Cornerman said:

I'll be clearer. I've seen just as many slow mo videos as anyone else. There is at least one video that it isn't clear at all if the 4-ball was hit first, and it looks like the 8-ball may have been hit first in that video. We literally cannot see the contact point since it's on the other side of the 8-ball. This is why refereess are trained at looking at the cueball path. Unless someone can give me a better analysis on where physics say the cueball would go on a bad hit vs good hit, the cueball path tells me the 4-ball was hit last as it followed the 4-ball tangent and not the 8-ball tangent.

Click to expand...

loggerhead12 said:

Sharivari did a good job with the breakdown.

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

sjm said:

Of course. A thread was started about a still unidentified player beating a regional action player known to a few in a game not identified in a place not identified. That's great information. More threads like this one please!

Click to expand...