USBTC Professional or not?

Try to look at it this way. If the players are treated differently, like Stevie not having to pay to play while others do, then the lesser players might not play. If the lesser players don't play, Stevie makes no money.

those lesser players come to play pros and are happy making the minimum if that, they get experience they can take back to there local rooms and tourneys and bragging to there buddies. Its always been like that and i do see what you are saying also but someone has to show Stevies side of this.
 
those lesser players come to play pros and are happy making the minimum if that, they get experience they can take back to there local rooms and tourneys and bragging to there buddies. Its always been like that and i do see what you are saying also but someone has to show Stevies side of this.

I am one of those lesser players, but I don't go there to play the pros. I am at that tournament every chance I get. I can only speak for myself, but if certain players get to play without paying, I will no longer attend that tournament. However, if the tournament promoter said that the semi's and the finals will be free play for the players, I would accept that. Until that day comes, every player at that tournament should play by the same rules, and be happy doing it.
 
and if your prize money is increased because of a pros presents on a ppv table you would also gladly take that too, right? so its a win win situation for you and the lesser players?
 
and if your prize money is increased because of a pros presents on a ppv table you would also gladly take that too, right? so its a win win situation for you and the lesser players?

If Stevie was a big enough draw to increase my prize money simply because of his presence on the PPV table, I'd be happy. Unfortunately, that is not the case.
 
did you get the ppv hoping to watch the big name pro's play or did you get it to watch some guys you never herd of? lets say his presents at the tourney helped make 5 players an extra $20 bucks each...how cool is that...think about this.

earl! i watch a steve miserk tourney from the 80's the other day and the commentators were talking how earl snapped a cue on purpose out of frustration early on in the tourney,. so earl has acted like an ass for 30 years , thats why he gets it from people!

im also not trying to make this personal with you guys either, but just giving my opinion.

It's cool. I enjoy a discussion with no name calling. I appreciate that champ:) I will fully admit that dropping quarters on the stream table is just tacky. Even Justin said as much but I also believe that if you were to do that there would be an outcry from the dead money that they weren't getting the same treatment. Whatchya gonna do?

Regardless of how it's handled it's gotta be a real chore to try and keep everyone happy AND try and make this profitable
 
You should not be putting coins in the "T.V." table. It is a bit insulting. Not a huge deal, But I agree.

It would seem to me this would be on the level of charging Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson green fees. if Buste and SVB didn't pay tokens earier, why shoulc they be required on the Stevie Moore match ?
 
If Stevie was a big enough draw to increase my prize money simply because of his presence on the PPV table, I'd be happy. Unfortunately, that is not the case.

we be on common ground now and your seeing my point now and the point Stevie made in trying to get Shane to stand beside him. I think stevie was not just talking about himself in that dispute but all pro's in general
 
By your way of thinking all American Idol guests should be paid because theyre making a profit off of the contestants. Or perhaps people such as Kelly Clarkson were happy just to have a televised event to showcase their talent in hopes of sponsors/ record deal?

In response to your local tournament that has a sliding green fee: you know what's alot easier than assigning handicaps to hundreds of people in an open national tournament?? Dropping quarters! You go deep.. You pay more. You go 2 and out... You pay less. Crazy huh??

In case you didn't notice - Justin agreed that he doesn't like the appearance of guys having to plug coins into the streaming table (paraphrase).

If you really want to compare the USBTC to American Idol, you would have to have the singers on A.I. drop coins into a Karoake machine before they could sing. I bet that wouldn't go over too well. Not too mention, I'm fairly certain they are shown some small level of appreciation for being on the show. ;)

There's obviously two different conversations going on here. The first one is about the way Stevie handled himself. Nobody can defend his actions. Hopefully, he gets a little grief over this and changes his tune next time.

The 2nd conversation is about putting coins into a steaming table. There have been a lot of good ideas already presented on how to avoid this in the future. I'm hoping they can figure out a way to implement one of these ideas and this whole situaiton will be avoided. Unfortunately, a different player, at a different venue, at a different time, will find something different to complain about. Oh well.
 
It would seem to me this would be on the level of charging Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson green fees. if Buste and SVB didn't pay tokens earier, why shoulc they be required on the Stevie Moore match ?

They did. Everyone had to pay. The only people that didn't pay were Stevie and (I think) Ernesto in the early round of the 10 ball tourney. That was before the decision was made that all players will pay.

Where did you get the idea that Shane and Bustamante didn't pay tokens?
 
It would seem to me this would be on the level of charging Tiger Woods and Phil Mickelson green fees. if Buste and SVB didn't pay tokens earier, why shoulc they be required on the Stevie Moore match ?


