Whats happening with the WPBA Tour?

basically the same deal

av84fun said:
All I am saying is that for the lender to jack someone's interest rate to 31% because they missed the due date by a few days on ONE payment is sickening.

And right, you and I would just pay it off and never use that bank again but the poor slob who just got laid off or is in the hospital (which is what happened to my friend) may not be able to pay off the card.

Regards,
Jim

Jim,

At a little over seven percent there was no reason to pay off that credit card so I had let the balance build although I paid several times the minimum payment most months and never paid minimum. What they were betting on when they squeezed me was the same thing they were betting on when they squeezed your friend, that neither of us could pay. I was lucky, I could pay but my money was earning more than I was giving the credit card company so I didn't want to until they jacked the rate. They should have been happy instead of trying to rape me. Had they raised the rate to the roughly 11% of my other cards I would have just paid it off and kept the card. Note the less than eight percent wasn't an introductory thing, it had been there for several years. They just figured the running balance meant I was in a bind and tried to squeeze me.

As for collection guru, sounds like he tried to do a good thing out of the goodness of his heart. I have to admit that if someone representing a credit card company told me they wanted to do something for me out of the goodness of their heart I would weld steel boiler plate into the seat of my longjohns. That sounds a lot like I'm from the IRS and I am here to help you!

Hu
 
Scott Lee said:
Melissa...Thank you for your comments. I would personally have to side with Dave on the term "regrettable decisions". The WPBA board has certainly appeared to make some less than intelligent decisions recently. I will be happy to point one out...purely from my perspective. The WPBA had the opportunity, AT NO COST to the organization (and with 0% of any revenues going to the originator of the project), to take advantage of a credit card program that would have put the faces of WPBA members on credit cards, and generated immediate substancial income for both the organization and the individual players. Would some players have received more financial gain, as a result of a higher degree of 'popularity'? Yes...even so, for the board to not even consider this proposal was, in my mind, a 'regrettable decision'! This would have been a highly visible way to mainstream women's professional billiards, as well as a viable way to support your favorite WPBA players! This is just one example...

Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com

Hi Scott,

So, reading Guru's post clears a little bit up....but it also only proves my point. He clearly states that he brought it to members of a past board...not this board. I mention it again not to prove you wrong or say I told you so in anyway....but to show that any slight misunderstanding in information can be harmful if passed on as gospel. You posted a message saying that the WPBA Board has made some questionable choices recently...but this wasn't recent (I've been on the board a year)...and it wasn't a board decision.

I'm not bashing you or anyone else...please understand that. I am simply saying that life can be like a game of post office. Someone hears something, and then it gets slightly twisted in the translation, and then it gets twisted some more in the next translation, and so on. That's just the way of life.

People have been hearing things...hence this post questioning the WPBA Boards decision making and judgement. My only point was, and still is, that if just one little part of a story in incomplete or incorrect...then it is completely unfair to pass such judgement.

The WPBA is alive and kicking. Each year, we face obstacles...some more difficult than others. But we make it through...and nothing will be different this year.

I thank everyone for their support...and just ask again that people keep an open mind no matter what they hear.

Best Regards and Happy Holidays,

Melissa Herndon
 
Melissa...I was under the impression that it was quite recent (within the past year). Only CG can clear that up. At the same time, I AM privy to PL Productions' letter of resignation (which is VERY recent...within the last month), which VERY clearly states the reasons why they decided to leave the relationship with the WPBA...and it WASN'T problems with the players! As such, I maintain that David's initial post was still spot on, and I happen to agree with him! Please don't take this to mean I don't support women's professional pool, or the WPBA...I most certainly do, and wish them the best of luck in dealing with the coming year(s). They have a 100x better track record than the professional men.

Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
 
Melissa Herndon said:
I am simply saying that life can be like a game of post office. Someone hears something, and then it gets slightly twisted in the translation, and then it gets twisted some more in the next translation, and so on. That's just the way of life.

