Which game is easier on a BB? Decider stats

9 ball is easier on a bar box than 8 ball

10 ball is 2nd easiest

Then 8 ball. 8 ball is harder due the congestion.

I sure disagree with you that 10 ball is easier than 8 ball on a barbox. I think the stats pretty well show which is easier for top players. I was a little surprised to see that their stats playing 9 and 10 ball was very close for both players. I think when Dennis and Shane played their tar match on the big table, playing 10 ball and 8 ball, they also made more run outs playing 8 ball. One could practice playing them all playing the ghost and he would find out after a while which is tougher for him. When it comes to good players, the one who breaks the best is going to determine the winner.
 
8-ball= very easy for 'B' and above players, but must have good break and make a ball or two.

9-ball=easy "B" players and above if they a have good break.

10-ball=the hardest of the three because of need to make a ball, have shot on the lowest ball, and more balls blocking CB paths up and down table. Johnnyt

I agree with this order, especially about the break.
 
I remember watching Dennis Orcullo play a 9-ball match on a BB. It was rack-your-own with a MagicRack; he racked the balls the same way every time, soft-broke and had the exact same layout after the break...every time. He BnR seven racks in row. It was possibly the most boring one hour of pool I've ever seen.

I believe some top players could run over 20 racks using the magic rack and pattern racking on a barbox.
 
As far as separating the men from the boys.... I've seen a lot of the pros get beat by younger generation "boys" on bar boxes that couldn't even begin to beat the pros on a big table.

It is easier for the pros on a big table but the difference between the two groups are minimal on a bar box.
 
I believe some top players could run over 20 racks using the magic rack and pattern racking on a barbox.

I don't disagree but I notice a lot of people (like the guy you quoted) overstating how
"every runout looks the same".

Dennis never had the same runout twice. I did a lil visual showing how frequently
each numbered ball went into the same pocket - http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=326246

I think luck is the major holdup. Even with the magic rack, there will always be funny things
that happen on the break, tiny inconsistencies that result in a different layout
than last time. At some point a ball will freeze onto the CB or line up funny and make life difficult.

What I always felt was kind of amazing is... I'm not sure if we have a true ten pack on video,
we have part of earl's 11 rack run on video but it features early 9's. We have a 9-pack on youtube.

It seems to me if MBR+pattern rack were so dead nuts easy, some pro or shortstop
would go ahead and lay down a 10 pack on video, just to say he was the first to ever get one on film.


And if we combine the breaker's 24 of 31 run outs after successful breaks and the non-breaker's
18 of 21 run outs after unsuccessful breaks, we have the result that the player who had the first shot after the break
ran out from there 42 times in 52 games, or 81%!!!!

Pretty easy game, eh?

I knew I could count on you... yup, it does seem a little too easy. I think the difficulty of congestion
is overstated a little by barbox fans. Or maybe congestion drastically tanks runout rates for the average player,
but doesn't faze the top pros much.

It may be they're right about 8 ball at the pro level, do you know how often we see 10b get run out by the incoming player?
I bet after factoring rack'n'runs, 10b is still 20-30% lower runout rate typically.
 
8 ball is much easier for pros down to strong "B" players than rotation games. You miss position a little and you could have 5 or 6 more balls for a shot. In rotation you miss position you're SOL. Breaking balls up is so much more easy in 8 ball. You have many balls to play the breakup from and you can take many patterns to get to the breakout. Anyone that says 8 ball is harder than rotation on a Bar Box most likely hasn't played a lot of both on a BB IMO. Johnnyt
 
... It may be they're right about 8 ball at the pro level, do you know how often we see 10b get run out by the incoming player?
I bet after factoring rack'n'runs, 10b is still 20-30% lower runout rate typically.

I looked at the Pool-Trax information for both the 9-Ball and 10-Ball sets of the Shane/Earl bar-box match. It appears that the post-break run-out percentage for both sets was about 40% for the breaker and 50% for the non-breaker (44% combined) -- much lower than for the 8-Ball session..

[Incidentally, because of rack-your-own matches, the rack'n'run terminology doesn't really work.]
 