I believe Tiger and Phil are charged the same fee's as other entrants. That being said you are comparing tournaments that generate 10's of millions in revenue. And a sport that is generating revenue in the billions. If pool was remotely close to generating revenue like this then yes Stevie or any pro would have a legitimate bi*ch.

I still don't understand how it is insulting to pay for the games. To pay $12 for a guaranteed $2300 and a chance at $4300. Just because it was the finals and on a stream. Really?
 
I think it is perfectly fair. Every event you go to they take out "green fees". In those events, every player pays the same amount. In this specific event, the more you pay, the more you are making. The lesser players lose earlier, so they pay less in "green fees".

I think putting the coins in the table really adds a fun element to the tournament, and makes it feel more like playing in a bar table event. As far as Stevie's actions (which I watched in amazement on PPV), he should have handled it with more tact. Weather he was right or wrong could/will be debated all night long, but he lost the respect of a few people with his actions. In the long run, that might cost him far more than the $5 in coins that he was fighting over.

EXACTLY. This is a glaring example of "penny-wise, dollar-foolish." This can't be argued -- Stevie's cries of "Attica! Attica!" (as Justin so pointedly put it) over saving, what, $5, really put him in a bad light. This is going to hurt Stevie for a long time to come. I know every time I see Stevie, I'm going to be thinking of this event -- and not endearingly, either.

There's a small counterpoint to this, and that's the notion of green fees -- whether they should be bundled-in with the tourney entry fee, and just open-up all the tables. Most of the bar table tourneys that I've ever entered (including some notable ones in Colorado) open the tables up. It actually helps the tourney proceed along smoothly, without the hassles of table coin-box malfunctions (e.g. the person slams the coins home, but balls hang up in the collection compartment, and the table has to then be opened-up anyway to retrieve those captive balls). I've seen and played in barbox tourneys where this problem *alone* caused a lot of delays. Can you imagine if this happened continually on the streaming table? (Sure, some people may argue "but then the producers should switch to another [working] table to stream" -- having to now dismount and relocate all their video equipment in the middle of "show time." Or some may argue, "well stop using those %$#@! Valley barboxes and switch to Diamond SmartTables, you numbskulls!" Yeah right. Tell an establishment, at the time of the tourney, that they need to forklift upgrade all of their equipment to Diamond. S-u-r-e!!)

Stevie's actions were deplorable, for sure. But at the same time, in a small, sick, and poorly executed sort of way, he has a point -- the tables should be opened up. Not so much for his silly elitist "but I'm Stevie Moore, I'm a professional, and I'm being displayed to the world on a streaming table" notion, but rather for the fact that it keeps the tourney running smoothly -- no snags with inoperative coin boxes, hung/captive balls in the collection bin, cue balls that don't return properly (e.g. mistakenly go to the object ball collection bin), or anything like that. This is especially true on the streaming table -- snafus like these, on a live stream, would look pretty p*ss-poor -- definitely flying in the face of using the word "professional" to describe this championship tourney.

Just IMHO,
-Sean
 
I think this could have been handled better by all involved. If Stevie had a problem, it should have been taken up with tournament direction after the match and not in view of any spectators.

But this public "outing" of his behavior is unprofessional as well. Your post lacks diplomacy in any form...and it also lacks any respect for Stevie as a professional...or a human being for that matter. Gentlemen works business matters out privately. And if you say that it was him who wasn't being a gentleman so why should you?....then I say lead by example instead of treating someone poorly simply because they did it first.

This isn't a playground. And bullying isn't nice.

Melissa

There are so many good replies in this thread I can't quote them all but I'll choose a few of the best, then add my 2 cents.
 
EXACTLY. This is a glaring example of "penny-wise, dollar-foolish." This can't be argued -- Stevie's cries of "Attica! Attica!" (as Justin so pointedly put it) over saving, what, $5, really put him in a bad light. This is going to hurt Stevie for a long time to come. I know every time I see Stevie, I'm going to be thinking of this event -- and not endearingly, either.

There's a small counterpoint to this, and that's the notion of green fees -- whether they should be bundled-in with the tourney entry fee, and just open-up all the tables. Most of the bar table tourneys that I've ever entered (including some notable ones in Colorado) open the tables up. It actually helps the tourney proceed along smoothly, without the hassles of table coin-box malfunctions (e.g. the person slams the coins home, but balls hang up in the collection compartment, and the table has to then be opened-up anyway to retrieve those captive balls). I've seen and played in barbox tourneys where this problem *alone* caused a lot of delays. Can you imagine if this happened continually on the streaming table? (Sure, some people may argue "but then the producers should switch to another [working] table to stream" -- having to now dismount and relocate all their video equipment in the middle of "show time." Or some may argue, "well stop using those %$#@! Valley barboxes and switch to Diamond SmartTables, you numbskulls!" Yeah right. Tell an establishment, at the time of the tourney, that they need to forklift upgrade all of their equipment to Diamond. S-u-r-e!!)