Melissa,

Where can we get the full story? If that knowledge is not shared, then you can expect this to continue ad nauseum. I'm not saying that you have to share everything, or even that you should, but if it isn't put out there for public consumption, then you are going to have critics attempting to put the puzzle together with what information they do have, or even don't have. Unfortunately, you can't tell people not to speculate because...well...they're people. It's what we do. Why is the sky blue? Why is grass green? Why didn't the WPBA stick a gun to pl promotions head and make them stay? I exaggerate, but I hope you get my meaning. I hope things continue to get better for everyone involved, as you (read the ladies of the WPBA) are testament to pool being a viable professional sport. Good luck.
 
Collection Guru..."NO ONE ON THE PLANET HAS THE BROADNESS OF MY RISK MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE OR FOR THAT MATTER..."

That comment speaks for itself and is a major clue regarding the credibility of the balance of your post.

Jim
 
ShootingArts..."I have to admit that if someone representing a credit card company told me they wanted to do something for me out of the goodness of their heart I would weld steel boiler plate into the seat of my longjohns. That sounds a lot like I'm from the IRS and I am here to help you!"

LMAO
(-:
 
shakes...You can only bang your head against the wall so many times, before the headaches don't outweigh the 'perceived' benefits! You can probably figure out for yourself who was doing the head banging...and with whom!

Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com

shakes said:
Why didn't the WPBA stick a gun to pl promotions head and make them stay? I exaggerate, but I hope you get my meaning.
 
Last edited:
This thread has gone exactly where it didn't need to go, however due to the fact that I have been told by several that I don't know what I am talking about, I will elaborate on what I do know about this situation - which I will admit - comes nowhere close to the knowledge Melissa has. I am posting this to clear the air, not to pass along any top secret info.

When I responded initially, I made some personal comments about the situation. I made those comments based on documentation I have obtained about this incident, speaking with some of the WPBA players, and from trying to look at this situation diplomatically. I won't pretend to be on one side or the other. The important work that needs to be done is finding a replacement for PL Promotions. Spawning rumors or keeping people in the dark about some issues will only make that more difficult for the WPBA Board. Field you questions to Melissa - she knows more than I do.

I used the words "regrettable decisions". It rubbed Melissa the wrong way, although it was not inended to do that. Melissa and I are friends and I hope our friendship is stronger than a bunch of political pool nonsense that will eventually be another chapter in the history of the WPBA. Perhaps "regrettable" was a poor choice of words, but at the end of this thread, you will understand why I used them.

My personal felings are much different than my professional view of this situation. Personally, I still believe that at some point the loss of PL Promotions will have negative consequences. These consequences are completely unavoidable, yet not life threatening to the WPBA. Hopefully those consequences will be temporary and the WPBA will thirve and follow through as it always has. Professionally, I understand that the loss of PL Promotions is a strong test of strength for the WPBA, it's players, and its board members.

Like Scott, I have read PL Promotion's resignation, and it does not paint a pretty picture. I won't post this document in this forum. That is between PL and the WPBA, and FWIW its none of my business.

In a nutshell, PL's dealing with the BCA were looked upon as a conflict of interest and they were left out of the negotians/discussions for the 2008 BCA event. They were never contacted prior to the negotiations.

They felt as if they could no longer serve the WPBA and they have resigned. In a letter to the players, Peg said -

PL Promotions has reluctantly come to the realization that the philosophical differences between the WPBA Board of Directors and our company are not compatible.

Neither party is right or wrong in this situation, we just don't agree on several levels and moving forward without the same game plan is not in the best interest of the WPBA and/or PL Promotions. Sometimes major changes are needed to move forward...............


There was an uproar amongst some of the players that felt as if there was a need for an inquiry into the board and its decision making abilities.

