I have this way of looking at things, such as what's wrong, what's broke, what's not quite right, and what can be done to fix it. When I look at pool on a Professional level, I ask myself, what is it that defines a "Professional" pool player? If I hear of someone trying to promote a pool tournament billed as "Pro's" only...who decided who the "Pro's" are for that pool tournament?...or when a tournament is "No Pro's allowed"...who are they calling "Pro"? And in defining a "Pro", wouldn't it also make sense to define "Semi-Pro"? Isn't there some kind of line that should have to be crossed in order to be labeled a "Pro"? I don't think there is one pool player today that would object to having to take a skill level test in order to cross that line into the ranks of the "Pro's"...I think they'd support it 100% because for the first time in the history of this game....it would be looked at as a sport, because when the day comes that not just anyone can stand up and say...I'm a "Pro"....that day to me, will mean something. Instead, today we allow for the most part, anyone with an entry fee to play in pool tournaments because in order to raise money to make the pool tournaments more profitable for the winners...you need donations, but in creating a donation field of players, races to the finish line are backed off in order to give them "donors" a chance at the money as well as just about anyone else in the tournament, which to me is nothing more than a handicapping system in itself, because everyone knows the longer the race, the less chance the weaker player has of wining. 
So, in all these years of this game of pool that we all so much love to play, have we NOT created a ladder system that separates the masses into the levels of play that they truly are at? To me, my feelings of a "Pro" is that that player is in a group of players that ONLY a certain few players on earth can reach, a level of playing that most players can only dream of being at, but...how do we as a society do that...elevate these so called "Pro's" to that level of "Professional"?
Take bank pool for example. If there was ONE pool tournament that was held ONCE a year, to decide the best of the best bank pool players on planet earth...how would you decide who got to play in this world event? By running qualifier tournament play offs? Not in my way of looking at things, nope. 
I think that if everyone that wanted to play in this "WORLD" event, then everyone in the world that thought they had a chance should be given that chance, BUT only be allowed to play at that level in which they truly play, meaning if you're only an amateur player, then play in the amateur world playoffs...
If everyone that wanted to take part in this world event had to take a test first to see where they qualify, and the test consisted of 200 stokes, excluding the break, how many balls would a person bank by the end of them 200 strokes..........or how many strokes does it take to bank 50 balls within 2 hours? My way of thinking, is that you'd have a total separation of players to the point that if you drew a line under the top 128 highest banking scores...you'd have defined the "Pro's" of the world for this event, and all those that fell short would fall in place on the skill ladder as "Semi-Pro"..."Advanced"..."Amateur"...and would play for a world championship accordingly
 
Glen