Jumping Joe,
I wish you were not so cynical.
There is a lot of idfference between getting $1,000 or getting $4,000.
This is not an exhibition - the players will try hard to win.
That gets them more money, bragging rights, and a future match!
If any of the players do 'chop', they will both be banned from any future events - and please remember that includes CSI events.
If the players think they can 'get away with it' - they should know better. The truth always comes out.
It is just not true what you say: "may I say most of the time the 2 parties will just agree to a 50/50 split".
So how about some encouragement for the concept?
Mark Griffin
Jumping Joe,
Thanks for the nice thoughts.
Chopping ruins pool and the players are going to have to understand that they are the losers.
The pro players in US are starving! If they elect to 'chop' in one of our events, they will probably have to find a new occupation.
They will be banned from TAR events and CSI events.
That covers a lot of ground: US Open One Pocket, US Open 10-Ball, Jay Swanson Memorial, US Bar Table Championships, all BCAPL regional events and banned from amateur league play.
PLUS other future events we are working on.
I hope no one tries . . .
Mark Griffin
You know, in all honesty, it's pretty hard not to be cynical about pool sometimes, given everything that has happened to pool over the years.
I think for some, skepticism has turned into the norm after years and years of the promises, and the subsequent let downs.
Although it's nice to see you guys trying to change things for the better.
Great idea, great format.
But at the same time, with the above statements about punishing "the chop", how exactly can someone be sure what happens?
If there is a chop, how do you prove it? Especially to the point that you are willing to ban them from other events.
If there isn't a chop, what's to stop some jealous players from starting rumors and throwing these two guys under the bus, for a chance at a couple tournaments without them involved? Or just for the heck of it to get their jollies.
You know how pool players are with that type of thing.
It would be nice if there were a high degree of integrity in the game, but at the same time, there really are some treacherous people in this sport.
I like the idea of punishing treacherous pool players. I just don't think it's so straight forward and easy to prove, especially when the instant there are accusations levied against someone, all sorts of character witnesses come out to defend them.
Just some food for thought.
Thanks again for making this match happen.