You must understand that at the time of PL's resignation, there were several sponsor contracts and venue contracts that remained to be finalized for the 2008 season. Combine that with the fact that PL Promotions is responsible for the tear down, set up and transport of the WPBA equipment (from venue to venue). PL Promotions operates the WPBA office which makes it responsible for the day to day operations of the tour, as well as dissimentating information to the WPBA players. They are not the grease that oils the wheel, for the most part they ARE the wheel.

This is why some of the players have been very worried about this situation and rightfully so. There are "rumors" that the board had been playing hardball with industry sponsors that have been keeping them afloat for years.

Like I said, that is a rumor, I don't know the specifics. All I know is that a player (who I will keep anonymous) led the charge at the WPBA event in Oregon to inquire about the decisions and practices of the current board. This was done professionally and it received a professional response from WPBA President Linda Chen.

In regards to the "conflict of interest between PL and the BCA", the WPBA Board's stance in accordance with their by-laws. Here is Linda Chen's statement on that -

PL is the producer of the BCA event. The WPBA board felt it would be a conflict of interest to have PL involved with Board discussions and decisions regarding this event, PL did not agree. Unfortunately, the Board was guilty of an unintentional oversight of informing PL before the BCA was contacted. *

There you have it. An unintentional oversight. Regrettable, however unavoidable.

Also in Linda's defense (as well as the WPBA Board) they were in the process of looking at and correcting weaknesses in several areas of their contract with PL Promotions. PL resigned before this was completed.

As far as the personality conflicts between players and members of the board - I'll stay out of all of that - as it really doesn't stand a chance - as the by-laws dictate what the board can and cannot do.

I hope this clears the air on this topic - Melissa - correct any errors in what I have put in here. I did not disclose anything that can be construed as or interpreted as rumor, if there is something that needs to be removed from this post - tell me and I will edit it.
 
Last edited:
I Knew This Was A Mistake

ShootingArts said:
Jim,

At a little over seven percent there was no reason to pay off that credit card so I had let the balance build although I paid several times the minimum payment most months and never paid minimum. What they were betting on when they squeezed me was the same thing they were betting on when they squeezed your friend, that neither of us could pay. I was lucky, I could pay but my money was earning more than I was giving the credit card company so I didn't want to until they jacked the rate. They should have been happy instead of trying to rape me. Had they raised the rate to the roughly 11% of my other cards I would have just paid it off and kept the card. Note the less than eight percent wasn't an introductory thing, it had been there for several years. They just figured the running balance meant I was in a bind and tried to squeeze me.

As for collection guru, sounds like he tried to do a good thing out of the goodness of his heart. I have to admit that if someone representing a credit card company told me they wanted to do something for me out of the goodness of their heart I would weld steel boiler plate into the seat of my longjohns. That sounds a lot like I'm from the IRS and I am here to help you!

Hu

I WAS REPRESENTING THE WPBA AND THE BILLIARD INDUSTRY NOT THE CREDIT CARD ISSUER!!!!!! I ASKED A FRIEND FOR A CHIP TO HELP POOL; I WENT TO THEM NOT THE BIG BAD CREDIT CARD PEOPLE COMING TO ME. IT IS PITIFUL THAT PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO LEARN WHICH IS EXACTLY THE PROBLEM WITH THE FOLKS I OFFERED THIS TOO; THEY HAD NO CLUE OF WHAT AN AFFINITY CARD IS AND HOW IT WORKED. YOU GUYS NOT LISTENING TO MY GENUINE EFFORT TO HELP PEOPLE IS LIKE ME TEACHING BUSTAMANTE TO BREAK; NUTTY.

IF ANY OF YOU WANT TO LEARN ABOUT CREDIT, CREDIT CARDS, AFFINITY PROGRAMS I AM EASY TO FIND AT THE DCC; AS DANNY SAYS, I LOOK LIKE BOB HOPE ND MY WIFE LOOKS LIKE JEANETTE LEE. ( SORRY DANNY, COULDN'T RESIST)
 
CG,

Please.

