Why CTE is silly

Status
Not open for further replies.
Robert

Your last question is one I have had for quite a while. I personally asked Hal about this and he did not have a solution. So if you've read claims of this from Hal I'd say not unless he's come up with something recently.

Here's a claim from the 1997 post by Hal that PJ quoted above:
3 angles for all shots, on any size pool table, including snooker & bar
tables. Includes; pocketing, caroms, single rail banks, double rail
banks, 2, 3, and 4 rail banks, and double kiss banks.

Robert
 
This is also known as Hal's 3-angle system. It is a type of fractional-ball aiming. The value and limitations of these types of approaches are described here:

FYI, here's the complete quote from Hal on this topic:
Hal Houle said:
There are only 3 angles for any shot, on any size table. This includes; caroms, single rail banks, double rail banks, 1, 2, 3, and 4 rail banks, and double kiss banks. Any table has a 2 to 1 ratio; 3 1/2 x 7, 4 x 8, 4 x 9, 5 x 10, 6 x 12. It is always twice as long as it is wide. The table corners are 90 degree angles. When you lay a cue from the side pocket to the corner pocket, you are forming an angle of 45 degrees. When you lay a cue from the side pocket to the middle diamond on the same end rail, you are forming an angle of 30 degrees. When you lay a cue from the side pocket to the first diamond on the same end rail, you are forming an angle of 15 degrees. When you add up these 3 angles, they total 90 degrees, which is the same angle formed by the table corners. The cue ball relation to object ball relation shot angle is always 15, 30, or 45 degrees. The solution is very simple. There are only 2 edges on the cue ball to aim with, and they are always exactly in the same place on the cue ball. There are only 3 exact spots on the object ball to aim to, and they are always exactly in the same place on the object ball. So, 2 edges on the cue ball, and 3 spots on the object ball; 2 x 3 = 6 which is the total number of table pockets. This means that, depending upon how the cue ball and object ball lie in relation to one another, you may either pocket the object ball directly into a pocket or bank it into any one of the remaining 5 pockets. Of course, the reverse is true. If the relationship of cue ball to object ball can only be a bank, so be it. There is never a need to look at a pocket or cushion while lining up the edge on the cue ball to the spot on the object ball. You have only those 3 angles Your only requirement is to recognize whether your shot is a 15, 30, or 45 degree angle. Recognizing those 3 angles can be accomplished in an instant by aiming the edge of the cue ball to one of the spots on the object ball. It will be obvious which object ball spot is correct. There will be no doubt. Any time either one of the 2 edges on the cue ball is aimed at any one of the 3 spots on the object ball, that object ball must go to a pocket. Choose the correct spot and the object ball will most certainly go to the chosen pocket. The top professional players in the game have always known about this professional aiming system, but they are a closed fraternity, and you are the enemy. Interested in where those spots are located?

The 2 places on the cue ball are the left edge of the cue ball when you are cutting the object ball to the left; and the right edge of the cue ball when you are cutting the object ball to the right. The 3 spots on the object ball are the quarters, and the center. The quarters and center of the object ball face straight at the edges of your cue ball, not facing toward the pocket. In other words, if you were on a work-bench at home, there would be no pocket, so you would just line up the edge of the cue ball straight to your target on the object ball. When you cut to the left for 15 degrees, aim the left cue ball edge at the object ball left quarter. When you cut to the left for 30 degrees, aim the cue ball left edge at the object ball center. When you cut to the left for 45 degrees, aim the cue ball left edge at the object ball right quarter. When you cut to the right for 15 degrees, you aim the cue ball right edge at the object ball right quarter. When you cut to the right for 30 degrees, you aim the cue ball right edge at the object center. When you cut to the right for 45 degrees, you aim the right cue ball edge to the object ball left quarter. If you'll just get down and aim your old way, you'll be close to where you should be aiming. Look to see (without changing your head or eye position) just where the cue ball edge is aiming at the object ball. You'll see that on every shot that the cue ball edge is always aiming at the same targets on the object ball. Remember, this system is for any shot on the table; banks, caroms, combinations, and so forth. The only shot remaining is the extreme cut for any shot over 45 degrees. Aim the cue ball edge to the eighth of the object ball (which is half of the quarter). Don't let the pocket influence you. Have a friend hold the ball tray between the object ball and the pocket, so you cannot see the pocket, and you'll see that those 3 angles will handle just about anything. Of course, you would have chosen the 15, 30, or 45 degree angle before your friend put the ball tray in place. It also makes it much more interesting if you don't tell your friend how you are pocketing the ball without seeing the pocket. Have some fun. For any questions, call me. Regards, POOL HAL.
Regards,
Dave
 
Should be interesting.

