the mountain should get steeper the higher up the player climbs.
Yes, the CB and OBs and table get dirtier the longer the run goes on.
Perhaps the humidity (and sweat) factor goes up too. And that's what makes a high run so great.
We should't be putting escalators on Mt. Everest.
I'm hearing a contradiction here.
On the one hand you mention that many players make great runs without a single cleaning,
and play 1pocket the same way. That seems to imply that cleaning is unnecessary,
and that players can get the same results whether they clean or not.
On the other hand you liken it to 'putting an escalator on Mt. Everest',
implying it hugely increases the ease of getting results.
So is cleaning an unnecessary waste of time that has no relevance to the outcome?
Or is it a game-changer that has a huge impact on the outcome?
As an aside ---
There's an interesting article I read once on "Fake difficulty" in video games.
In a nutshell, it illustrates the distinction between a game that's hard because you can get
unlucky and die several times to random things you can't predict or control, and a game that's hard because
it demands really tricky timing or movement or coordination from the player.
Same outcome (the player ties a million times, keeps dying, and finally succeeds)
but one is rewarding for both the player and any spectator who appreciates skill,
and the other is... well... just boring bad luck.
Having to deal with skids is fake difficulty. The player didn't lose due to poor decision-making or poor execution.
He lost to bad luck. There's no value in that.
What makes high runs so great, isn't that the player managed not to get unlucky for hours.
It's the fact that their planning and execution are relentlessly consistent even as the pressure builds.
So what if everyone decides, "Oh. Having the CB cleaned every dozen or so shots
cuts down on skids. I think I'll start doing that."
Then, you have problems because of time, CBs and/or markers being dropped and moving balls
(like they were during LVC run), and you're introducing the likelihood of arguments about where exactly the CB was.
[snip] I mean, why stop at cleaning one ball when you have nine to 15 other potential culprits on the table?
This is a logical fallacy, though I can't recall the exact term for it.
"What if everyone started using Segways? People would get fat from not walking,
ramps would have to be installed for all buildings, cars would run into them more,
bicycle companies would go out of business!"
You're inventing a problem that doesn't exist and never will.
It's not an infectious disease. We're never going to see 500 people demand a full rack cleaning
every ten minutes. It's not like "clean balls = less skids" is some new thing players
just discovered in 2016 and we're at the start of a ten year ball-cleaning fad.
In the end, doesn't this boil down to "I got bored watching Lee Van's run because of the ball-cleaning?"
...that's fine, but it's Lee Van's run, and he paid money to enter, so of course he's going to value
keeping the cue ball clean more than he's going to value keeping viewers entertained
for those extra few seconds.