Stop yelling.

Everyone's perfectly capable of reading normal sized text.
 
Ok, You Are An Idiot

av84fun said:
Collection Guru..."NO ONE ON THE PLANET HAS THE BROADNESS OF MY RISK MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE OR FOR THAT MATTER..."

That comment speaks for itself and is a major clue regarding the credibility of the balance of your post.

Jim

JIM, I WAS HONORED BY THE CREDIT CARD AND COLLECTION INDUSTRY WITH LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD HOSTED BY WAYNE NEWTON AND ZOWIE BOWIE AT THE WYNN HOTEL. THIS WAS THE SECOND AWARD I WAS AWARDED AFTER I RETIRED THE FIRST TIME IN 1991. 700 PEOPLE PAID $1000 TO ATTEND THE DINNER AND SHOW WHICH EVENTUALLY RAISED $250,000 FOR A CALIFORNIA CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL.
I WAS ORIGINALLY CALLED THE "LEGEND" WHICH I FELT EMBARRASSED ABOUT BUT ACCEPTED THE COLLECTION GURU TAG. MY NAME IS JOHN ROUSSEAU, THEY NAMED ME THE COLLECTION GURU!; KIND OF LIKE EFREN BEING CALLED THE "MAGICIAN"- GET IT?

SORRY YOU ARE UNABLE TO ANNOUNCE YOU ARE THE BEST ON THE PLANET BUT I CONFIDENTLY ANNOUNCE WHAT OTHERS THINK OF ME. I RECEIVE A REASONABLE HOURLY RATE TO CONSULT WITH MANY OF THE ALLEGED LEADERS AND CAN FIX OR IMPROVE THEIR PROCESS VERY QUICKLY.

I KNEW THIS WAS A MISTAKE; YOUR INSECURITIES MIRROR THOSE OF PEOPLE I HAVE TRIED TO HELP AND FIND IT DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND THEY DON'T KNOW EVERYTHING LIKE YOU.
 
Collection Guru..."SORRY YOU ARE UNABLE TO ANNOUNCE YOU ARE THE BEST ON THE PLANET BUT I CONFIDENTLY ANNOUNCE WHAT OTHERS THINK OF ME."

Hey, if you need to view yourself in that light...knock your socks off.
Again, your pronouncements speak for themselves.

"SORRY YOU ARE UNABLE TO ANNOUNCE YOU ARE THE BEST ON THE PLANET BUT I CONFIDENTLY ANNOUNCE WHAT OTHERS THINK OF ME. "

If I was, I would not feel the slightest need to announce it.

And your resorting to name calling is also unfortunate.

Jim
 
Jimmy

av84fun said:
Collection Guru..."SORRY YOU ARE UNABLE TO ANNOUNCE YOU ARE THE BEST ON THE PLANET BUT I CONFIDENTLY ANNOUNCE WHAT OTHERS THINK OF ME."

Hey, if you need to view yourself in that light...knock your socks off.
Again, your pronouncements speak for themselves.

"SORRY YOU ARE UNABLE TO ANNOUNCE YOU ARE THE BEST ON THE PLANET BUT I CONFIDENTLY ANNOUNCE WHAT OTHERS THINK OF ME. "

If I was, I would not feel the slightest need to announce it.

And your resorting to name calling is also unfortunate.

Jim

JIM, AS YOU WON'T LISTEN TO SOMEONE WHO HAS EXCELLED WORLDWIDE IN THE CREDIT CARD AND CHARGE CARD INDUSTRY WHEN YOU READ HEADLINES ABOUT SUB-PRIME LOSSES WHICH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE WPBA PROGRAM, I JUST POINTED OUT THAT MY RECOGNITION CAME FROM PEERS NOT ME. I AM A MAVERICK WHO USES MY FREEDOM TO TRY AND HELP OTHERS WITH MY KNOWLEDGE GAINED NOT BECASUE I AM A GENIUS BUT HAD THE GUTS TO LEARN IN ALL AREAS OF RISK MANAGEMENT WORLDWIDE WITHOUT FEAR OF FAILURE. WHILE I HAVE MADE MISTAKES, I LEARNED FROM THEM AND THEY ARE NEVER REPEATED BY ME OR PEOPLE WHO WORKED FOR ME WHO NOW OCCUPY SENIOR JOBS WORLWIDE IN THE RISK MANAGEMENT AREA OF THE CREDIT CYCLE.YCLE.

