Very absorbing, even suspenseful, obstacle-filled 100-ball run by Mike Sigel @ age 58

arnaldo

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
When you watch it, be sure to set this formerly live-streamed video to the maximum 720p quality and you’ll find it’s plenty crisp and clear enough to easily read even the numbers on the balls (in the full-screen mode). The great video quality makes studying Sigel’s stroking and positional nuances (and the results of his minor but frequent miscalculations) much more effortless and thereby more entertaining, or at least quite involving.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSlaY9nMzGI

In spite of the advance notice in the title of this thread, for us Sigel fans the suspense never lets up as to how, when, and if any of the speed and angle miscalculations will soon end Mike’s run. Mike was never one to be shy about letting spectators know that some perceived minor or major problem or result is severely frustrating him. And then he overcomes it like a champion, until the next one presents itself just few minutes later.

This video amply shows that you can’t get into the smooth rhythm 14.1 demands with so many breaks in concentration occurring, so it’s quite amazing that Sigel manages to cobble together enough moments of sustained excellence alternating with pressure-related miscalculations to produce this run at his age.

It’s from the 2011 World 14.1 Championship. Blessed at least with the absence of a shot clock, Mike is ultra-fidgety, even nervous and head-shakingly indecisive throughout the first rack (also with a lot of vigorous and livid cue bumper carpet slamming) and you’d bet against anything but a short run.

But, via pure talent and the adrenaline of plenty of frustration-induced and even angry temperament, Mike fights his way through virtually all seven-plus racks in just about 60 minutes. His opponent, Oliver Ortmann is pinned to his chair, relegated to racking duties and simply watching/forebearing Mike’s continual struggle with the new and apparently overly fast (for Sigel) cloth.

Watching the video today, and silently rooting for the run to continue at every stumbling point, I couldn’t help occasionally thinking about CJ’s thought provoking observations regarding pro players’ shaft elevations, wrist engagements and apparent diverse gripping techniques . . .

. . . When he’s not shooting with an open bridge or shooting off a rail, most longtime Sigel fans are familiar with the unusual closed bridge he employs, with his palm typically *not* touching the cloth, his hand elevated onto three fingertips. I guess for him, it gives a special sensitivity to the variety of shaft elevations he employs as he’s precisely blending intended englishes. For us mere mortals, that bridge does feel mighty wobbly without a conventional palm contact.

Arnaldo
 
it will be a very long time before Mike cant run 100, i aint worried about him. He is one of the best all around players in history.
 
Ah, Christmas is just around the corner. "A Christmas Story" is one of my favorite movies...


When you watch it, be sure to set this formerly live-streamed video to the maximum 720p quality and you’ll find it’s plenty crisp and clear enough to easily read even the numbers on the balls (in the full-screen mode). The great video quality makes studying Sigel’s stroking and positional nuances (and the results of his minor but frequent miscalculations) much more effortless and thereby more entertaining, or at least quite involving.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSlaY9nMzGI

In spite of the advance notice in the title of this thread, for us Sigel fans the suspense never lets up as to how, when, and if any of the speed and angle miscalculations will soon end Mike’s run. Mike was never one to be shy about letting spectators know that some perceived minor or major problem or result is severely frustrating him. And then he overcomes it like a champion, until the next one presents itself just few minutes later.

This video amply shows that you can’t get into the smooth rhythm 14.1 demands with so many breaks in concentration occurring, so it’s quite amazing that Sigel manages to cobble together enough moments of sustained excellence alternating with pressure-related miscalculations to produce this run at his age.

It’s from the 2011 World 14.1 Championship. Blessed at least with the absence of a shot clock, Mike is ultra-fidgety, even nervous and head-shakingly indecisive throughout the first rack (also with a lot of vigorous and livid cue bumper carpet slamming) and you’d bet against anything but a short run.

But, via pure talent and the adrenaline of plenty of frustration-induced and even angry temperament, Mike fights his way through virtually all seven-plus racks in just about 60 minutes. His opponent, Oliver Ortmann is pinned to his chair, relegated to racking duties and simply watching/forebearing Mike’s continual struggle with the new and apparently overly fast (for Sigel) cloth.

Watching the video today, and silently rooting for the run to continue at every stumbling point, I couldn’t help occasionally thinking about CJ’s thought provoking observations regarding pro players’ shaft elevations, wrist engagements and apparent diverse gripping techniques . . .

. . . When he’s not shooting with an open bridge or shooting off a rail, most longtime Sigel fans are familiar with the unusual closed bridge he employs, with his palm typically *not* touching the cloth, his hand elevated onto three fingertips. I guess for him, it gives a special sensitivity to the variety of shaft elevations he employs as he’s precisely blending intended englishes. For us mere mortals, that bridge does feel mighty wobbly without a conventional palm contact.

Arnaldo
 
And one of the most arrogant players I've ever seen. More so than Strickland!

Here's my take on it...

They say Sigel is a genuinely nice guy to talk to. I don't watch him and think he is arrogant so much as he is just a little self-centered. He may need to be reminded from time to time that it's not all about him, and he makes an adjustment.

Tell Strickland that he is not the center of the universe and he will look at you in confusion.

I've never met either man. That's just my take on it.
 
