Where do your eyes look?

WesleyW said:
You are talking nonsens! If that's true, you shouldn't have to aim anymore. Just watch the OB and play.


Because you still have to line up the shot no matter what you are aiming at!
 
I wonder how many peoples have train there stroke with a bottle. I think most of the peoples knows the trick. Just stroke a few times with your tip/shaft into the bottle without touching the bottle. I really want to know what the results are for the most of the players, when looking at the opening of the bottle and looking behind the bottle.
 
WesleyW said:
I wonder how many peoples have train there stroke with a bottle. I think most of the peoples knows the trick. Just stroke a few times with your tip/shaft into the bottle without touching the bottle. I really want to know what the results are for the most of the players, when looking at the opening of the bottle and looking behind the bottle.


If you have a really good pendulum stroke then that method of training is pretty much useless because after you strike the cue ball the tip of the cue should be starting to head downward towards the table. Therefore you will hit the bottle every time if you are doing the pendulum stroke properly.

The only time the cue needs to be level in a normal shot is when you actually strike the cue ball!

A better stroke trainer is Joe Tucker's system!
 
WesleyW said:
... You should talk to some great snookerplayers and ask them how they aim. They will always tell you to look at the CB.
I don't think so. Do you have any written reference? The other factor is that people don't always do what they say (or believe that they do). How about youtube videos of snooker champs in which eye movement is clear?

One could do far worse than have the fundamentals of Alison Fisher. She is very, very methodical in her eye movement. She plays snooker fairly well. She does not do as you claim.
 
WesleyW said:
I've heard a few world class snookerplayers saying, always focus at the CB when shooting, because if you have alligned the patron and you hit the CB 100% correct, the CB will always do the thing what you're hoping for. It's the contact between the tip en CB that does the job. Looking at the OB only gives you an astimate where to shoot. I would say, play a few times snooker, and you will know why it's more effectively to look at the CB. It's way to difficult to shoot a long range shot with snooker, if you look at the OB when pulling the trigger.
If I were to say 'Absolute bollocks' would you know what I meant? Your cue follows your eye. Look where you want to send the ball and there it goes. That's how snooker players do it. You absolutely must look toward the object ball if you want to be accurate. Forget potting anything over 3 foot on a snooker table otherwise. This is actually rule 2 of snooker - "Always look at the object ball at impact". Rule 1 is 'Never look at the cue ball at impact'.

Boro Nut
 
Boro Nut said:
If I were to say 'Absolute bollocks' would you know what I meant? Your cue follows your eye. Look where you want to send the ball and there it goes. That's how snooker players do it. You absolutely must look toward the object ball if you want to be accurate. Forget potting anything over 3 foot on a snooker table otherwise. This is actually rule 2 of snooker - "Always look at the object ball at impact". Rule 1 is 'Never look at the cue ball at impact'.

Boro Nut

Look at the first shot of John Higgins:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TB0_7f5ft4&mode=related&search=

When John takes the trigger, his eyebrow went down. After he pulled the trigger, hit eyebrow follows the CB and went up. You can argue if he is really looking at the CB. But if he is looking at the OB, his eyebrow need to get up.
 
whitewolf said:
Earl and Scott are the only top players I know who look at the cueball last. But who is to say how good they could have been if they had started looking at the object ball last?!!!!!!

I am curious, why do you think Earl looks at the cueball last?
 
WesleyW said:
... When John takes the trigger, his eyebrow went down. After he pulled the trigger, hit eyebrow follows the CB and went up. You can argue if he is really looking at the CB. But if he is looking at the OB, his eyebrow need to get up.
I see things differently from you. It sure looks to me like on the first shot of his break his eyebrows do not move from striking to ball being potted, which means he is looking up-table during his final forward stroke. On all the other shots where I feel I have a reasonable view of his eyes, I do not see what you claim.
 
Scott Lee said:
True enough, and I do NOW, for most shots. I teach students to look at the OB because of the data available that supports that hypothesis. [...]

Here's yet another rationale for object ball last over cue ball last.

You're in position, you've aimed, you've taken a few practice strokes, and all systems are go. The only thing left is to stroke straight. And that's what all of this is about. Whether you focus on the OB or the CB isn't really about the OB or the CB, it's about stroking straight.

Here's an analogy. Let's say you're a baseball pitcher who can fairly consistently throw a ball and hit a 12-inch wide target that is 60 feet away. This target is equivalent to a 6-inch wide target that is 30 feet away, and it's equivalent to a 2-inch wide target that is 10 feet away. Now put a hole in a wall that is 10 feet away from you that can fit a baseball with 1 inch of play all the way around. Now, are you--the good pitcher--consistently going to be able to throw the baseball cleanly through the opening? Sounds to me harder than hitting the glove 60 feet away. It is easier to aim at the further away object.

With this in mind, I've been experimenting with something lately that takes the CB/OB focus thing one step further. Imagine a long tough shot with CB on the head rail and OB in the middle of the table. Instead of focusing on the OB, I actually look past the OB to a point on the far rail (or even on the next table or out the window down the street) where my aim takes me. I really think this has been helping me to pocket these balls. It could be working for me for a number of possible reasons, including (1) the baseball pitcher effect, or (2) I have no tendency to want to "steer" the fire extinguisher, or (3) I've distracted myself sufficiently that I actually stay down, or (4) I and I alone have some unusual stroke problem that happens to be helped by this.
 
mikepage said:
... Imagine a long tough shot with CB on the head rail and OB in the middle of the table. Instead of focusing on the OB, I actually look past the OB to a point on the far rail (or even on the next table or out the window down the street) where my aim takes me. ... .
This technique can also be used for a long shot when the cue ball is close to the object ball and the shot is nearly straight in. Instead of aiming at the object ball, you can shoot towards a point in or near the pocket -- a distant target.
 