[SIZE="5"]] BY THE WAY JIM, YOUR FRIEND WITH PRISTINE CREDIT WHO ACCEPTED A CREDIT CARD WITH INTEREST RATES DISCLOSED TO REACH 31% AFTER MISSING ONE PAYMENT IS VIRGINAL ON THE BASIS OF THEIR READING SKILLS AND/OR MAYBE THEY MISLEAD YOU ABOUT THEIR CREDIT SCORE. MAY I SUGGEST THEY CHECK THEIR CREDIT SCORE AT WWW.ANNUALCREDITREPORT.COM FROM ONE OF THE THREE CREDIT BUREAUS AS MAYBE THEY HAVE A DEROG THEY ARE NOT AWARE OF OR MAYBE THEY LIED?
[/SIZE][/COLOR]
JIM, YOU CALLED ME WRONG WHEN YOU NOTHING OF THE PROPOSAL, THE BANK, THE OPPORTUNITIES FOR BILLIARDS, CREDIT QUALITY, WHO OWNS THE RECEIVABLE, ETC; THAT PLACES YOUR COMMENTS IN THE DICTIONARY NEXT TO IDIOT.


SCOTT, TO SAVE TIME I WILL INCLUDE MY RESPONSE TO YOUR CAP COMMENT.INSECURITY SUCKS[/COLOR]


BY THE WAY, ON YOUR LIST OF QUALITIES, YOU FORGOT ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND RESULTS; NO ONE CARES HOW HARD YOU WORK JUST THE RESULTS. BY THE WAY, I AM NOT YELLING; WHEN EVERYONE LEARNS TO SPELL, PUNCTUATE, ETC., I WILL THEN CONFORM; MAYBE?
 
reading skills and insecurities

COLLECTION GURU said:
I WAS REPRESENTING THE WPBA AND THE BILLIARD INDUSTRY NOT THE CREDIT CARD ISSUER!!!!!! I ASKED A FRIEND FOR A CHIP TO HELP POOL; I WENT TO THEM NOT THE BIG BAD CREDIT CARD PEOPLE COMING TO ME. IT IS PITIFUL THAT PEOPLE DON'T WANT TO LEARN WHICH IS EXACTLY THE PROBLEM WITH THE FOLKS I OFFERED THIS TOO; THEY HAD NO CLUE OF WHAT AN AFFINITY CARD IS AND HOW IT WORKED. YOU GUYS NOT LISTENING TO MY GENUINE EFFORT TO HELP PEOPLE IS LIKE ME TEACHING BUSTAMANTE TO BREAK; NUTTY.

IF ANY OF YOU WANT TO LEARN ABOUT CREDIT, CREDIT CARDS, AFFINITY PROGRAMS I AM EASY TO FIND AT THE DCC; AS DANNY SAYS, I LOOK LIKE BOB HOPE ND MY WIFE LOOKS LIKE JEANETTE LEE. ( SORRY DANNY, COULDN'T RESIST)



CG.

I tried to respect your age but since you chose to reply to me in this fashion I will point out some home truths. You are the TERRIBLY INSECURE PERSON who can't quit typing in all caps because by your own admission a few people would think they had made you do it and you can't have that.

Secondly, you claim to have represented the WPBA without authorization to do so. I question both the wisdom and legality of such actions.

