sjm said:
That Blackjack is a classy guy is no secret in these parts.
Ok I am sure I will get bashed for this. even though its NOT intended to be negative in any way.....and YES I agree that BlackJack is a VERY classy guy and one of the best written word instructors in the business...(have not had the opportunity to learn in person from him, but I have read pretty much all of his lessons on line)
I would like to play Devil's Advocate for a second.
Tanner although I am sure is very motivated and since he is still the innocent kid has that "lovable" quality, and obviously has a bright future in this sport, may NOT be the right choice for the simple reason that he has MANY years in front of him.
As evident from recent tragic news of the loss of OHB....there are some deserving qualified posters on this board that I am sure would love to (even if not play) attend the US Open. and have never had the opporunity. (Not that OHB never had the opportunity, but there are players that are near his caliber on this board that did not choose pool as a money making business as OHB did)
Please don't get me wrong. I am all for the "future" of pool, but from what I read of Tanners background, he will have many "opportunities" in the near future.
I am not saying don't vote for him, all I am really trying to say is don't vote for "the lovable kid"
My personal vote would be for someone like CptnJR.
Even though I don't always agree with his posts, he has a dedication to this board, and is not afraid to contribute ideas and concepts. (even if they are wrong

....JK )
He is the perfect example of someone who has not chosen pool as a "career" but has shown a dedication to being a "student" of the game.
That is the type of person I would like see get the "opportunity" (that may otherwise not get)
JMO