TAR 30, and the winner is...

[CJ Wiley]

I agree and so do "they"

Glen,
no disrespect but that TAR poll is compromised of APA players rated 6 or less for the most part.

This poll would be alot better to ser with say 50 top players. I guarantee they dont want 4.5" pockets to gamble on.

Im sure they would prefer the TAR table the way it is.

I agree and so do "they". We want ten foot tables with 4.25 pockets.

 

[realkingcobra]

What I disagree with is his origingal inference that a 4.5" diamond plays like a 4" Brunswick. The Brunswick simply rejects the missed shot without the ball entering the pocket at all. The Diamond will funnel in a bad shot and at lower speeds easily take the ball.

You're going to have to show me where I said that chris

 

[realkingcobra]

And hopefully you have already picked out someone besides yourself to do the PR work.

No, actually it's not hard to run a PRO's only tournament system if the money's guaranteed....and NOT owed

 

[realkingcobra]

Glen,
no disrespect but that TAR poll is compromised of APA players rated 6 or less for the most part.

This poll would be alot better to ser with say 50 top players. I guarantee they dont want 4.5" pockets to gamble on.

Im sure they would prefer the TAR table the way it is. It is a wonderful table.

So, what you're saying is the all the top 50 players gamble?...and that's how they make a living?

 

[realkingcobra]

I agree and so do "they". We want ten foot tables with 4.25 pockets.

I don't dissagree with you on this CJ, but what I do dissagree with is having to let anyone that pays an entry fee play against the best this sport has to offer. I feel strongly that the day Tiger Woods starts playing 72 holes with a bunch of no bodies in a tournament, then that's good enough for the Professional sport of pool as well...otherwise there needs to be a skill level test performed before each "Pro's ONLY" event and only the top 64 by skill test be allowed to play...and guaranteed something in pay even if they don't make it past the first round...just because they made the cut to play with the rest of the Pro's in that event.

 

[JumpinJoe]

So, what you're saying is the all the top 50 players gamble?...and that's how they make a living?

No what I'm saying is, they are the only ones playing on that table.
This is about the TAR table. No bangers are playing a match on there on PPV.

 

[Celtic]

I agree and so do "they". We want ten foot tables with 4.25 pockets.

So do I. That is just about perfect.

Set up a pro tour on those CJ, I will pay whatever to watch those on streams.

 

[realkingcobra]

No what I'm saying is, they are the only ones playing on that table.
This is about the TAR table. No bangers are playing a match on there on PPV.

This poll would be alot better to ser with say 50 top players. I guarantee they dont want 4.5" pockets to gamble on.

No, what I just quoted is what you said, and I quote..."to gamble on"

 

[JumpinJoe]

No, what I just quoted is what you said, and I quote..."to gamble on"

whether its gambling, exhibition or whatnot, Yes they are the only ones playing there on PPV.

 

[CreeDo]

no disrespect but that TAR poll is compromised of APA players rated 6 or less for the most part.

This poll would be alot better to ser with say 50 top players. I guarantee they dont want 4.5" pockets to gamble on.

What's the conversion rate between APA5 dollars and top-50 player dollars?
I assume the APA5 dollars won't buy nearly as much at the grocery store.