Finally there is the nature of your reply to me when I gave you the benefit of the doubt and granted that it sounded like you had done something out of the goodness of your heart without expectation of personal benefit. Since all of your prior posts acknowledged that you were not authorized to act for the WPBA, it seemed reasonable to assume you represented the other party. It now appears that you represented nobody but yourself which makes me very skeptical that you weren't planning to make a buck since you now say you were negotiating with both parties.

You included plenty of exclamation points in your reply to me to leave no doubt you were yelling for no reason other than either a joking comment about credit card companies and the IRS or YOUR INABILITY TO READ AND COMPREHEND SINCE I SAID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING BAD ABOUT YOU BUT JUST THE OPPOSITE!!
(see how much better cap's and exclamation points work when used properly?)

Hu
 
av84fun said:
This may be gettting the thread off on the tangent line..but my "day job" is in the world of investment management and I can tell you for a fact that there is a train wreck brewing in the credit card world that will be AT LEAST as significant as what is happening in the mortage market.

Simply put, a huge percentage of credit card issuers are "predatory lenders" and the resulting defaults on credit cards are SKYROCKETING as this is being written.

I have one client with a pristine payment record who had one of her credit card interest rates jacked to 31% because she was a few days late ON ONE SINGLE PAYMENT!

That sort of thing is happening all over America and I guarantee you will make national headlines when the investment media begins to pick up on stories like that.

I have no idea what led the WPBA board to take a pass on associating itself with any particular credit card issuer but if the above scenario had anything to do with it then the board is to be congratulated not criticized.

Regards,
Jim
EDIT: This was posted before I read Melissa's direct response.
They just had the credit card companies up in Congress a few weeks ago on this very issue. The Congress was BBQing the credit card CEO's (and rightfully so).

On topic , for the past several years I have admired the womens pro tour while the mens languished. I hope they will continue to have success.


I record all of their matches in ESPNC.

SR
 
ShootingArts said:
CG.

I tried to respect your age but since you chose to reply to me in this fashion I will point out some home truths. You are the TERRIBLY INSECURE PERSON who can't quit typing in all caps because by your own admission a few people would think they had made you do it and you can't have that.

Secondly, you claim to have represented the WPBA without authorization to do so. I question both the wisdom and legality of such actions.

Finally there is the nature of your reply to me when I gave you the benefit of the doubt and granted that it sounded like you had done something out of the goodness of your heart without expectation of personal benefit. Since all of your prior posts acknowledged that you were not authorized to act for the WPBA, it seemed reasonable to assume you represented the other party. It now appears that you represented nobody but yourself which makes me very skeptical that you weren't planning to make a buck since you now say you were negotiating with both parties.

You included plenty of exclamation points in your reply to me to leave no doubt you were yelling for no reason other than either a joking comment about credit card companies and the IRS or YOUR INABILITY TO READ AND COMPREHEND SINCE I SAID ABSOLUTELY NOTHING BAD ABOUT YOU BUT JUST THE OPPOSITE!!
(see how much better cap's and exclamation points work when used properly?)

Hu

MELISSA; THIS GUY IS ALL WET; IF YOU WANT ME TO BRING YOU UP TO SPEED WITHOUT NAMES I WILL BE GLAD TO DO IT BUT NOT ANYMORE ON THIS SITE.

HUH:1. I WILL TYPE ANY WAY I WANT AS DO THE OTHERS ON THIS SITE
HAVE THAT FREEDOM.
2. I OFFERED TO MANAGE THE WPBA LED AFFINITY PROGRAM PRO-
BONO. TRUDEAU AND I DISCUSSED THE SAME THING AND I WAS
GOING TO CHARGE HIM AS HE TOLD ME HE DOESN'T DO ANYTHING
UNLESS HE MAKES MONEY SO FOR HIM, I WOULDN'T EITHER.
3. I THREATEND THE MAYOR OF PHOENIX, SKIP REMZA, TO ALLOW
ME TO FIX HIS TAX AND FINE COLLECTION PROCESS OR I WOULD
GO TO TV AND PAPERS; HEAD OF DEPARTMENT CALLED ME ON
SUNDAY TO ACCEPT OFFER (THREAT) SOUND INSECURE TO YOU?
4. EVERYONE I HAVE MET FROM THIS SITE HAS BEEN AWESOME AND
YOU PROBABLY ARE AS WELL. I AM NOT A LIAR, CAPS ARE NOT YELLING FROM ME, AND I AM CONSTANTLY TRYING TO HELP OTHERS AS
I HAVE LED A CHARMED LIFE AND ENJOY HELPING OTHERS THAT I
LIKE.

