Celtic said:
This is why it always boggles my mind that people say straight pool should be the pro game again to replace 9-ball. The arguement against 9-ball is simply the fact it is too easy now for the top pro's and it almost a flip of a coin who is going to win in a match between 2 top 20. Straight pool is clearly NOT the answer to fix this. The game was normally played as a race to 150 points and it seems there were TONNES of players that could run a 150 and out often and as such the first person who gets the open shot or makes a tough pot is suddenly going to sit their opponent in their seat for the rest of the match.
Disagree, Celtic. There were tons of players that could run a hundred on ordinary equipment, but few could do it on tight equipment under tournament conditions.
Entrie US Opens would occasionally include only two or three centruies.
Nick Varner won the 1981 World 14.1 Championship without a century.
As somebody who attended ninie wqorld championship straight pool events, I can tell you that all 50 ball runs on that tight equipment were understood to be outstanding.
Balls per inning is a strange puppy in straight pool becasue safeties count as zero, but back then only the top three or four would have a BPI > 10. At his best, Sigel managed about 13 for a whole event, and before him, Mosconi had averaged a 15. Most players were in the 4 to 7 range, meaning that typical races to 150 consisted of about 30 innings. Even for the truly elite, games still tended to last an average of about 12 to 15 innings.
The truth is that a race to 150 on tight equipment was really quite a long race, and the cream nearly always rose to the top becase of it.
This thread had focus on what the elite can and could do on ordinary equipment in practice conditions, and not what the elite could do on tight equipment under world championship competition conditions.
Important not to confuse one for the other. There were many that could run 200 in practice that went a pool lifetime without a century in world championship play.
All these points aside, however, I agree that straight IS NOT the game that should decide the world champion. I have always believed that the world championship should be decided by the only game played by almost all recreational players, and that would be eight ball.