trustyrusty said:I really dislike the different eras (in any competition) comparisons, so I'm gonna throw a monkey wrench in it all. Mosconi vs. Ben Hogan or Byron Nelson, and John Schmidt vs. Tiger ... which is the closer matchup?
BTW, John I was in the AZB room for you and Corey's tries at the 1P challenge, and from what I saw you were both really good guys with INCREDIBLE games - I would fair much better against you two on the links![]()
Don't sweat the "not in the same league" stuff...one generation said Nicklaus wouldn't hold a candle to Bobby Jones, and Nicklaus' generation thinks he woulda won more if he had the golfball and club technologies that Tiger is enjoying etc. Numbers are just numbers (many things affect records in different eras), great players in their own times are GREAT players PERIOD
This is close to what I was gonna say. Look at Tiger today. He is probably known as a super hero golfer with all the titles and awards. I can guarantee you that Ben Hogan, or even Jack Nicklaus could stick em close and roll em in just as good if not better than Tiger.
When talking about who is the best in reference to generations is not going to be accurate when someone of the 'modern' era wasn't part of the 'older' era.
Someone like Jay is going to give an accurate comparison because he was there, and still his here today. He saw Ronnie Allen and Efren. He also saw Mosconi and Schmidt. Anyone else who fits in this category is fit to give an opinion on this subject. My guess is, you would have to be 50+??
Don't take that the wrong way fellas.
My overall opinion in all of this, is why can't we appreciate all of the good players of the past and not try and say this guy is the best, or this guy is better than that guy. We are always trying to be 'Consumers Report' for everything because we are so particular and like everything our way.
I would like to see everyone in this post congratulate Mosconi (including John) and any other respectable player of the past. I would also like to see the Mosconi fans give John the respect that he deserves and move on recognizing that John Schmidt's, Danny Harriman's or any other moder player's career is far from over. Who knows what we'll see in pool over the next 20 years? Maybe we'll see a run of 1000? Maybe there will be a player who makes the cue ball explode on the break? Maybe there will be a player who just NEVER MISSES?
Last edited: