I disagree with this statement Joey. Just because gets more for there cue doesnt mean that they have more knowledge and or better execution. Just means they expect more the there work than the other guy. And just because someone doesnt command as much for there cue than the other guy doesnt mean there not as good or doesnt strive to improve. I think we all are always trying new things to improve our cues. I dont think anyone here is whinning about the other guys price. Just stating our own opinions. At least I am. I also dont believe that anyone is better than the next person. And therefor I will never bow to anyone. And I know that is not necessarily what you mean. But I wouldnt never bow to another cue maker no matter how big or what ever they are. There no better than me or you.Unfortunately, you're assuming wrong here imo.
The guy who can commands more, has a little more knowledge and better execution imo.
The guy who does not command as much as the other guy, should find out why he doesn't and strive to be better ( if he's not happy with his price ).
Not whine about the other guy getting more for "the same" as he perceives.
Guess what, they're not the same.
If prestige was the differential, bow to the other guy who has more prestige.
If you have a cue you have say 200.00 into, not counting your time. And you sell this cue for 1,000, thats a 800.00 profit on such cue. Which is a great margin no matter what retail business you are in. And if you double your cost by including your time, it is still 600.00 profit. Still better than any retail business I know of. The ones that cane pull 4,000 plus for this same cost cue, good for them for the tactics and sales tricks they used to acquire such ridiculous profits. My original question, is how and why is this cue worth any more than cue a if both men are knowledged in building?
However, if your question is based on the numbers given in your hypothetical example,
I can understand your confusion. They are nowhere near realistic.
4 hrs to build a cue??? Surely you jest. $800 profit minus my time?? Please.
My shop rate is $50/hr. It can take yrs. to build a cue properly.
---> I agree, your shop rate may be 50 hours to do repairs, not to build.
Where did you get the notion that there is money to be made in building cues?
---> Because there is if done correctly with the right balances in place.
There isn't, not to any appreciable degree anyway. It's a labor of love, nothing more.
---> Starts out that way, then it turns into a business. So much more.
Big name companies build cues with the bottom-line as their goal. That's WHY they exist.
An indy cue-maker's bottom-line is: 'I hope I can at least break even on this one'.
---> I agree with this for the most part. But these big name companies have there technics down, the right and best equipment, buy the best premium woods, and know their stuff. While some that call themselves a cue company do not.
Back to your original question of 'what separates one CM's work from another'.
That's easy. At what point do you say: That's good enough. Therein lies the difference.
--->I agree, not all so called lower level cue maker's fall into what I am talking about. Their standards, technics, and talent is not up to par, while others are. But in return I have seen so called top tere maker's lose site of quality due to thinking well I am such and such, or also have not reached their potential in quality and talent. They just think they have.
KJ
PS - You might want to try using the 'quote' feature at the bottom of every post.
Without using it, one would think that everything you're quoting is your statement.
This makes your posts very confusing to read.
At this point in time, I would say market hype.danieldakota53 said:what makes some cues draw thousands, and others do not.
Perhaps you are over-valuing your "talents".qbilder said:First of all, every cue maker who has invested time & money into machinery and a learning curve, is not getting paid anywhere near what his talents are worth.
Knowing how to play pool is no longer a requirement to be a cue maker.qbilder said:Could it possibly be that Danny is a better cue maker because he's a better player?
Forget about cue makers... Do you really believe that the majority of cue buyers "understand the subtleties" of how a cue should play or feel?qbilder said:It's pointless if he doesn't understand what that cue is supposed to do or how it should feel.
---> And I do use the quote feature and have many times in this thread if you read back through. I really do not think I am being confusing at all. But would still like answers. Thank you for your input KJ, like to see more from other makers. Please participate and add to our discussion.
We should hype this thread so it becomes more valuable.
the person making the purchase.
stop and think about it, who is the one saying which cue is better, who is qualified to say which cue is better ?????
a cue is only worth what someone is willing to pay.
You have my input and this will be my last.
My reluctance to enter this thread was based on my perception that it is a thinly veiled
'discussion' for the purpose of bashing cue-makers for the money they charge.
That perception hasn't changed. Walk the walk and you won't need to talk.
--->Sorry KJ, you are very wrong in your perceptions. As I have already stated this was not the intent,and even asked for names, I would not comply with that request due to its not towards any ONE builder.
Your understanding of why some cue-makers charge more than others won't likely be found in a discussion.
I think you may be correct on this statement, as they do not seem to want to answer.
There is no simple answer though I did give you the condensed version.
Each builder is different. Even if their cues resemble another builder's, they're not the same.
You suggested earlier that once a CM reaches a certain level, that those at that level all possess the same knowledge.
Maybe they do and maybe they don't. The difference is in how that knowledge is applied.
Just like your decision to 'quote' sometimes and sometimes not.
Guess which one moves the ball easier.
---> Guess which one, both! If both cues are made well, it falls into the owners hands to make it perform.
KJ
I have tried to keep the thread on topic. It is others off on tangents that are taking it that way. As I have reminded several times, if 2 cue makers are equal in talent and skill, what makes one demand more money than the other. Very simple question I thought.
I have tried to keep the thread on topic. It is others off on tangents that are taking it that way. As I have reminded several times, if 2 cue makers are equal in talent and skill, what makes one demand more money than the other. Very simple question I thought.
How do you know they have equal talent and skill?