"....This explanation of the system that later became known as CTE only left readers scratching their heads; just as did the quoted comments Houle made in the AZBilliards forums in 2007 and 2008. But what these things did do, however, was to stir enough interest in a few readers to prompt them to take Houle up on his offer of free instruction by phone. A couple of curious readers even made the trek to Houle's home to get free personal instruction.

And what those personal calls and visits eventually led to was a few converts who now claim that there really is something to this CTE thing after all. And these few were now more than willing to defend it whenever its forum critics expressed their continued disbelief. Their biggest problem, however, was that they still couldn't (or maybe just wouldn't) explain exactly how it works.

In the next (and last) installment in this series, I am going to reveal what CTE really is, and explain why it has been so hotly debated. "

http://www.azbilliards.com/rogerlong/roger5.php
 
In the next (and last) installment in this series, I am going to reveal what CTE really is, and explain why it has been so hotly debated. "

http://www.azbilliards.com/rogerlong/roger5.php
I sure hope Roger's third article actually lives up to the promise. The first two articles were interesting, but the suspense/hype is a bit over the top, IMO. I also hope the long-awaited DVD and/or book from Stan and/or Spidey also come out soon. Until we have an authoritative reference on CTE and/or Pro-One, the hype and skepticism that has continued for many years will continue on indefinitely.

Still waiting patiently,
Dave
 
"....This explanation of the system that later became known as CTE only left readers scratching their heads; just as did the quoted comments Houle made in the AZBilliards forums in 2007 and 2008. But what these things did do, however, was to stir enough interest in a few readers to prompt them to take Houle up on his offer of free instruction by phone. A couple of curious readers even made the trek to Houle's home to get free personal instruction.

And what those personal calls and visits eventually led to was a few converts who now claim that there really is something to this CTE thing after all. And these few were now more than willing to defend it whenever its forum critics expressed their continued disbelief. Their biggest problem, however, was that they still couldn't (or maybe just wouldn't) explain exactly how it works.

In the next (and last) installment in this series, I am going to reveal what CTE really is, and explain why it has been so hotly debated. "

http://www.azbilliards.com/rogerlong/roger5.php

This is a great post but I wonder, did Roger make that trek to see Hal. If he did I look forward to his article, If not what excactly are his resources. Hope he is not just winging it, after all you can't believe everything you read, can you?
 
Hal appears smart when he controls the conversation. When you get him off his script and actually probe a bit, he's... well... pretty normal...

.

Mike, I think this is quite normal for people on the genius IQ level. Not saying that Hal is on that level, just that that behavior is normal for that level.
 
I'll just speak for the first link right now...

The first link is nothing but the field manual for answering the question implied by this thread: "Why IS CTE silly?"

Who would have imagined that all those years ago Hal would write the ANSWER to my thread--which hadn't even been conceived then? Maybe Hal IS a genius...some kind of time traveler investigating cause-effect paradoxes :D
 
Last edited:
I sure hope Roger's third article actually lives up to the promise. The first two articles were interesting, but the suspense/hype is a bit over the top, IMO. I also hope the long-awaited DVD and/or book from Stan and/or Spidey also come out soon. Until we have an authoritative reference on CTE and/or Pro-One, the hype and skepticism that has continued for many years will continue on indefinitely.

Still waiting patiently,
Dave

I just received a first full version of my Basic CTE and PRO ONE DVD. I am very pleased with how it has come together. I will do a few tweaks on version 1 and then view a 2nd full version, hopefully very soon. After that the DVD will soon be available. DVD time will be about 1:30. Pricing and other information should appear on justcueit.com soon. The DVD will be priced at $39 plus S/H.
Thanks for being patient.. It has been quite a process. I have enjoyed the whole ordeal.
Stan Shuffett
 
I just received a first full version of my Basic CTE and PRO ONE DVD. I am very pleased with how it has come together. I will do a few tweaks on version 1 and then view a 2nd full version, hopefully very soon. After that the DVD will soon be available. DVD time will be about 1:30. Pricing and other information should appear on justcueit.com soon. The DVD will be priced at $39 plus S/H.
Thanks for being patient.. It has been quite a process. I have enjoyed the whole ordeal.
Stan Shuffett

Hope your DVD does well with sales!
 
