What would You do?
- By straightline
- Main Forum
- 109 Replies
Yes, it is the honorable thing to do.
No because fuk him.
Actually, it's a trap. There is no correct play.
Yes, it is the honorable thing to do.
Can you show us one? Bill was through with the 18 thread pin early with original Joss (East) cues in the late 60s.There are absolutely JW cues with a 5/16x18 pin.
Just curious: When starting a match, I’ve alway hit a couple of casual practice lags to gauge cloth & cushion speeds, before we get down for the ‘official’ LAG, and no one ever objected. Do pro tournaments now typically discourage or restrict that?
Yes, it is the honorable thing to do.Scenario: World Championship final, 50 point game, score tied at 49-49. Your opponent is at table and cuing the WRONG BALL. Do you tell them?
You can explain the reason for Your answer.
I've Never seen it done in this Exact example in 60 years!OK. Why? Your post didn’t address the question at all. You cited one clause of the rule after the word “or”. If you are right and the rule isn’t interpreted my way by the UMB, perhaps you should tell them to amend it.
It's either an oceanic formation, or a partial joint. Take your pick.I can see both sides of this BUT I have no idea what a reef is
The Olympics is a bunch of attention hogs trying to outdo each other. Pool is a bunch of neurotics hoping they outdo each other. Funny too that the Olympics are games and pool wants to be a sport.Plenty of sports don't have the Olympics as the pinnacle of their sport. I think that's actually the sign that a sport is healthy and financially viable.
It also makes sense to me that there would be a limited set of participants in the Olympics. This should be a showcase of the best each country has to offer, and there should be qualifiers or qualification criteria to whittle down the field BEFORE the Olympics.
For example, for the 100m sprint (probably the most popular event), only 56 runners participated. Given the number of runners in the world, this is obviously an incredibly select group of athletes, as it should be.
OK. Why? Your post didn’t address the question at all. You cited one clause of the rule after the word “or”. If you are right and the rule isn’t interpreted my way by the UMB, perhaps you should tell them to amend it.So, 'My' Actual experience in World 3C events isn't good enough for You! Ok.
The 'Interpretation' is bad!
I do play 3 cushion. Not well. As I said above, in the small tournaments I have played, most players would alert their opponent if they noticed. They might not notice. I know your accomplishments, but you should not use those accomplishments to support the logical fallacy of an appeal to authority. That is what you are doing in your post. I may be wrong. That’s why I asked. But I found, read, and cited the translation of the rule that appears on the UMB website. What you say does not seem to be what the rule says
That could mean several things. The rule could be poorly drafted and the UMB procedure and ref training is different from what the rule says. It could mean the translation from French to English is poor. It could be other rules address the situation. It could mean your experience varied from what the rule is. Or it could mean you are incorrect. Seeing an example from international play with a ref involved might help. If you know of them, tell me/ us. I’m not trying to be difficult, I ASKED. And your response is not an actual answer, it is a classic logical fallacy.
Nice video. I like the look of the table with the new rails. As a fan of professional pool, one thing I really don't like about the more parallel facings, is how there seems to be more balls hung up in the pocket than back when Gold Crowns were the standard. This makes the penalty for a miss even more severe. The incoming player shoots at a lot of hung balls in today's game. Is that a good thing? It keeps the game moving, but removes a bit of variety.
I wonder if buying new custom rails will become more of a thing. They really are the most important part of the table. I would consider some for mine.
Am I crazy, or do I correctly recall AZ's Neil (RIP), somehow extending the slate shelves on his table? That would be an interesting project to change the TDF of a table. Interesting for someone else that is.
There are absolutely JW cues with a 5/16x18 pin.Asian import. Bill did not make any cue with a 5/16 X 18 pin. Bumper is also wrong.
So, 'My' Actual experience in World 3C events isn't good enough for You! Ok.I do play 3 cushion. Not well. As I said above, in the small tournaments I have played, most players would alert their opponent if they noticed. They might not notice. I know your accomplishments, but you should not use those accomplishments to support the logical fallacy of an appeal to authority. That is what you are doing in your post. I may be wrong. That’s why I asked. But I found, read, and cited the translation of the rule that appears on the UMB website. What you say does not seem to be what the rule says
That could mean several things. The rule could be poorly drafted and the UMB procedure and ref training is different from what the rule says. It could mean the translation from French to English is poor. It could be other rules address the situation. It could mean your experience varied from what the rule is. Or it could mean you are incorrect. Seeing an example from international play with a ref involved might help. If you know of them, tell me/ us. I’m not trying to be difficult, I ASKED. And your response is not an actual answer, it is a classic logical fallacy.