This is where we disagree. It wouldn't feel any more "refreshing" or "honorable" if I included my last name on my posts. Even if it does make me feel a bit better, would that added satisfaction outweigh the increased likelihood of the invasion of my privacy? Not for me. I have a wife, a kid, and another on the way. Their privacy and protection mean infinitely more to me than any satisfaction I could ever have on any internet forum.mikepage said:As to what do you benefit? Well that's kind of subjective. Maybe it doesn't matter at all to you. But I find it kind of refreshing and even honorable that I stand behind what I say, that I'm accountable for what I've said in the past, that I say what I mean and mean what I say, that you know who you're talking to.
It's no insult to me that you mistook me for someone as smart as Jal. Though, maybe Jal might take offense to that.mikepage said:I know your name is Joe, which brings up another point. I know your name is Joe because you once corrected me when I called you Jim. Apparently all I internalized when I read your initials was the guy who uses three initials that starts with j. You're jsp. There's another poster , jal, whose name is Jim. When I called you Jim, it was because I confused you with jal. So for a long time all your opinions and views I interpreted in the context of someone who had posted all of jal's stuff. It painted an incorrect picture of you.

BTW, do I question the intelligence of Jal's technical posts any more so because he hasn't revealed his last name? Nope.
No...at least not to me.mikepage said:...(2) A poster will develop into a respected voice faster if he has a name/identity that are easy to remember.
I remember when I first started posting on this forum over two years ago, the one poster that stood out from the rest was sjm, arguably the most repected poster on this forum, and also a poster who prefers to remain anonymous. I took what sjm posted at face value, and didn't regard his posts any more or any less because of his lack of identity. It's only recently that I finally came across sjm's real name...but it really didn't matter. He is still sjm to me, the most respected forum member.
But yes, I do agree to an extent that revealing more about yourself will give some sense of reality to your posts. Though, that doesn't mean you need to provide your last name. Your first name, location, and age are more than sufficient information needed to give fellow posters a certain sense of the type of person you are. If you want, you can even include your occupation in your profile. Any of those four bits of information would be much more valuable to me as forum member than your last name.
Even more valuable would be a picture of yourself, if you want to go to that extent. I thought the "Faces for the names" thread that Mr. Wilson started was an excellent idea. Of course, no one should be forced to provide a picture, but to me it's still more valuable than a last name. BTW, if you haven't seen it, I have posted a picture of myself in that thread a long time ago...if you want to take the time to look for it (I don't).
To me, you're mikepage. You could have posted as mikep or mp...it wouldn't have mattered to me. BTW, how do I know Mike Page is your real name anyway? A name is just a name. From your posts, and your posts alone, I already have a pretty good understanding of the type of person you are, and it's not pretty. (Just kidding

jsp <~~ Joe, 28, Raleigh-area, analog IC designer, father of two, D+ player (fastly approaching C- status)
Last edited: