***The Next Edition of the 14.1 Live Player Review***Jerry Tarantola vs. Mike Sigel**

oldzilla

oldzilla

Accu-Stats Messenger
Silver Member
***The Next Edition of the 14.1 Live Player Review***Jerry Tarantola vs. Mike Sigel** - Today, 02:38 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This coming Monday Night 9/27/10
8:00PM EDT

Live and FREE from the Simonis Arena at Breaker Billiards in Clifton, NJ

The Next Edition of the 14.1 Live Player Review
125 Point Straight Pool Match

This week featuring: NYC Grind's Jerry Tarantola vs. Mike "Captain Hook" Sigel.

Geoff Conway will be in the booth with Megan Smith interviewing both players in the Player Review format after each player's inning is complete.

Debbie Smith will be on hand as the guest referee.

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/accu-stats-on-location
 
When Pat mentioned it last night I had a feeling it might be Sigel.

That's what I'm talking about. 14.1 baby!
 
Looks like a trend is forming, think we started something good here !


I still want my rematch !

-Steve
 
I always enjoy watching Mike Sigel play. He does look like he's hittin 'em pretty good these days.
 
PoolBum said:
I always enjoy watching Mike Sigel play. He does look like he's hittin 'em pretty good these days.
Click to expand...

Agree. I really like Pat's new format. I think this would be a good niche for Accu-Stats. I'd love to see Pat vs Mike ---- that would be sweet. As fast as they play it should be for 200 or even 250 instead of 125 though. Just sayin'

Great job Accu-Stats -- loved it.
 
Absolutely love how Mike comes into the booth after each rack to discuss how it went. Awesome stuff, thanks!!
 
stevekur1 said:
Looks like a trend is forming, think we started something good here !


I still want my rematch !

-Steve
Click to expand...

When I saw this format with you an Pat I immediately thought "This format is excellent for Accu-Stats, AZers, ustream viewers, 14.1, and pool streaming in general." The opponent in the booth concept is great -- lots can be passed and learned! Whomever came up with this idea is to be highly commended IMHO. The viewing numbers attest to this!

Time may be an issue that Pat & company are dealing with so they could combine the game show idea from time-to-time. For example, rather then the normal break, Pat vs "whomever" could start with the same "ball-in-hand break out shot set up" for each rack, try to make "all" the balls (rather then leave a break out shot), and given a certain number of racks apiece. A missed ball means the end of that rack. After a designated certain number of matches have been played, those with the highest points vs Pat (say a dozen or so peeps) can go off against each other! This of course would be in addition to regular matches (challenges or exhibitions) such as those between you and Pat and Mike vs Jerry.

I wrote this kind of quickly and hope it makes sense. 14.1 needs more coverage and who better then Pat could do that!!!

Pat spelled backwards is "Tap" -- how appropriate!

Am I way off here --- what do others think about this idea?

(Pat: Give SK a rematch ;))
 
Last edited:
cmbwsu said:
When I saw this format with you an Pat I immediately thought "This format is excellent for Accu-Stats, AZers, ustream viewers, 14.1, and pool streaming in general." The opponent in the booth concept is great -- lots can be passed and learned! Whomever came up with this idea is to be highly commended IMHO. The viewing numbers attest this!

Time may be an issue that Pat & company are dealing with so they could combine the game show idea from time-to-time. For example, rather then the normal break, Pat vs "whomever" could start with the same "ball-in-hand break out shot set up" for each rack, try to make "all" the balls (rather then leave a break out shot), and given a certain number of racks apiece. A missed ball means the end of that rack. After a designated certain number of matches have been played, those with the highest points vs Pat (say a dozen or so peeps) can go off against each other! This of course would be in addition to regular matches (challenges or exhibitions) such as those between you and Pat and Mike vs Jerry.

I wrote this kind of quickly and hope it makes sense. 14.1 needs more coverage and who better then Pat could do that!!!

Pat spelled backwards is "Tap" -- how appropriate!

Am I way off here --- what do others think about this idea?

(Pat: Give SK a rematch ;))
Click to expand...

hmmmm very interesting indeed !
 
cmbwsu said:
For example, rather then the normal break, Pat vs "whomever" could start with the same "ball-in-hand break out shot set up" for each rack, try to make "all" the balls (rather then leave a break out shot), and given a certain number of racks apiece. A missed ball means the end of that rack. After a designated certain number of matches have been played, those with the highest points vs Pat (say a dozen or so peeps) can go off against each other! This of course would be in addition to regular matches (challenges or exhibitions) such as those between you and Pat and Mike vs Jerry.

I wrote this kind of quickly and hope it makes sense. 14.1 needs more coverage and who better then Pat could do that!!!

Pat spelled backwards is "Tap" -- how appropriate!

Am I way off here --- what do others think about this idea?

(Pat: Give SK a rematch ;))
Click to expand...

this would preety much be done the same way we did it at Valley Forge, and the way that Jewitt runs his event at DCC.

And Yeah i want a rematch.....LOL :grin:

Steve
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top