Justin Bergman is on a mission

remember when no one said a computer could ever beat the top chess players. it came in almost no time after that.
Technology hates final words.


If there was incentive to do it an AI pool player could exist in less than five years. Ever growing lack of incentive might keep robot pool players at bay or some of the whiz kids at MIT or a similar place may do it for a class project. It may have already been done.

We will see more advances in technology in the next five to ten years than we have seen in the last twenty. I think of my brother sometimes, a very high level genius who died in the early seventies. He never saw the completion of the interstate system, a microwave, a home computer, ... Somebody else worked on a high level military computer. If it was down thirty minutes the Pentagon called to find out why. It had logic gates that were about three by five inches that you could flip open to fix! The ten meg hard drives were the size of a big file cabinet and the individual disks were the size of 78 LP's! Roughly twelve inches. Won't be long before almost nobody knows what a hard drive is. I need to read some DVD's right now, me or nobody in my family has equipment that can read one! Thirty years ago I could have taught how to work on computers and networks, at any level. Now I am happy if I can just turn this damned thing on!

About Jennie, anybody that wants in a grammar or typing battle with somebody that used to transcribe reams of documents for the United Nations, often from recordings of broken English to proper spelling and grammar, and on a rush basis, ain't going to get my backing! She seems to be semi retired now but I suspect she can still type over three hundred words a minute, no flaws!

From what I read from AI, I can still spell and have better grammar than most programs. Some of the stuff I wrote for bids going to NASA would probably look like AI to a lot of people today. A lot of the reason I am so verbose, the request for bids specified nobody would get any follow-up contacts, no questions, no requests for clarifications, you got it right the first time, or it got round filed. To make things tougher, the requests for bids had errors and you couldn't ask for clarification concerning those errors either!

Hu

Another stupid thread from me: golf is harder than pool

Golf courses have elemental variables. Billiard tables are pristine controlled environments. That alone is worth talking about.
All respect to you but for you to say that billiard tables are in "pristine controlled environments" you have never experienced playing in Puerto Vallarta,Mx or most of the other cities in Mexico where there are no windows,no ac, 90 degrees, on a mild day with 95% humidity (sometimes you can see the condensation coming off of a rolling ball, wet chalk, crooked house cues,some with no tips. a mud cue ball ( if you happen to draw the ball more than a foot you are considered a pool god and are closely watched) not to mention the mostly Dynamo tables that were worn out 30 years ago with a 30 watt bare light bulb hanging somewhere on a wall 20 ft away or you have never played in any of the bars in Houston,tx with dirt floors & tables that are pushed out of the way to make room for a dance floor when the band shows up !
The golf courses in Mexico are "pristine" compared to most of the pool playing facilities there, Jus'Sayn' !

Another Cueball Training Device/Product!!

Ron the Pool Student used the Tunnel Trainer (supposed to be 2 5/16" diameter) found it an easy method to detect deflection differences produced by different shafts. The shaft he was used to, a Z3, sent cue balls through the trainer while Jacoby V3 and V4 knicked or knocked over the trainer (greater deflection) until he practice a hundred balls (<HAMB) to readjust.
You can get much more useful results by shooting straight at an object ball. Leave the cue ball spinning in place. How far the cue ball moves to the side tells you how far off you were from perfect.

Filter

Back
Top