Marco, and Chris, respectively:
I 100% agree on both accounts. Like you said in your blog, Marco, the US Team consisted of a "hodge podge" (although you didn't use those words) of a motley crew of individuals, not core components of a team. If it's true that the U.S. Team didn't practice together and have breakfast together, as you noticed, Marco, then to me it's a glaring indicator that the U.S. Team wasn't prepared to go into the Mosconi Cup in the first place. Especially despicable would be if the players instead were out on their own each night, looking for "action," instead of practicing and strategizing for the subsequent day's competition.
Add to this that you had three journeymen (JA, Rodney, Shane), but two players that were noticeably weaker. Team Europe, on the other hand, consisted of all strong players that earned their spot on the team -- most of whom are journeyman (with the exception of Chris Melling, since this was his first event).
I also agree that the U.S. players need to get back to basics -- strengthening their fundamentals. Way too many errors were made on basic shots, and although the pressure of the Mosconi Cup is tremendous, the player has to have reliable fundamentals to play through that pressure. Even though I'm a big advocate of snooker fundamentals myself, I don't necessarily agree with TheThaiger that the U.S. players need to switch to snooker fundamentals. When you look at the world-class Chinese and European players (and including most members of Team Europe itself), all of them -- with few exceptions -- utilize the Lance Perkins pool fundamentals to a significant degree.
Finally, it is the team captain's job to instill a sense of teamsmanship among his players. It is the captain's responsibility to ensure that the players all do things together during the preparatory period before the Mosconi Cup, as well as during the event itself (in after-hours times). The U.S. Team FAILED in that endeavor. No slight to Charlie Williams himself (as a person), as I'm sure he did the best with the experience he has, but he was a poor choice for team captain. Among all the extremely-experienced pool stewards we have in the USA (e.g. Allen Hopkins, Mike Massey, Nick Varner, Kim Davenport, ...the list goes on), Charlie was chosen? It's been mentioned on these boards before, that one factor -- above all others -- played the crucial role in his selection, and that was cronyism. Although Charlie's contributions to pool are significant (e.g. Dragon Promotions, the reawakening of 14.1 as a competitive event, etc.), he's still an active player, not "sage" enough experience-wise, and at the time, unproven in his coaching abilities for a team. Again, no offense to Charlie, but he simply does not have the PRESENCE that, say, an Allen Hopkins or a Mike Massey has. Whether he likes it or not, though, a good chunk of the responsibility for the team's performance goes to the captain, and in this regard, he didn't live up to expectations.
I'm personally hoping that some significant lessons were learned this time, for next year's event. I'm hoping that 2012 will prove to be much, much better.
-Sean