^
Pandora's box.
Uh oh.
Pandora's box.
Uh oh.
Last edited:
Does heavier or/and denser means better?
What do you think of Gino talking about the holes and toothpicks to hold wraps being a "Wedge" that breaks the cue?
.
But I took what he said to mean that sometimes low growth rings are stiff and sometimes high growth ring shafts are noodles. I found the same thing goes for weight. Tight grain does not always mean heavier. But as a general rule I have found tighter grain to be heavier and stiffer and the opposite for really low growth ring count. But that is only a general rule. You find both stiff and noodles, light and heavy among both high and low growth ring count shafts.
Back to what this thread was about – “quarter cut”. I believe the person was probably referring to ‘quarter sawn’ and just made a mistake in what he was talking about. I could be wrong.
Now, let me say this and then I am out of here as I am much too busy to debate this issue that has been beaten to death. It’s all fantastic that all the newbies want to pick their own wood. They want to pack a tent and drive up into the wilderness with Jack the lumberman, camp overnight to chop down only the finest maple trees that exist in the most remote location of upper Michigan. They’ll use axes like real men because a chain saw will disturb and perhaps scare the molecular structure of this fine maple specimen. That night they roasted bacon over a hot open fire like our ancestors did hundreds of years before them. The next day, the newbie was up at the crack of dawn (nice place to wake up) chopping his felled tree into manageable sections. He had Jack (the lumberman) bring up the heavy equipment so as to put the logs gingerly on the flatbed but not before the UPS man delivered the mattresses from 1-800-mattres and we left the last ‘s’ off for the savings. Jack carefully placed the logs on the new mattresses and drove them back to the mill where this newbie cue maker could inspect each and every log to select only the finest log section for his shaft wood in the cues which have yet to be made or for the next 10 cues that he is going to make.
Once he selects (only the finest log), he then has Jack the lumberman quarter saw the log into perfect 5/4 lumber boards. Jack then kiln dries those boards, carefully of course, so that they meet the specifications and standards of the newbie cue maker who picks them up in 6 weeks. Or a variation of this is that the newbie cue maker doesn’t want Jack to kiln dry the boards because the newbie wants total control over his boards and he stickers them for the next 27 years to insure stability. Either way, let’s continue….
Once the newbie cue maker gets his boards dry, whether by kiln or roasting them over a hot open fire makes no difference in this scenario but eventually they are dry and the newbie goes through all the boards and then selects only those few boards which meet his stringent specifications for mass, weight, density, color, flavor and aroma. After he makes his selection of 3 boards, he then packs up and drives back to his home wherever that may be.
Upon returning home he lets these boards rest for another 843 days before he even thinks of cutting them because exceptional cue makers go through this process for their clients because they want to supply only the finest hand selected maple for use in their shafts. (ad nauseam)
Now, as ridiculous as the above sounds, this is what some people try to sell us and the public. Whether you buy wood from us or any number of suppliers of shaft wood, eventually you’ll find shafts that will be acceptable. You need to build a relationship with one supplier who has large quantities and can select the finest for your particular application. Let me say this, I’ve been there and done all that. The bottom-line, we buy our maple from two sources who know their wood and know what we’ve come to expect from them. When you find a supplier that does it right, you stick with them and we have.
You don’t need to go into the forest to get good wood. You only need to purchase from the right source who is receiving their wood from the correct area and processed in the correct manner. We don’t buy wood from upper New England, Wisconsin, New York or Pennsylvania. In our experience, New York and Pennsylvania have very light wood and low growth ring count. Wisconsin maple is cut for the furniture industry and that is a generalization but we’ve found it to be true as we do not care for processed Wisconsin maple. Michigan maple is best; without question.
Newbies who say that you can purchase shafts based on growth rings but don’t cry when you get bad shafts, simply don’t understand the process nor how shafts are selected. When you hunt around for the cheapest you get just that, the cheapest dried wood of which you have to cull out the good ones which are few. If that’s your experience then you would make ridiculous statements and use these new terms. However, when you purchase quality shaft wood, warping is almost non-existent which many don’t know or understand because they’re too busy in the forest of upper Michigan and also because they haven't experienced quality shaft wood. Keyword here is experience with quality and not with crap. If you purchase good wood, you get good wood. If you buy crap you get crap and warping is expected. The top line cue makers all buy shaft wood from suppliers like us for a reason. We have the quantity, the sources and most importantly, the buying power to get the best where the small newbie cue maker will never have the opportunity because they are a PITA to the serious mills who produce the finest maple for shaft wood. These mills do not want to deal with "cue makers"; period.