Bob Jewett said:
I see things differently from you. It sure looks to me like on the first shot of his break his eyebrows do not move from striking to ball being potted, which means he is looking up-table during his final forward stroke. On all the other shots where I feel I have a reasonable view of his eyes, I do not see what you claim.
Seconded. At 1:10 where you can see his eyes he is not looking at the cue ball.

I know of no professional snooker player who advocates looking at the cue ball at impact as Wesley claims. Nor of any decent local players. I may be wrong, but I doubt it. Frank Callan disagrees with him too Yes I do
Frank Callan
Every decent player knows this, but not every decent player does it. Never forget: eyes on the object ball when striking the cue ball!
This can be:-
1 - Before you begin your backswing,
2 - After you complete your backswing,
3 - As you complete your stoke.
In all instances the eyes are on the target at impact.

If you can't hit the cue ball at the exact point you set up to hit it without looking at it then the problem isn't with your eyes.

Boro Nut
 
Last edited:
one thing that gets me about this subject is people keep making analogies to other sports like darts etc. Pool is different though. there are two elements. where you send the cue ball, and where on the cue ball the cue contacts. i find that when i need to be very accurate about where on the cb i am striking, it's better to look at the object ball last. so i can hit exactly where i want. as long as i've lined up properly and am aiming in the right place, as has already been mentioned, it shouldnt matter where your eyes are looking. your eyes arent taking the shot.
 
Bulls eye pistol shooting

Scott Lee said:
You don't...unless you have a poor stroke, or have not chalked your tip properly. I will agree that using extreme english must be done with care. You are using absolutes. One doesn't look EXCLUSIVELY at the OB. There is controlled eye pattern movement between the CB and OB. I'm just talking about where you look LAST before delivering the cuestick through the CB.

Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com

In bulls eye pistol shooting, having established the sight alignment, the front sight picture is slightly blurred as you focus on the target as you pull the trigger.

Would the Cue & CB be the sight alignment & the OB the target?

The eye can not focus short distance & long distance simultaneously.

Forget about point shooting in close combat.
 
berlowmj said:
The eye can not focus short distance & long distance simultaneously.

Shooting guns and shooting pool have nothing in common. Agreed that you cannot focus short and long at the same time. That's why you focus on each target (CB & OB) separately for a period of time (2 seconds). This allows the brain to receive the visual information from the eyes, process it, and provide some kind of feedback (go or don't go, for example).

Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
 
look when

I've found what works best for me is
2 practice strokes looking at the cb, ~2 sec.
set, visualize cb path from prior calculations
look to ob, verify cb & ob action on current aim ~2 sec.
if my comparison isn't grooving, stand up start over
if it looks right, backswing, pause, finish, freeze, smile
Thanks go out to Scott and everyone else who teaches
good pre shot routines.
Timing is key and not everyone has to do everything
the same way.
Don't take anything away from consistency either.
-cOOp
ps. don't forget to breathe
 
DrCue'sProtege said:
most will tell you that you should look at the object ball last. i dont necessarily agree with that myself. some will also tell you their preference is the cue ball.

however, it seems to me that if you are setup properly, aligned properly, aiming correctly, and stroke straight through the line then it doesnt make any difference what you are looking at. like a top level instructor told me once, "You can be looking at the blonde in the 4th row and if you do all of the above you will achieve shot success!"

DCP

Exactly. Well said. I've won tons of money at the bars lining up on the eight....and then having a short convo with my opponent asking if they want to make a side bet on a no looker eight ball shot. They get suckered in not knowing I have already took aim and with a straight stroke will pocket the ball 95% of the time.
 
I look at the ob last unless it's a shot that requires extreme precision as to placement of the tip on the cb and on these shots I'll look at the cb last. I include break shots, masse, jump, sometimes off the rail, and when I need table length draw in this catagory.

I can't prove it but I believe that I'm more accurate when I look at the ob last.
 
a9ballbr8k said:
Exactly. Well said. I've won tons of money at the bars lining up on the eight....and then having a short convo with my opponent asking if they want to make a side bet on a no looker eight ball shot. They get suckered in not knowing I have already took aim and with a straight stroke will pocket the ball 95% of the time.

You can make a lot of money against me shooting every shot that way.
 
PoolBum said:
I am curious, why do you think Earl looks at the cueball last?

Every player whom I have ever watched the first thing I look for is what their eyes are doing.

Watch Earl on TV or tapes or whatever. You will see. It is very obvious.

Allison Fisher is sort of a modified 'looking at the cueball last'. One of my best friends took a lesson from her and just before she shoots, her eyes are clued to the cueball. Then as she draws the cue back on her final stroke, her eyes shift up to the object ball.

I also forgot to mention that Keith McCready looks at the cueball last. Noticed on tapes/TV/ and in person at various pool halls in the DC area.
 
whitewolf said:
Allison Fisher is sort of a modified 'looking at the cueball last'. One of my best friends took a lesson from her and just before she shoots, her eyes are clued to the cueball. Then as she draws the cue back on her final stroke, her eyes shift up to the object ball.

.

So I guess with that long pause she has at the back of her back stroke, her eyes are fucused on the object ball for a couple of seconds before she actually shoots.....which is exactly what Scott was saying...look at the object ball last.
Steve
 
Back
Top