If you just want to be given a fish that may be true. If you want to learn to fish, it certainly isn't.
pj
chgo
No.
The how and the why are two different things.
If you just want to be given a fish that may be true. If you want to learn to fish, it certainly isn't.
pj
chgo
No.
The how and the why are two different things.
If you just want to be given a fish that may be true. If you want to learn to fish, it certainly isn't.
pj
chgo
How would that help those who are reading the misstatements here and now?JoeyA:
...ask them via PM if it would be all right for you to collaborate behind the scenes
How would that help those who are reading the misstatements here and now?
pj
chgo
I think you mistake the vocal few complaining here for the reading majority. Those who read here but don't post (I don't blame them) outnumber those who do post here by several magnitudes. And of those who do post here, those who post in these infomercial threads and complain about fact-correcting are a small fraction - I could probably name all of them from memory (this isn't our first rodeo).I enjoy reading some of your analysis PJ, but at some point you should probably accept people don't like unsolicited advice.
How would that help those who are reading the misstatements here and now?
pj
chgo
Then maybe you should sit at the feet of the experts of this sport and learn what it is and how they do it so well and differently and then explain their success in your own terms.
Who knows, even you might develop a fan base if you learned how their perceived techniques actually worked.
It isn't really necessary to run behind them correcting their every word or sentence. If you want to do that, ask them via PM if it would be all right for you to collaborate behind the scenes and be their PatChecker. Build some goodwill while you are dissiminating your perspectives. There's no need for the spite. The forum has moved on.
I think you mistake the vocal few complaining here for the reading majority. Those who read here but don't post (I don't blame them) outnumber those who do post here by several magnitudes. And of those who do post here, those who post in these infomercial threads and complain about fact-correcting are a small fraction - I could probably name all of them from memory (this isn't our first rodeo).
pj
chgo
LOL. I think it's obvious that I did.JoeyA:How would that help those who are reading the misstatements here and now?JoeyA:
...ask them via PM if it would be all right for you to collaborate behind the scenes
pj
chgo
You should have thought about that long ago.
Do we have any expert that would give PJ a free lesson as an experiment if he was willing to approach it with an open mind. He would find it useful or not useful. It seems that if he tried it and it didn't work, he could report why he didn't like it or visa versa. But most importantly it could bring the sides together so that everyone starts to view each other as people and not as usernames or avatars. There has to be a more logical way of breeding a culture of civility than just banning people. But that all starts with us... the users and keeping the moderator out of it.
But he points out the errors in the explanation behind the claims by only choosing to respond to a portion of what is being said, making derogatory remarks during his response, and overall being a total douche bag.
Is there a reasoning for your banter? We're you bullied or just ignored a lot?
Thanks for the bump!
Fixed that for ya....
I understand the techniques. The misstatements I correct are simple factual matters that don't address whether the techniques work, but how they do.Do we have any expert that would give PJ a free lesson as an experiment if he was willing to approach it with an open mind.
Well, he really hates those of us that have learned the Gospel of Stan "THE MAN" Shuffet.... "THE MAN" brought Pro One to the people and made CTE practical and make sense. PJ is somewhat of an aiming atheist and simply refuses to believe....
I've been out of the loop several years. I spoke to Hal via phone numerous occasions probably 5-6 years ago. Where do I find info on shuffets take on hal's stuff?
Also, is Hal still around or no longer with us?
Thanks