Stevie's actions were deplorable, for sure. But at the same time, in a small, sick, and poorly executed sort of way, he has a point -- the tables should be opened up. Not so much for his silly elitist "but I'm Stevie Moore, I'm a professional, and I'm being displayed to the world on a streaming table" notion, but rather for the fact that it keeps the tourney running smoothly -- no snags with inoperative coin boxes, hung/captive balls in the collection bin, cue balls that don't return properly (e.g. mistakenly go to the object ball collection bin), or anything like that. This is especially true on the streaming table -- snafus like these, on a live stream, would look pretty p*ss-poor -- definitely flying in the face of using the word "professional" to describe this championship tourney.

Just IMHO,
-Sean

seriously? This is basically stevies job and he thinks he was wronged. Now when i think im getting stiffed at work when it comes to money, i pipe up and say something and the amount has nothing to do with it. This is all he did but i guess his timing was bad! loosen up and stevie will come out of this fine, if not better for speaking up :)
 
Ok what about all the other people at the event that were pissed about having to pay that didn't explode on the people putting the event on (and money in) or their fellow competitors? I can't stand how people are willing to give some the benefit of the doubt over others just because of their pristine view of them that can never seem to be tarnished. I know for a fact that if earl strickland was pulling this same crap he would be getting way more crap over it on the forums than stevie is.

Yes you can all deflect the problem and start talking about plugging quarters vs. green fees but that's neither here nor there. The real problem is a so called professional throwing a tantrum and threatening to hold his breath over an insignificant situation, and then being defended for doing so!

Good post!

Everyone is assuming the other players in the event were upset to pay per game via coins. I was at the event. I played in all three ladies events. I played side by side pros and non pros, females and males. I never heard one person complain about having to put coins in per game.

It's the U.S. Bar Table Championships for goodness sake.
 
I am certainly not going to say Stevie was in the right if things went off as you said they did. He is clearly in the wrong.

But.

Tournaments like the USBTC should go to a green fee and open the tables. The events in Vegas have moved towards doing that and it is better. Instead of charging $1 a game charge a $25 green fee and open the tables. There are many reasons this is better, not the least of which when pool gets TV exposure as the USBTC did it does not look like a cheap nickle and dime sport where professional players are plugging the tables like the regular Joes at the pub. Putting that type of image out there and into the public eye makes this sport look cheap, it hurts it's image and the image of a "professional" pool player, and that hurts the growth of this sport. It simply looks terrible for this sport when Shane Van Boeing is kneeling down in between games to plug a token into a table to get the balls out, it looks cheap and tacky and that is the last thing pool needs to put out there as its image.

Given the way the tournament was set up though Stevie had no cause to suddenly make it an issue on the TV table, nothing need change at that instant and Stevie SHOULD look out for the fact that his sponsers WOULD benefit from the stream exposure if he carried himself as a true professional. His arguement should not have been about "I am Stevie Moore, you guys are making money streaming this and I should not have to pay", it should have been "are you serious, you are going to make me and SVB plug the table in a streamed semi final? That looks tacky, here is $20 cash, now do this sport a favor and open up the table so you don't make the pros in this sport look like chumps."

I also agree with this 100% and everyone else who said in one way or another it would be better to raise the entry fee, lower the money added, or do whatever else you have to do to avoid having the players feed the tables for each game.
 
ok what about all the other people at the event that were pissed about having to pay that didn't explode on the people putting the event on (and money in) or their fellow competitors? I can't stand how people are willing to give some the benefit of the doubt over others just because of their pristine view of them that can never seem to be tarnished. I know for a fact that if earl strickland was pulling this same crap he would be getting way more crap over it on the forums than stevie is.

Yes you can all deflect the problem and start talking about plugging quarters vs. Green fees but that's neither here nor there. The real problem is a so called professional throwing a tantrum and threatening to hold his breath over an insignificant situation, and then being defended for doing so!

ding, ding, ding, ding, ding, we have a winner folks
 
those lesser players come to play pros and are happy making the minimum if that, they get experience they can take back to there local rooms and tourneys and bragging to there buddies. Its always been like that and i do see what you are saying also but someone has to show Stevies side of this.

There are plenty of others who feel just because a guy make more balls in a row then he doesn't that he deserves to be treated different.

All Stevie has to do is man up and apologize for his childish behavior and put this behind him. Will this change how people look at him , with some yes , with some no. Is it the adult thing to do, of course it is.
 
Back
Top