Keep the cue as representative of his work. No need for a second chance to make it right. It should never have gone out that way.
I think you're missing the point. Have you seen the cue to know what's being referred to? I haven't and I don't want to because it's about expectations.
If you haven't seen the cue, aren't you jumping the gun a bit?
You're certainly entitled to your opinion but what's up with the 'no second chances'? That's pretty damning from someone who doesn't have a stake in the transaction.
I think you're missing the point. Have you seen the cue to know what's being referred to? I haven't and I don't want to because it's about expectations.
If you haven't seen the cue, aren't you jumping the gun a bit?
You're certainly entitled to your opinion but what's up with the 'no second chances'? That's pretty damning from someone who doesn't have a stake in the transaction.
what prompted this question is athat it
has happened to me 2 times, and both times I worked it out with the cuemaker. I just think that maybe that was a mistake. I think that by sending me that cue he was well aware of every problem and was hoping that I would just let it go by...I dont see any other reason. That seems to me to be sort of a slap in my face at the end of the day. Was just thinkiong about it and was wondering what your opinions were on something like this
Steve
No,... I think you're missing the point. I believe that if Steve says it's a piece.... then it's a piece. This cuemaker knows who he was selling the cue to. Are you going to sell a cue to a serious collector ( or anyone else for that matter ) and let a piece of crap go out the door. C'mon, wake up now................ That's my damning opinion.
Then I'd say that the difference of opinion is btwn. Steve & the builder.
Not you, not me or anyone else in the peanut gallery.
You haven't seen the cue or it's alleged flaws yet you're basing an opinion on hearsay only. That's the 'mob mentality' I was referring to.
I don't sell to collectors and have no desire to do so. I have no interest in that market whatsoever. My cues are built for players, not collectors.
However, nothing goes out my door unless in my mind that it's the best work I can offer for the price the client is willing to pay.
I'll be honest to say that I'm not capable of building $4,000/5,000 cues.
I currently build cues in the $1,000 and under price range and the 'players' who own them are quite pleased with their purchase.
I agree, the CM did know who he was selling to and I'll venture a guess that he put his heart & soul into the building of the cue. Unfortunately, his best efforts weren't enough to meet expectations. Can I go back to sleep now?
Steve,
Could it be that his skill level just wasn't what you expected or what he is capable of?
I actually had this happen. I called the cue maker and we had a nice conversation on the phone. I told him I was going to return the cue for a refund it was not up to the quality I was lead to believe. In the course of the conversation we talked about cues and he told me some of the problems he was having trying to learn the craft. This was before the internet and in the time of all cuemaking was a big secret. Long story short, he was very apologetic and said the last thing he wanted was a bad reputation before he even had a chance to get started. The punch line here, he is now a guy you will have to wait years to get a cue from and it will cost you an arm and a leg. Everybody has to start somewhere but hopefully the cue maker doesn't have such an ego they can't see their own short comings and learn from them.If I were to buy a cue from one of you and the workmanship was terrible....I mean inlays out of line, terrible finish, lousy inlay work etc........ What do you think is the best way to handle that. It seems to me that there are 2 options that make sense.
first would be to send it back and tell whoever made it, that it has all these problems. And expect to get it back as soon as possible, completely fixed. whatever it takes. That seems to me to be the best for everyone, but it also may not be the right thing.
The second choice is to assume that a cuemaker knows damn well what he is sending out, and doesnt have enough self esteem or integrity to realize that this cue is representing HIS ability. So where the first choice is the kinder, easier way to correct the problem. The second might be more of what he deserves for not caring enough............
What do you guys think of this.....not trying to start any fights. just wondering what you think
Steve
I'd like to add/admit,
I never made a perfect Cue Cap..Never will..
Always something screwed up..No mater how much I try..
Too much things to control...
Dust, pits, white spots (Remember "Murphy's law"), equipment, flaws in materials....And, me!!:sorry:
Cue Caps is a loser business...But, they do give a nice touch to the cue..:wink:
So, if I'm destant to go out of business, that's O.K. No money in cue caps.
(I made more serving Coffee part time... Amazing, yea??)..
Cuemaker's make perfect Caps... But, might cost double to price.
Steve, this is in no disrespect to you or refering to you..
Just my life story.and a good post to tell everyone.
Alton
Yes, I know, It ain't a "Ask the Cue CapMaker" section..
what prompted this question is athat it
has happened to me 2 times, and both times I worked it out with the cuemaker. I just think that maybe that was a mistake. I think that by sending me that cue he was well aware of every problem and was hoping that I would just let it go by...I dont see any other reason. That seems to me to be sort of a slap in my face at the end of the day. Was just thinkiong about it and was wondering what your opinions were on something like this
Steve