ChicagoPete
Registered
I was wondering if more tree rings makes for a better shaft? I'm not sure if there's a better way to explain my question but I think you guys will understand what I'm asking. Thank you.
I was wondering if more tree rings makes for a better shaft? I'm not sure if there's a better way to explain my question but I think you guys will understand what I'm asking. Thank you.
Are there any visual markers that would indicate that a shaft might play well?
Some people say yes and some people say no...................
Kim
Are there any visual markers that would indicate that a shaft might play well?
Thanks a lot guys for the info. The reason I asked is I bought a 1991 handmade cue with a hand cut g10 pin (on the shaft the butt is the female end) a few years back that I really like and use. It has a ton of rings, I was told from the owner not the cue maker "The shaft is from the 1930s look at all the rings!" I ended up getting another shaft for it from a friend of mine that was made by the same cue maker (who is retired) that has barely any rings on it but has the same style g10 pin. I haven't been able to see how the hit is because the g10 pin is a millimeter to long and I need to have in brought down so it will fit my cue. I wanted to find out the info you guys shared with me before I actually brought it down. Thanks again for your help. Ill let you know how it works out.
Most makers prefer 10-15 rings per inch.
8 would be pushing it b/c they don't look so good.
You can still get good playing shafts with 8 rings per inch of course.
Anything less than 8 RPI, shouldn't be on custom cues imo.
They belong to break cues and production cues imo.
Flex that new shaft between your two hands and get a feel how stiff it is compared to your old one. It might tell you right there if it's good.
Some woods are just way too soft to get a decent playability from them imo.