Successful businessmen and successful cue makers leave the process of selecting the finest shaft wood to the people who make a living doing that on a daily basis. Successful cue maker make cues. We don't know of any successful cue makers who sit for hours and hours and hours selecting 22 boards to cut their 50 shafts from.
So my friends, next time you hear people telling you that they pick their own trees or any variation on that nonsense, just remember it’s because they haven’t been doing this all that long. And then there is harmonics and bouncing…. Let’s not go there! :grin:
I’m outta here as I have a business to run and things to do so have at it and have a wonderful week.
So picking select dense planks before you cut your squares then doweling them yourself is just bad business because it is much better to get shafts from the pallet of thousands of wood squares from boards that are all over the place considering specifications you seek? Trees that are forested even from a great region have different attributes depending upon many environmental factors that were site specific for each tree. Picking singular planks that meets your criteria is a straight line algorithm.
Remember that wood is a very complex subject concerning certain attributes that exist within a narrow window or envelope for shaft selection. Each cue maker needs to find that area that suits them and QC is the way to do that. In the end when you taper them, finish them, observe in in the field and track how they stand up over time using QA control systems giving one feedback that is objective, only then do you have any control.
Yeah you can buy at lot of shafts and throw a big percentage away and divide the cost. That works. IMO I love the journey not just the destination. Call me silly. I have already been called cheap hear for my behavior and now by using a specific guidelines for purchasing wood I am just a newbie because I choose to have more control of the process. I choose to use my brain, not get sucked into the urban legend about classifying shaft wood by counting rings. That is just sophomoric since there are clearly other attributes other than just that. Now I am labled as a newbie, I think not, anyone who has visited my shop would not have that same view. I guess I must be one of the so called "Nickel Dime" AZers that has been spewed here before.
You can label anybody any way you want but in the end every cue maker has a choice on how they want their river of wood to flow in their own shop.
When using logic A+B=C not A+B= what some other person wants to force feed you into believing. That is pretty obvious!
JMO,
Rick
I've used a similar scale setting( originally done for golf shafts) on pool shafts.
And you never know for sure. Usually more is stiffer, but you can't just look at ring count and
say it's a broom stick. Same with low. Maybe if they all came from the same tree, but not if random lots.
I've cried as I threw out 20+ rpi shafts that just fuzzed up and weighed nothing.
I haven't handled as many shafts as a dealer, but I have 800 in house right now plus what ever
I've used in 16 years. Those 800 started as around about 900. 100 culled and thrown out. A surprising number of those were over 10 rpi
I'd pay money to see Joe and Bob in a debate.
I remember It being a popular belief that Higher rpi shafts equated to stiffness or density, and so that was one impression that I kept in mind, but over time My observations have been the same. It can go either way, but I have had experiences before where very low ring counts were much stiffer, and played much better then higher ring counts. I have also had lower ring counts that peeled nicely while cutting, and higher ring counts that were more fuzzy. I wouldn't say It's the norm, just saying that IMO sometimes looks or popular belief can be deceiving.
Cue Crazy I remember It being a popular belief that Higher rpi shafts equated to stiffness or density said:This is an example where observation and critical thinking defeats urban legends.
Rick
scdiveteam; said:]
This is an example where observation and critical thinking defeats urban legends.
Rick
That's urban legend imo . Well, actually it's not an urban legend b/c it goes against the normal thinking.I also agree with Steve that lower rings equates to a stiffer playing shaft. For me 8 to 12 is where I like to be.
That's urban legend imo . Well, actually it's not an urban legend b/c it goes against the normal thinking.
Worse, Steve did not say that. You misquoted him.
![]()
If we follow your take, the wide grained parts of that board ( more than likely ), will be stiffer than the tighter grained parts of that board ( I don't think it'll stay straight but we'll just talk stiffness and density) .
From my experience, that's more of an anomaly, not the norm. But, stiff low ring count woods do exist. Nothing wrong with 8-12 straight grained heavy shafts either.
If lower ring count woods are stiffer than higher ring count woods ( normally or on the average) as you say, ok.
No biggie.
Yeah, should have said can or offen equates.
I said also twice here that there are very good shafts that have high growth rings, we all know that. Choosing shafts by ring count alone is not a good method by itself.
No biggie either.