the accolades of CTE then there should be the same for those that are NOT fans of CTE.

But...that IS for Mike & Jerry to determine.

You purposefully posting false information that you been corrected on before offers clarification how? Anthony is an adult, if he needs clarification, he's capable of asking. You clarifying anything about CTE would qualify as the joke of the year.

CTE users have no problem having a meaningful discussion and trying to help people who have a sincere interest. It's blatantly clear to everyone you don't fall into that category and only wish to disrupt and cause problems. Read the responses in this thread, it is clear what purple think of your postings in this forum.
 
You purposefully posting false information that you been corrected on before offers clarification how? Anthony is an adult, if he needs clarification, he's capable of asking. You clarifying anything about CTE would qualify as the joke of the year.

CTE users have no problem having a meaningful discussion and trying to help people who have a sincere interest. It's blatantly clear to everyone you don't fall into that category and only wish to disrupt and cause problems. Read the responses in this thread, it is clear what purple think of your postings in this forum.

Yet another post directed 'at' me that is full of bait.

Sorry, no can do.
 
Yet another post directed 'at' me that is full of bait.

Sorry, no can do.


Rick don't be bothered by their words, you have just as much right to discuss things here as the next guy. Sooner or later someone will come with a better explanation of whats happening and the truth of the matter will surface.

BTW if some of you are by bothered by Ricks posting, just don't read it. ;)
 
,
If you're going to make CTE work, one of the first things you have to do is quit thinking in 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, etc hits.

Try this with those 5 shots. I personally find the B a little easier to hit those shots with than the A or C (depending on which direction you're cutting the ball). Let's say you're going to cut to the left. Line up where you are seeing zero overlap, you're seeing it behind the CB straight into the OB. Now, start edging left until you see a perfect 1/2 ball OVERLAP. This is not a half ball hit at all because you are offset. Instead of looking for points on the two balls, try to see the line you would look down to have the 1/2 ball overlap. This is your perception, that line you're looking down. Now, come into the CB with your cue aligned 1/2 tip to the right of CCB. Fix your bridge, pivot 1/2 tip to CCB, shoot.

With that said, I don't think you'll really appreciate the magic of the perception unless you use CTE, ETA or ETC. Instead of shooting all 5 positions, try one position to the furthest right or furthest left. Cut one right, then cut the next shot cut one left. These are at the two extremes. If you can start to actually see the perception line on both of these shots, you'll be along way down the road to understanding how the perception line changes and it isn't a subconscious adjustment in the least.

What Neil is telling you about alignment is correct. This helps get you to a position where you can best see the actual perception and move into the shot properly with minimal movement. Stan does this so automatically, it is why he is able to move through the process so fast and smoothly.

If you're even 1/2 as good a player as you've presented yourself to be, you should begin to get this with a reasonable amount of effort. If you don't, either you've misrepresented your skill level and/or you're not trying and simply trolling. I tend to believe the latter but I'd like to give you the benefit of the doubt.

I would assume your talking to me?? If so, news flash...I've said in the past I know the pivot system better than most of you and from the looks of things ...all of you.;)..

 
Back
Top