Table Difficulty Factor (TDF) for measuring table "toughness"
- By dr_dave
- Main Forum
- 1080 Replies
You're delusional if you think a 7' Diamond Pro-Am with Pro-Cut pockets is only .05 harder to play on than a 9' GC4 with factory pockets (not doctored like the Shaw table).
I know your contributions to pool are great, but this was a bad starting point, and you never fixed it.
Go play 200 racks of 9 ball ghost on each table. Count total balls pocketed across all games. 1 ball = 1 point. No bs like an extra bonus for running the rack. I'll donate 3,000 USD to the BEF if you get a better score on the 9' GC than the 7' Diamond. If you don't, you change your formula.
Won't find a better deal than that.
Edit: apply the TDF correction factor to the number of balls pocketed, not the 9' being outright more balls than the 7'.
Sounds like a fun challenge. I doubt I can find the time for it, but I will try. If not, hopefully others will give it a try and report their results here.