I see some posts referring to "ethical reasons" and "principles" for not wanting cues that contain ivory. I respect your positions and fully support your freedom of choice. The issue here however is that very thing. Ones choices and freedoms are being taken away. Also many will suffer monetary losses and this has nothing to do with protecting the majestic pachyderm. It is all political posturing to pander to a particular political base.
I think the cuemakers, collectors, and players who want ivory, that is preban and documented, should have that option and I see nothing unprincipled or unethical about that.
Claud,
Please don't cloud the issue with facts such as this. Old fashioned ideas such as freedom, private property, the meaning of the Commerce Clause, have no place in a discussion of ethics. Your post infers that some may be hypocrites and that is totally unacceptable. Where would be we without do-gooders? Besides, why should we limit the power of the Dictator in pandering? This country was built on pandering.
Last edited: