1. So, is this an organized boycott by members of the BMPAP or are each of the players boycotting on their own? Is a player boycotting because their manager is a part of the BMPAP, or because they honestly don't think that the BSCP is above board? Do the players really honestly care about how Alex was treated at the Guinness Tour and whether 5% of the money from last year came from the government? In the states, players are struggling just to pay for their rent from month to month. If given the chance to win enough money to pay their bills for well over a year, they don't care if the money where the money came from or how another player was treated.
2. There is not enough space on this message to provide you a list of players who would pay without seeing the money in escrow. But if you look at the players who have competed in the US Open every year, as well as just about any pro event to ever take place in the states then you have a good start. I don't know of one promoter in the states who has ever shown the money in escrow.
3. I was not aware that Yen had the permit for the 06 event. I guess he did not have one for the 07 event. If he didn't feel he needed one for the 07 event, then I would assume he does not feel he needs one for the 08 event.
4. Yes, there is nothing wrong with voicing concerns with things that someone don't see as right. But all that person is doing is voicing their opinion. There is a big difference though, between stating that you don't agree with the way someone does business and actively trying to attack that person and their business.
With all of this said, please understand that these are just my opinions. I am speaking for myself and only myself. I consider Yen a business acquaintance, and I do respect what he has done in the past. From what I have read and been told about the current situation, I don't think that either side is 100% right or 100% wrong.
I do however, see the damage that is being done to pool not only in the Philippines but in the rest of the world as well.
Mike
2. There is not enough space on this message to provide you a list of players who would pay without seeing the money in escrow. But if you look at the players who have competed in the US Open every year, as well as just about any pro event to ever take place in the states then you have a good start. I don't know of one promoter in the states who has ever shown the money in escrow.
3. I was not aware that Yen had the permit for the 06 event. I guess he did not have one for the 07 event. If he didn't feel he needed one for the 07 event, then I would assume he does not feel he needs one for the 08 event.
4. Yes, there is nothing wrong with voicing concerns with things that someone don't see as right. But all that person is doing is voicing their opinion. There is a big difference though, between stating that you don't agree with the way someone does business and actively trying to attack that person and their business.
With all of this said, please understand that these are just my opinions. I am speaking for myself and only myself. I consider Yen a business acquaintance, and I do respect what he has done in the past. From what I have read and been told about the current situation, I don't think that either side is 100% right or 100% wrong.
I do however, see the damage that is being done to pool not only in the Philippines but in the rest of the world as well.
Mike
bandido said:Let me clear it up for you.
1. This is about the complaint of "conflict of interest" for ONE. Represent as BSCP and pocket as RAYA. Projects here involving government funds require a bidding before its awarded to a private entity. From what I understand, this is being looked into by the Ombudsman. Second part of this, as has been stated in this forum a number of times, is his unfair treatment of players for which he has a lawsuit against by Alex Pagulayan and more to come from othwer players because of the Ginness Qualifier issue. Lawsuits Mike so these aren't just make-believe grievances. The players want him out of BSCP because of the above among others. They, the players, make their own decision when it comes to participation in tournaments. As evidenced by their non-participation in the just concluded National Open. This eventuallity of making a decision to or not to join a tournament happens all over the world for whatever reason a particular player has. So if the top players here decided not to because of, amongst others, the reasons stated above then they have every right to that decision. BSCP being an NSA has a responsibility to the country and the participants and their loosing constituents reflect badly on them.
2. Show me a player who'll fork out his/her entry fee and not want to know where the prize money is coming from or kept.
3. Yen is fighting the law of the land and the process is on-going so until a judgement is laid down the law still applies. You can't just have the citizenry in limbo while a law is still being contested right? They haven't even pinned down what exactly he is contesting to start hearing his contention for whatever he is contesting. Personally, I still consider that a nuisance complaint. Unlike the players complaints against him, where a lawsuit has been filed on a defined complaint (libel), they're just at hearing on the term definition of the word "games" and "sport" to determine if Yen's complaint has merit. So PD 871 still applies.
There already is a precedent, too, since Yen did acquire a Promoter's license from GAB and an event permit for his 2006 WPC. What then is the problem now in acquiring these?
4. Wouldn't you voice out against a supposed leadership if there were evidences to his improprieties?
So does the above look like all the same reason? In a way they all point out to his need to get out of the NSA or BSCP. He cannot use its powers of affiliation to financially benefit his personal corporation, RAYA.