His 150-and-out against Zuglan was certainly a much purer run. In this run against Ortman he seems to have made a ton of bad decisions but survived all of them. What bothers me is when he agonizes for minutes over a shot that has only one or two ways to be shot. Pumping up the drama? Irritating Ortman? Or maybe he's getting the yips.
 
What bothers me is when he agonizes for minutes over a shot that has only one or two ways to be shot. Pumping up the drama? Irritating Ortman? Or maybe he's getting the yips.

My take on it is that he's a perfectionist, and when he screws up, he has to agonize over it for a minute just to get that out of his system and clear his mind. He then starts to formulate a new plan and approach the shot. I could be wrong, that's just my take on it.

Fatz
 
He certainly is one of the handflippiest guys in pool. He has absolutely mastered the martyr's hand flip. I use it myself on occasion. It's such a simple, elegant gesture. It says

"WTF is this shit?"
"FFS, why do I get bad rolls like this?"
"Uh, wow, what exactly is a player supposed to do here?"
"Can you believe the rolls this guy is getting?"
"Wow, nice equipment, I love these dead rails."
"This game is so unbelievably stupid."
"Every choice here is wrong, I might as well concede."
"I guess the pool gods are just against me today."
 
I played Mike 2 years ago and he ran 180 and missed because of a skid.

Contrary to what many on here think/believe, nobody on planet earth has to beat him in 14.1 on any given day. In fact, I'd go out on a limb and say if he's playing and feeling good about his stroke, I wouldn't call him an underdog to anyone on planet earth in 14.1. Not saying he's a favorite over anyone, just saying he's even money against anyone.

What he might lack as far as "giving a crap" anymore, he makes up for in ego and intelligence. The man is TRIPLE-SMART in 14.1. In a safety battle, I like him over almost anyone in earth at 14.1.

When he's over the ball mid-run, it really appears as though he'll never miss.
 
. . . In a safety battle, I like him over almost anyone in earth at 14.1.
----------------------------------------------------------
This is effectively a nice tribute to Mike's Rochester NY hometown 14.1 mentor, Irving Crane, of whom exactly the same thing was regularly said during Irv's career.

During rare stints commentating 14.1 matches, Mike has noted several times that during pre-tournament solo practice sessions, Crane -- to Mike's amazement -- would play long safety battles against himself (Crane vs Crane) if during a run he was faced with a very low-percentage shot due to his own positional error or a bad roll.

Mike says he initially asked Crane "Why not just move the cue ball a little, Irv, and keep on running -- it's only practice play." Crane replied, "Absolutely not. You have to play the game right."

Mike, triple-smart as you say -- saw the value of emulating safety sessions like that, as well as having the huge benefit of engaging in many casual homeroom 14.1 competitions against Crane while still a teenager, in which high-level safety battles broke out periodically between them.

Within a few years Mike was running over 300 balls by age 19.

Arnaldo
 
When you watch it, be sure to set this formerly live-streamed video to the maximum 720p quality and you’ll find it’s plenty crisp and clear enough to easily read even the numbers on the balls (in the full-screen mode). The great video quality makes studying Sigel’s stroking and positional nuances (and the results of his minor but frequent miscalculations) much more effortless and thereby more entertaining, or at least quite involving.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSlaY9nMzGI

In spite of the advance notice in the title of this thread, for us Sigel fans the suspense never lets up as to how, when, and if any of the speed and angle miscalculations will soon end Mike’s run. Mike was never one to be shy about letting spectators know that some perceived minor or major problem or result is severely frustrating him. And then he overcomes it like a champion, until the next one presents itself just few minutes later.

This video amply shows that you can’t get into the smooth rhythm 14.1 demands with so many breaks in concentration occurring, so it’s quite amazing that Sigel manages to cobble together enough moments of sustained excellence alternating with pressure-related miscalculations to produce this run at his age.

It’s from the 2011 World 14.1 Championship. Blessed at least with the absence of a shot clock, Mike is ultra-fidgety, even nervous and head-shakingly indecisive throughout the first rack (also with a lot of vigorous and livid cue bumper carpet slamming) and you’d bet against anything but a short run.

But, via pure talent and the adrenaline of plenty of frustration-induced and even angry temperament, Mike fights his way through virtually all seven-plus racks in just about 60 minutes. His opponent, Oliver Ortmann is pinned to his chair, relegated to racking duties and simply watching/forebearing Mike’s continual struggle with the new and apparently overly fast (for Sigel) cloth.

Watching the video today, and silently rooting for the run to continue at every stumbling point, I couldn’t help occasionally thinking about CJ’s thought provoking observations regarding pro players’ shaft elevations, wrist engagements and apparent diverse gripping techniques . . .

. . . When he’s not shooting with an open bridge or shooting off a rail, most longtime Sigel fans are familiar with the unusual closed bridge he employs, with his palm typically *not* touching the cloth, his hand elevated onto three fingertips. I guess for him, it gives a special sensitivity to the variety of shaft elevations he employs as he’s precisely blending intended englishes. For us mere mortals, that bridge does feel mighty wobbly without a conventional palm contact.

Arnaldo

You're a great writer and, for the most part, this is a very good thread.
Post #6 mirrors my thoughts.
Post #10 is hilarious!
Post #11 I agree with whole-heartedly.
Post #12 I agree with even MORE whole-heartedly!
And Post #13 once again showed the classiness of Mr. Crane, who is without any doubt, one of the greatest 14.1'ers ever.
 
Back
Top