Need help tracking down vintage materials for a cue.

Finished up with the bowling ball material. I read up a little bit and some bowling balls have a phenolic outer layer, but not sure what this old ball is. I will say it cut and worked nicely.

Don't judge the rest of the cue too badly. It's an experiment all and all, making adjustments to equipment and techniques.
That cue turned out awesome. Helluva good job dude!

Predator Men's 10 Ball JAX

Anyone else noticed that Filler seems to play a bit different than before? Stays longer down on the shot than before on average, does tiny head movements on most shots while down and the stroke length seems more cautious. Probably tinkering with his technique?

yes, he's been trying to fix something that's not broken. even asked darren appleton on advice for his cue action. madness..

Why You Choke Easy Shots Under Pressure

I believe my edited post covers what the fear is of, fear of failure, of losing, of what others will think of you if you choke, under perform, lose, or be the cause of a loss in a team sport environment.

Years ago I had in depth conversation with a Sports Psychologist who had worked with many athletes of multiple sports. Both youthful ones and adult professional athletes. He said that the number one issue he has dealt with from those that seek his services is very talented athletes who, while talented athletes at whatever their choice of sport, their practice game does not transfer to their competition game. That in practice they perform flawlessly, but falter in competition. He stated in that every case, the athletes themselves felt that for some reason they couldn’t determine, “they cave under the pressure of competition”. He said that in every instance, when questioning them about it, found that the root cause was FEAR. Fear of losing, of failure, of how others will think of them, their peers, their family, in team sports their teammates or coaches, fear of letting them down.

He stated that the method of solving their issues is not the ability to give them some magical advice to help them to overcome it. But that it was in guiding a conversation, a discussion with them, therapy if you will. To get them to reveal how they “feel” in practice where they perform well and to the full abilities they have developed over years of dedication. Then getting them to discuss how the “feel” when in competition and are underperforming.

To let them identify the difference, that it’s better when they can describe it themselves, that difference. He said that almost to a person, most describe their practice or preparation as being “fun”. But that prior to competition, and once competition starts, they don’t describe it as being fun. That some throw up beforehand, they’re nervous, jittery, overly conscious of “what lies at stake”, if they underperform or fail, or choke.

That once he gets them to verbalize the difference in how they feel, he can help them understand that there’s truly no difference between practice and competition. That they’ve put in the time, they’ve honed their abilities. That the fact that they can perform flawlessly in practice, indicates they have the necessary skills to compete. To understand that the difference is their perception in those situations. That in practice they are focused on the process, not a result, as there is nothing at stake. But that in competition, there’s now something “at stake”. They become focused on “the result”, because it’s important to them, it’s why they spent years developing their skills. That this change in perspective, in focusing on the result, instead of the process, is why their game in competition never matches that of their practice game. To teach them that it is natural to feel “pregame nerves”, that it’s their body preparing them to perform because their body understands it’s important to them. To understand, that like I said in my last post, that it’s just body chemistry, and that there is no difference in the brains chemistry when excited or when afraid, that the difference is you’re breathing and relaxed when excited. But in moments of fear, your breathing is shallow, halting, that you’re tense. You lose sight of process because you’re focused on the result. That ultimately, you have to learn to let go, to embrace it and trust in your skills that you have developed. To have fun, the reason you started playing in the first place.
Sounds superficially correct; except maybe sub the word rehearsal for practice. I think too many jocks are trapped in "play like you practice.". Maybe they figure the ghost is practice. It's more a run through drill, Hardly a rehearsal even. The biggest difference between anything you can do by yourself and a real match is the _other guy_; his psyche infused into your sanctuary. Works both ways but the case studies have the issues.
I believe what happens is the conflict of wills. The chemical imbalances are physical manifestations and not the source; certainly not the reason.

Predator's WPA Women's World 9 Ball

I agree and appreciate that you brought up Sofia Mast, whose game is probably the slightest bit ahead of Savannah's, and who just doesn't have as much social media presence. But I do think you undersell Savannah quite a bit.

Two years ago, Savannah was a 13-year-old girl playing like a stronger-than-average league player. She had a social media presence and therefore was getting herself well-known, but she was a curiosity, particularly since there are so few girls that age who even know which end of the cue to hold. In the past two years she has forced herself (yes, along with Sofia) into the conversation for being the top American-born female player going. That is not by any stretch of the imagination a modest rate of progress, that is an unbelievably accelerated level of progress, especially since she only started taking the game seriously, what, 3-4 years ago?