I just received a first full version of my Basic CTE and PRO ONE DVD. I am very pleased with how it has come together. I will do a few tweaks on version 1 and then view a 2nd full version, hopefully very soon. After that the DVD will soon be available. DVD time will be about 1:30. Pricing and other information should appear on justcueit.com soon. The DVD will be priced at $39 plus S/H.
Thanks for being patient.. It has been quite a process. I have enjoyed the whole ordeal.
Stan Shuffett
Thanks for the update Stan. I look forward to seeing it.

I hope sales go well,
Dave
 
mikepage:
he's... well... pretty normal...
cookie man:
Mike, I think this is quite normal for people on the genius IQ level. Not saying that Hal is on that level, just that that behavior is normal for that level.
So you're saying that, for geniuses and Hal at least, being "pretty normal" is pretty normal?

That would certainly set them apart from the rest of us.

pj
chgo
 
Look, I know this is politically incorrect around here. But Hal Houle is not some kind of aiming guru or something. He's a nice guy who liked to collect little aiming "systems" and dole them out to folks in teaser increments.

Again, he's a nice guy and he knows a lot of stuff. But there are several people on this forum alone who could give him the seven ball when it comes to actually understanding principles of aiming.

Hal appears smart when he controls the conversation. When you get him off his script and actually probe a bit, he's... well... pretty normal...

It irritates me to see people pumping up the LEGEND OF HAL and then painting themselves as one of the few conduits to this nearly lost fountain of knowledge and wisdom. Give us a break for crying out loud.

Might you find some interesting things from him? Yes.

Is he some sort of brilliant sage who holds the keys to the kingdom of pool knowledge? Hardly.

The romance is fun, but wake up people and splash some water on your faces...

He only went on the road with arguably one of the best players of all time. He's prob the last living guy who hung with Greenleaf at that level. Think he didn't get knowledge? He only has a few interesting things? I've learned so much from Hal over the 10 or so times we've spent time together. You're either not paying attention or never spent real time with him.
 
He only went on the road with arguably one of the best players of all time. He's prob the last living guy who hung with Greenleaf at that level. Think he didn't get knowledge? He only has a few interesting things? I've learned so much from Hal over the 10 or so times we've spent time together. You're either not paying attention or never spent real time with him.


I have to agree with Mike.

In my conversation with Hal, he initially launched into his spiel about his aiming system. I let him go, but after about 10 minutes I started asking questions. It didn't go so well for Hal. He sputtered and had to back pedal on several assertions he had made.

Don't get me wrong. Hal is a very, very nice guy. And perhaps traveling with Greenleaf he did picked up a couple of things when Greenleaf wasn't in the bag (which, by most accounts, wouldn't have been very often). But great insights? Doubtful.

Maybe it's because I've been around the game longer than you and did catch the tail end of the post Hustler era, but I recall going to places like The Palace and Cochran's in San Francisco late at night and playing and watching many of the old-timers. For a couple of bucks a game you couple play almost any of them there, sitting on the rail, and they would regale you with countless systems, and tips about the game. It's where I first "learned" a number of them, like the ferrule system, the light system, the ghost table, and the spot on the wall. Old time pool rooms were filled with guys that had all kinds of arcane knowledge. And a few of the things they knew were actually right. But, much of it, nowadays, has been proven to be wrong -- even little rules-of-thumb that Mosconi -- arguably the greatest player of all time -- taught in his books.

Hal is a great old-timer. Just think of the stories he could have shared with all of us about the golden era of pool, if he had chosen to do so. Instead, we got half-baked ideas about aiming systems.

Lou Figueroa
 
Last edited:
Here's a claim from the 1997 post by Hal that PJ quoted above:


Robert
Maybe I misinturpreted your question. My question was use of the system for controling the OB for Position Play. Caroms is another topic but an interesting one. I've not seen any discussion on CB control with this system and is one of my problems with it. Lack of knowledge. All discussions call out Center Ball. Speed control is all I can think of to control the CB using CTE and Center Ball??????
 
^ Nicely put, Lou.

Discernment is always the steady guide forward.

From what little I've read of what Hal has come up with (who has had much more experience around pool than I've had, but much LESS experience around the challenges of thinking and analysis): It seems like he's someone who loves to THINK about pool aiming, but whose thinking hasn't turned out to have been meaningfully productive.

Some guys in his position just get LOST in their ideas--when they're not progressing as they would like.

That's just the way things can go when wrestling with new ideas.
 
CTE is not silly. How can you guys be so callous. Seriously, there's nothing wrong with fighting against poverty. Have a heart...


http://www.ctecap.org/
Google, google, google.....

Are you sure they're not talking about "Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy?" Which I suppose comes from repeatedly banging your head against the wall and describes some of these threads pretty well. CTE causes CTE.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top