WTB 10' antique Brunswick table - Kling, Arcade, Anniversary

Hi all,

I'm interested in buying a 10' antique Brunswick. I'm interested in a pool table, but don't mind if it's a snooker table. The models that I most desire are the Kling and Arcade. I also like the Regina, Regent, and Anniversary. I'm looking for a table that has NOT been restored; I'm not trying to pay over 10k for a table.

I was would like to know the market value for an unrestored 10' snooker Kling, Arcade, and Anniversary. I've seen some online (eBay & craigslist) but they seem overpriced for the market, even if it's listed below it's appraised value. I'm located in Houston, but willing to travel. I appreciate any info or leads.

Thanks,
JC
Hi
I have a 5'x10' Arcade table. Attached are a few pictures of the table. Are you still in the market for one like this?

Attachments

  • Arcadian 1.webp
    Arcadian 1.webp
    131.8 KB · Views: 14
  • Arcadian 2.webp
    Arcadian 2.webp
    159 KB · Views: 14
  • Arcadian 3.webp
    Arcadian 3.webp
    113.6 KB · Views: 13

Fargo Rate - Not Much Math Here

Turns out I live in a rural area with a couple real small race to 2 or 3 weekly tournaments. I started getting them in the system a couple months ago. Every black-line rating here is a preliminary performance rating (no starter guess) based on an average of about 100 games.
Nobody but Vito here is established.

The light blue lines are the guesses I made before we started getting games in the system--just watching the players for 6 months or so.

I would say these preliminary ratings align pretty well with the subjective guesses. Michelle, with 83 games performing 79 points above my guess, is the farthest off.

Vito, by the way, is me: long story...
View attachment 866943

This is why I like Fargo, there is actual data instead of "I feel" or "I think" or "no way can..."

Fargo Rate - Not Much Math Here

I know plenty of APA 7/9's who can't run a rack in four tries, and most Fargo 300/350's I know have never run a rack. But I agree with the gist of your statement. When you start in any system, you go from "We know nothing about your play" to "This is all we know about your play". It takes a lot of play for any system to reliably say "This is how you play".

Edit.. I am replying to your reply which was not what I meant in my post LOL. You posted "run a rack in 4 tries" which seems to mean break and run, but I meant run a rack in 4 tries meaning 4 innings in a rack, not a 25% break and run rate.

There is no way a maxed-out APA player will not be able to run out a rack in under 4 innings most of the time with an open table. Not saying they will do so every single time, but most open table layouts for a 7/9 would be a one or two inning game, maybe 3 at times if it's not a 7-footer. It's just impossible to max out any league and not be able to run out well.

Fargo Rate - Not Much Math Here

FR isn’t reliable until robustness is over 200. Don’t sweat it until you are over 200.
200 games is way overboard. More like 40 or 50 should be sufficient in typical situations. [...]
Turns out I live in a rural area with a couple real small race to 2 or 3 weekly tournaments. I started getting them in the system a couple months ago. Every black-line rating here is a preliminary performance rating (no starter guess) based on an average of about 100 games.
Nobody but Vito here is established.

The light blue lines are the guesses I made before we started getting games in the system--just watching the players for 6 months or so.

I would say these preliminary ratings align pretty well with the subjective guesses. Michelle, with 83 games performing 79 points above my guess, is the farthest off.

Vito, by the way, is me: long story...
1764702351865.png

Filter

Back
Top