FORGET MY AGE AS I RECEIVED THE RESPECT I TREASURE FROM MY PEERS WHO PRONOUNCED ME AS THE COLLECTION GURU.

HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL OF YOU; FOR THE LAST TIME WE WERE
NOT TALKING SUB-PRIME BORROWERS!!!!!!!!! ( YELLING)
SO IF I PISS YOU OFF, THE HELL WITH YOU AS YOU HAVE ME PEGGED
WRONG.
 
the proof is in front of us

You have been in several threads lately that brought you to my attention. In each of these threads what you have said spoke even louder than your cap's that you can't drop for appearing to be weak. I can't lay claim to being the best in the world at anything. However I am strong enough to admit when I am doing something that is irritating and hard to read for all posters to punish a few and change my ways.

On these forums you are judged by your actions here and in the pool world. Considering the status you claim, you should find your actions deeply embarrassing. You just dig yourself in deeper with every post. First you claim to have represented the WPBA without any authority to do so and now you brag in public about making threats and blackmailing the mayor of Phoenix? All of this in an effort to impress lil' ol' me? WOW! Considering your august position that must make me like a god! :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
(emoticons are handy tools too)


Hu




COLLECTION GURU said:
MELISSA; THIS GUY IS ALL WET; IF YOU WANT ME TO BRING YOU UP TO SPEED WITHOUT NAMES I WILL BE GLAD TO DO IT BUT NOT ANYMORE ON THIS SITE.

HUH:1. I WILL TYPE ANY WAY I WANT AS DO THE OTHERS ON THIS SITE
HAVE THAT FREEDOM.
2. I OFFERED TO MANAGE THE WPBA LED AFFINITY PROGRAM PRO-
BONO. TRUDEAU AND I DISCUSSED THE SAME THING AND I WAS
GOING TO CHARGE HIM AS HE TOLD ME HE DOESN'T DO ANYTHING
UNLESS HE MAKES MONEY SO FOR HIM, I WOULDN'T EITHER.
3. I THREATEND THE MAYOR OF PHOENIX, SKIP REMZA, TO ALLOW
ME TO FIX HIS TAX AND FINE COLLECTION PROCESS OR I WOULD
GO TO TV AND PAPERS; HEAD OF DEPARTMENT CALLED ME ON
SUNDAY TO ACCEPT OFFER (THREAT) SOUND INSECURE TO YOU?
4. EVERYONE I HAVE MET FROM THIS SITE HAS BEEN AWESOME AND
YOU PROBABLY ARE AS WELL. I AM NOT A LIAR, CAPS ARE NOT YELLING FROM ME, AND I AM CONSTANTLY TRYING TO HELP OTHERS AS
I HAVE LED A CHARMED LIFE AND ENJOY HELPING OTHERS THAT I
LIKE.

FORGET MY AGE AS I RECEIVED THE RESPECT I TREASURE FROM MY PEERS WHO PRONOUNCED ME AS THE COLLECTION GURU.

HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL OF YOU; FOR THE LAST TIME WE WERE
NOT TALKING SUB-PRIME BORROWERS!!!!!!!!! ( YELLING)
SO IF I PISS YOU OFF, THE HELL WITH YOU AS YOU HAVE ME PEGGED
WRONG.
 
Back
Top