You're, not Your; within that specific context.
I respect your opinion on this subject. I am not a pool expert, by any means. I am just a poor old soul who wishes he would have had a table at home all his life. I've seen guys who took advantage of that, and they were calling 4 & 5 rail banks on me; and making those suckers too. Some Efren looking mess.
I know I said I was done here but, lol... I'm still here.
Ok, I'll bite again.
My advice:
Just say "ok", I was mistaken about the artistic player because I was really impressed by what I saw him do and just "assumed" that his artistic pool talents translates to a 1:1 ratio to pro pool players.
You said its "my opinion". Well, it a fact because:
I'm not pro material and he cant get there with me, not even close. So, if he cant get there with me, he's definitely nowhere close to pro speed.
If you dont know what Fargo rating is look it up and this will help:
I beat most players below 675ish.
Players above 675ish but below 710ish usually hold their own with me (~break even).
Players around 710ish, well, I have to be at my "VERY BEST" to just stay even.
Players above 730ish, well...I'm dead meat regardless of day, table, game, bet etc...
Now, having said the above, I believe his Fargo is around 600ish or lower. So, what does that tell you about your "assumption"?