Two things:
1) In the decades-old co-opted use of the word "liberal", doesn't it imply fighting for the rights of the weak and the disadvantaged (in a somewhat negative way)? If so, the "liberal" viewpoint on the use of jumpsticks should ABSOLUTELY be the opposite of what Jude is suggesting. The use of jumpsticks is a great equalizer, allowing players of much weaker abilities to get out of safeties. As a general rule, given two equally-intelligent people, I would expect the more "liberal" one to fight for the right to use it.
Steve, you're right about the way the word "liberal" has been used, and it's one of those words with many different meanings to different people. Suffice it to say that, in this instance, I used the word to indicate not what the word means but how people who are "liberal" act when confronted with a specific situation. In such situations, "liberals" can be the most domineering, dismissive people on the planet. Another thing I've noticed over time is that "liberals" tend to favor the idea that the end justifies the means, so in this case, the end would be what Jude wants: to have rules that favor his winning, and not his opponent. So whatever the means, whether appealing to a sense of the way pool used to be, or getting the organizers of a tournament, or league, or organization, to outlaw their use, would be good. (Never mind that jump cues have become a part of the game, to some extent, in recent years.) I realize Jude didn't actually say all that, but that's what I took from his comments.
2) You are 100% correct when you say "To people not from New York, many New Yorkers are brash. Can't say as I agree with that, but many people hold that view." A good friend and great player just came back from a months-long vacation walking the mountains and plains in western europe. He said he got in one major argument the whole time, with a lady from California.
As soon as they met and she found out she was from NY, she was egging him on with all kinds of bullshit. He tried to remain polite, but she kept needling him. Not playfully, just annoyingly. It got to a point that he couldn't take it anymore, ended up cursing at her, and of course she replied with, "Oh, just like a New Yorker." People are funny, aren't they?
You bet they are!
I often think about how right after 9/11, I heard people being interviewed in middle America about seeing NYers lined up immediately after the attacks to give blood and to volunteer. And the overwhelming sentiment from these people was, "wow, I didn't expect people in NEW YORK CITY to do that." It was actually touching to hear, because maybe, at the very least in those dark, dark days, it had helped to shape NY's image a bit differently across the world.
But I'm sure that stuff has long been forgotten.
The people from the beautiful City of New York who came out and performed the great, heroic deeds after 9/11 are a never ending source of inspiration to me, and I'm sure, millions of others, both in the U.S. and around the world. They are some of the best that New York has to offer; my hat's off to them. Would that all our compatriots were so generous and courageous.
Anyway, I'm rambling.
- Steve