PBS Women's 9 Ball World Championship
- By sjm
- Main Forum
- 178 Replies
That would make it possible for #3 to draw #21 in the first round, so it may be right.Someone in the chat said top 16 seeded. Dunno if that’s true.
That would make it possible for #3 to draw #21 in the first round, so it may be right.Someone in the chat said top 16 seeded. Dunno if that’s true.
Noone does. Maybe the event isn't seeded at all.
Funny story about that. I rented out big bertha while I was waiting for a match in one of the big tourneys there. The swanee or a predator 10 ball event, I don't remember which, I was shooting some shots and Butch Barba comes over and says I'll shoot that shot with my eyes closed and he did, it was an object ball in the center of the table and the cueball about a diamond out, shooting it into the far corner.Haven't heard double or triple shim in a long long time. Before all the good table mechanics, shimming was the way. Also heard double and triple tough as a reference to tables.
Stupid tough only comes to mind thinking about the golf table at Hard Times.
I don't recall if I posted this in on AZ before, or in a Discord thread, but I could not find it with a quick search (and too lazy to really dig)....I understand that using top and bottom will change the path of the cue ball after hitting the object ball. But what about after it hits a rail? I think the common saying is that, without sidespin, angle in equals angle out. But does having a lot of top spin or bottom spin on the cue ball when it hits the rail affect its path after it comes off said rail?
I know that using bottom / top on kick shots will shorten or lengthen the kick but I haven't noticed that the top/bottom affects the cue ball after it hits a rail after shooting at an object ball.
Here's an example shot where if I shoot with maximum high, it seems the angle in really equals angle out without the top spin affecting the cue ball after rail contact. https://www.chalkysticks.com/diagram/CF244cY.png
So why is it so apparent on kick shots but not on shots where you hit an object ball?
ok yes, I wasn't saying that it wasn't relatively tighter, but it can be a looser throat than a tighter pocket and still reject more balls, is what I was meaning.Too wide an angle equates to a larger mouth vs throat.