would you score balls of your group pocketed by the other team?
It's called ball count. Individual win lose games do not apply. You get 8 balls for a win and a lesser nmbr for the lose.
would you score balls of your group pocketed by the other team?
Strange. Never heard of a format like that. We do the round-robin style 5-on-5 here in Portland.
Why would you get a point for a ball pocketed on a scratch, sounds odd to me.
They would have gotten the point for the stripe that the breaker made while scratching?
I'd say a loss for complete failure to understand how the match is scored is appropriate.
Still looking for a ruling, in case it ever pops it's ugly head again.
Thanks.
In our league we have 4 to a team. Each player plays each other so there could be 16 games played. Once a team reaches 128 balls the match is OVER. Remaining games do not need to be played.
Several members have voiced disagreement with all balls stay down even made when a foul has been committed. When u have an open table there,s no reason why you can't reach down in the tray and spot it back up including the break.You could legally use the other teams ball or the eight ball in a combo for the 128 ball and the win.
Somebody pleas check my math. 16 games times a max of 8 balls per game is only 128 balls. So the only way to get to 128 would be to win all 16 games?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Why would it happen? You have ball in hand. Take the stripes, already having one in, run out your three. Even if the stripes are sitting poorly you need to try them or lose
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The math is right, but they may give 3 points for the 8 (or as my league does it, the winner automatically gets 10 points even if the opponent say makes the 8 in the wrong pocket).
What I don't get is the 128 max. My league uses ball count (plus handicap) but it depends on the final total points.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Somebody pleas check my math. 16 games times a max of 8 balls per game is only 128 balls. So the only way to get to 128 would be to win all 16 games?
Your absolutely correct.
In league playoffs you play untill one teams reaches the 128 balls. It may take 5 or 6 or more
Your exactly right, but some people don't put 2@2 together.
Still looking for a ruling, in case it ever pops it's ugly head again.
Thanks.
The answer to the question "What is the BCA(PL) rule" is that you are not playing the game according to BCAPL rules, you are playing according to your own league rules. Therefore the people you should ask are your league officers.
I run a league. Have for almost 15 years. And if I had a say as to this matter I would rule that in order to win the match you must have at least 128 points AND be at the table. Thus, when the non-breaker sinks a ball his opponent does have 128 points but he is not AT the table. Should the non-breaker miss before reaching 129, then the breaker wins.
The answer to the question "What is the BCA(PL) rule" is that you are not playing the game according to BCAPL rules, you are playing according to your own league rules. Therefore the people you should ask are your league officers.
I run a league. Have for almost 15 years. And if I had a say as to this matter I would rule that in order to win the match you must have at least 128 points AND be at the table. Thus, when the non-breaker sinks a ball his opponent does have 128 points but he is not AT the table. Should the non-breaker miss before reaching 129, then the breaker wins.
Good point. What if you are at 126 and your opponent is at 127 and you make ball number 127 and their 128 in the same shot
128 ends the match. Shooter loses.
Eight ball for points is dumb imo, no offense. Having said that, your captain ought to think about what their role on the team is. If it's not to tell his teammate to elect the proper balls then what is it? You all clearly should have known it would have counted one you elected solids. You were the ones arguing, the other team was just telling you you lost. Get over it.
OK, but you are counting the ball made for the breaker. That being the case, since the point counts even on a scratch, did he not reach 128 while he was at the table? Assuming the OB went in before the CB, his inning didn't end until the CB dropped.
Not disagreeing with your take, just playing devil's advocate. I'm not sure what the rules would be nor if they even address this situation. But again, I have trouble with someone winning on a foul. That said however, in the more normal format of my league, in this exact situation a player coming to the table in the last game of a round could lose the round for his team simply by taking the wrong group.