8 ball is much easier for pros down to strong "B" players than rotation games. You miss position a little and you could have 5 or 6 more balls for a shot. In rotation you miss position you're SOL. Breaking balls up is so much more easy in 8 ball. You have many balls to play the breakup from and you can take many patterns to get to the breakout. Anyone that says 8 ball is harder than rotation on a Bar Box most likely hasn't played a lot of both on a BB IMO. Johnnyt

What you say makes sense on paper, but I don't believe it works out like that. Just ask around to a bunch of B players and above that play both games fairly regularly, and ask them what their high runs in each are. I know that mine in 9 ball is twice that of 8 ball. And I have bested my high runs in 8 ball many times playing 9 ball.

And, just so you know, I have won three decent amateur tournaments (twice won the area title) playing 8 ball, so I do know how to play it.
 
What you say makes sense on paper, but I don't believe it works out like that. Just ask around to a bunch of B players and above that play both games fairly regularly, and ask them what their high runs in each are. I know that mine in 9 ball is twice that of 8 ball. And I have bested my high runs in 8 ball many times playing 9 ball.

And, just so you know, I have won three decent amateur tournaments (twice won the area title) playing 8 ball, so I do know how to play it.

Well... Neil, I trust your opinion. On the highest level pros, ex SVB... How might you explain why the largest package between 8, 9 & 10 ball this last weekend, by FAR, was 8 ball? It wasn't even close on a BB. I know it's a small sample size.

I don't play much 8 ball. Don't play on BB, just 9's. This is an interesting conversation.
 
Well... Neil, I trust your opinion. On the highest level pros, ex SVB... How might you explain why the largest package between 8, 9 & 10 ball this last weekend, by FAR, was 8 ball? It wasn't even close on a BB. I know it's a small sample size.

I don't play much 8 ball. Don't play on BB, just 9's. This is an interesting conversation.

I don't think anyone, even Shane and Earl, can explain why they played 50 games and only ran a couple of two packs between them! It's not at all uncommon for A players to put at least a 5 pack on someone in an evenings play playing 9 ball on a bar box.

The 8 pack Shane did in 8 ball was the highest I have ever seen. Although I have heard of higher.

Let's phrase a question a little bit differently for fun....two guys playing 9 ball, rack your own, barbox, play 50 games. Highest for either was just a two pack.... what would you rate them at just by that?? B- or B? Yet, somehow, two of the best players in the world managed to do just that! Perfect storm in reverse???
 
I don't think anyone, even Shane and Earl, can explain why they played 50 games and only ran a couple of two packs between them! It's not at all uncommon for A players to put at least a 5 pack on someone in an evenings play playing 9 ball on a bar box.

The 8 pack Shane did in 8 ball was the highest I have ever seen. Although I have heard of higher.

Let's phrase a question a little bit differently for fun....two guys playing 9 ball, rack your own, barbox, play 50 games. Highest for either was just a two pack.... what would you rate them at just by that?? B- or B? Yet, somehow, two of the best players in the world managed to do just that! Perfect storm in reverse???

Shane has run a 15 pack on a BB. Did I see it.no. But he said it on a TAR podcast and I believe him. Johnnyt
 
What you say makes sense on paper, but I don't believe it works out like that. Just ask around to a bunch of B players and above that play both games fairly regularly, and ask them what their high runs in each are. I know that mine in 9 ball is twice that of 8 ball. And I have bested my high runs in 8 ball many times playing 9 ball.

And, just so you know, I have won three decent amateur tournaments (twice won the area title) playing 8 ball, so I do know how to play it.

How much more 9 ball have you played compared to 8 ball though? I know I have played 100 times or more 9 ball than 8 ball so, naturally I have more runs in 9 ball. I have played in two 8 ball tournaments lately on sat, and noticed players running out much more playing 8 ball than they do in the 9 balls fri tournament, with the same players every week.
 
Shane has run a 15 pack on a BB. Did I see it.no. But he said it on a TAR podcast and I believe him. Johnnyt

I can't explain it either JohnnyT or Neil. This weekend's stats were so askew, it was mind boggling.This is why we pay AtLarge so much money. ;)
 
Not to mention Jack Hines ran a 48 pack with 17 iguanas on his shoulders with a house cue.

(this is all too difficult)
 
I don't disagree but I notice a lot of people (like the guy you quoted) overstating how
"every runout looks the same".

Dennis never had the same runout twice. I did a lil visual showing how frequently
each numbered ball went into the same pocket - http://forums.azbilliards.com/showthread.php?t=326246

I think luck is the major holdup. Even with the magic rack, there will always be funny things
that happen on the break, tiny inconsistencies that result in a different layout
than last time. At some point a ball will freeze onto the CB or line up funny and make life difficult.

