I think Sigel isn't the underdog to anyone on the team in an all-around that included 14.1.
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
Johnny Archer, who ran 174 in competition in 2010, is a better 14.1 player than Sigel and Dennis Hatch is comparable in 14.1 to Sigel. In fact, there isn't any game on a pool table that Sigel plays better than these two.
An all around between Mike and Shane Van Boening would be comical, whether or not 14.1 was included. Shane would crush Mike in any other discipline and would have an outside chance in 14.1.
Mike, whose place in pool history as one of the greatest ever is undeniable, has done nothing in recent years that would lead anyone to believe that he should be counted among the elite. Maybe you've seen something that the rest of us missed. If so, what was it?