And every time I see her play, she has gotten clearly better and developed multiple aspects of her game. She is playing as much as anyone, and as focused on improving as anyone. Yes, she has to get a lot better to realistically compete for a world title, and the way these things go who knows if she might stall out. But she is not behind anyone in terms of potential. Comparing her with Jean Balukas and Siming Chen, two women who might have claim to the title of greatest female player of all time, is grossly unfair. So is comparing her accomplishments at 15 with just a handful of others' at ages 16-19, which is eons developmentally speaking. Take any of the top-20 women in the world. At the ages of 15, where were their games at?

Finally, judging her based on her Fargo, which is weighted down by literally thousands of games from a year ago when she was nowhere near the player she was today, and thousands more (yes, at a lesser impact) from two years ago when she wouldn't win a typical league's top shooter award, is again missing her rapid ascent. She is 680+ in current play-level ability. And, again, she is only 15.

Fast-forward 10 years. Who is most likely to be among the top-20 female players in the world? Savannah is way, way up there in my estimate, moreso than any 35+ year-old who is likely on the (albeit, elongated and slow) downward slope, and even more than any 25-35 year-old player who isn't already there whose game has most likely peaked. The most likely thing to stop her from being internationally competitive is if the money just isn't there--if adding her tournament winnings and anything she gets off social media and endorsements still doesn't equate to what a steady job brings in.
Thanks for your input. This is a well-reasoned and well-presented post. I agree that Savannah, who will be sixteen in seven weeks, is improving and I wish her well. Perhaps she will go on to be a great player, but she is not yet threatening the most elite players and many of the greatest young female phenoms already were at that age.

That said, I was already watching women's pro pool in the 1970s and have probably attended nearly 100 WPBA events live in my life. I have a lot of observation upon which to base my contention that her rate of progress is not as great as what I'm used to seeing from those that go on to be the greatest champions. I mentioned Jean Balukas, Loree Jon Jones, Siming Chen, Han Yu, and Jasmin Ouschan all did major damage on the international circuit as teens. So did Sha Sha Liu, World 9ball champion at 16. Prior to the existence of the WPBA, California's Robin Dodson won two Caifornia State championships as a teen. Cheka Centeno probably played Fargo 725 speed as a teen. Ga Young Kim was already posting wins against the world's most elite players as a teen, too.

The last two notable American teen phenoms were in the 2010s. They were Briana Miller and April Larson, both of whom were very capable cueists posting some solid results by age 17. Neither went on to be a superstar in women's pool, although both play nicely (Briana is #51 and April is #57).

As for your suggestion that the Top 20 today weren't great players at Savannah's age, you are mistaken. It simply means that you do not follow the women's pro game very closely. Looking at a few of them, a) Siming Chen was world champ at 16, b) Han Yu was already winning majors by 17, c) Sha Sha Liu was World champion by 16, d) Jasmin Ouschan was already one of the world's best 9ball and 14.1 players at 16, e) Kristina Tkach won three Eurotour events by 17. Most of the top female players were already doing a lot of damage on the tournament scene in their teens.

Once upon a time, it was America that produced the world's best female players, but now it is Asia. Much has been written of the superb training academies for women's pool players in Asia and how they keep mass producing superstar players. Asia has 34 of the Fargo Top 50 women and not even one of the other 16 is American born. There is little doubt in my mind that both Savannah and Sofia will change this, but if you ask me if I convinced that either will be a Top 20 player in the world down the road, I will say no. I expect that the Asian training machine to continue producing the giants of the game with a sizable contingent from Europe, but for now, I'm not convinced that America is going to produce its share of the world's best women players. Of course, it is quite possible I am wrong here and I will be rooting for both Savannah and Sofia every step of the way.

To sum, I agree with you that Savannah is progressing, but I am in a position to compare that rate of progress to that of the many female teen phenoms that I have watched over fifty years. It is my considered opinion that Savannah's progress is slow compared to what I've seen from those that went on to be the giants of women's pool.

Of course, the bottom line here is that I've been wrong before and will be wrong again, so we'll see how it all develops.

Filter

Back
Top