What I always felt was kind of amazing is... I'm not sure if we have a true ten pack on video,
we have part of earl's 11 rack run on video but it features early 9's. We have a 9-pack on youtube.

It seems to me if MBR+pattern rack were so dead nuts easy, some pro or shortstop
would go ahead and lay down a 10 pack on video, just to say he was the first to ever get one on film.




I knew I could count on you... yup, it does seem a little too easy. I think the difficulty of congestion
is overstated a little by barbox fans. Or maybe congestion drastically tanks runout rates for the average player,
but doesn't faze the top pros much.

It may be they're right about 8 ball at the pro level, do you know how often we see 10b get run out by the incoming player?
I bet after factoring rack'n'runs, 10b is still 20-30% lower runout rate typically.

I along with plenty of others there, have already seen a 11 pack run using a magic rack in a gamble match from a shortstop.
 
Shane has run a 15 pack on a BB. Did I see it.no. But he said it on a TAR podcast and I believe him. Johnnyt

I'm sure he has, Johnny, not saying at all that he hasn't. I just stated that the 8 pack was the largest I have personally seen. Souquet did a 27 pack on a 9'er.

At that level, running out once you have a shot is basically a given for either 8 or 9 ball. That they both broke so poorly in 9 ball was the most amazing part of that match.

Heck, in 9 ball barbox, in a race to 7 tournaments, I fully expect to do a three pack each set. And I'm a nobody. If I don't, I know something is off. For them not to do that in a race to 30 is almost unbelievable!
 
How much more 9 ball have you played compared to 8 ball though? I know I have played 100 times or more 9 ball than 8 ball so, naturally I have more runs in 9 ball. I have played in two 8 ball tournaments lately on sat, and noticed players running out much more playing 8 ball than they do in the 9 balls fri tournament, with the same players every week.

The last ten years or so it's been mostly 9 ball. Before that, it was about 60-40 eight ball. For years most of my play was in bars, where it's almost always 8 ball. Then it went to the pool rooms with 9 ball on the 9'ers in the early evening, and the bars with 8 ball at night on the barboxes. Now it's 99% just on my own barbox when I'm up to it.

As to the guys you have seen in the tournaments, I see the same thing in leagues here from people. They predominantly play 8 ball, and are comfortable with it, plus, it's slop counts. Watch the same people play 9 ball, and they can't get out from anywhere on an open rack! They have it in their head that they don't know how to play 9 ball, and keep missing shots they would never miss playing 8 ball.

Once they get it in their head that it is still just making balls and getting position on the next ball, they do a lot better in 9 ball.
 
I'm sure he has, Johnny, not saying at all that he hasn't. I just stated that the 8 pack was the largest I have personally seen. Souquet did a 27 pack on a 9'er.

Christ, when was this? I'd heard of matlock doing over 20 before but took it with a grain of salt.
Was there a post on this 27 pack? I dunno how I missed this. Any witnesses?
8 ball I assume? Ghost or just break'n'run normally?
 
I don't think anyone, even Shane and Earl, can explain why they played 50 games and only ran a couple of two packs between them! It's not at all uncommon for A players to put at least a 5 pack on someone in an evenings play playing 9 ball on a bar box.

The 8 pack Shane did in 8 ball was the highest I have ever seen. Although I have heard of higher.

Let's phrase a question a little bit differently for fun....two guys playing 9 ball, rack your own, barbox, play 50 games. Highest for either was just a two pack.... what would you rate them at just by that?? B- or B? Yet, somehow, two of the best players in the world managed to do just that! Perfect storm in reverse???

Good point, Neil. I think it may have been just an aberration. From what little I have seen of pros on a bar box, it would not have surprised me at all if they had produced some large packages in 9-Ball and/or 10-Ball.

I wouldn't generalize too much from the results of this match.
 
Last edited:
Christ, when was this? I'd heard of matlock doing over 20 before but took it with a grain of salt.
Was there a post on this 27 pack? I dunno how I missed this. Any witnesses?
8 ball I assume? Ghost or just break'n'run normally?

It's been posted on here in the past. Try a search for "highest runs" and you might find it in there somewhere. Might even be shorter to search his name.??

Oh, he did it a number of years ago. Not sure just how long ago though.
 
Back
Top