Or, "breaker sits down". Seems reasonable to me.Why not just rule that the inning is over after the break no matter what happens?
pj
chgo
Or, "breaker sits down". Seems reasonable to me.Why not just rule that the inning is over after the break no matter what happens?
pj
chgo
Ok but something is tilted. The table the rack the camera my screen or my eyes. And rodney made him rerack once. Something was tilted both times. I think. But that’s why i posted this.
I think the BCAPL eight ball break rule would work more fairly.
I would prefer that the breaker have the option to spot the made ball up and relinquish the table as is.The option would give him a slight reward for making a ball in his pocket.
Why not just rule that the inning is over after the break no matter what happens?
pj
chgo
Or, "breaker sits down". Seems reasonable to me.
Not sure how having to spot the ball is any kind of a reward.
It might end up being bankable or create a dead combo to his opponent's pocket.
Lou Figueroa
The key word is option.
Go to 1:23:30
https://youtu.be/WTgopqgEXx4
Hard to be real sure but it does appear to be a line on the table. If it's actually a racking line then it does appear to be a tilted rack. Again really hard to tell.
lol, if you advertise that you think you can do that, like CD, and use a blast them open 8ball break playing 1pocket, for money, I have no doubt you will immediately have tons of action available.
Interestingly, not even CD uses that break playing 1pocket.
Lou Figueroa
just sayin'
Why would a player give up the table?
Lou Figueroa
If I make a beautiful break with the balls favorable to me and accidentally pocket a ball, it is not to my advantage to rerack and do it again. The second break could leave a less advantageous lay out.
Either way the breaker is giving up the table. The option to just spot the pocketed ball or rerack and break again is dependent on the rules not allowing a ball made on the break.
The line is for spotting balls. Middle ball on bottom rail should be on that line.
OK.
But as I've said, we already have a solution that, over the years has seen relatively wide adoption by players. Why muddle things up with another rule change?
Lou Figueroa
Only if it was an improvement. Rule changes come about to improve the game. Some changes are more widely applauded than others. I would wager that all have ruffled feathers.:shrug:
And you can use that line to align the rack when racking also. Where I used to play a lot of one pocket, each table had a rack with a line drawn on the center of the "back" of the rack. You simply line that up with the line on the cloth. Voila, consistently lined up racks...
And you can use that line to align the rack when racking also. Where I used to play a lot of one pocket, each table had a rack with a line drawn on the center of the "back" of the rack. You simply line that up with the line on the cloth. Voila, consistently lined up racks...