The way it really went down

Status
Not open for further replies.
junior718 said:
Well.... I for one would never gamble with someone that owes me money. What happens if he beats you? How sick would you be? I must collect before I gamble with that man. As for me and you I dont think we can match up correctly. I know you got huge knowledge of one pocket and I dont. And I most likely need some weight in rotation games. I dont think I can play you any game even on a pooltable.
Click to expand...

I guess that's what makes the world go round. If I feel an interest in something worth pursuing I will try to keep communications open, regardless if the person owes me money or not. I also feel that if mistakes were made previously then all I need to do is make the necessary adjustments and go back at it. I wouldn't cut off my nose if I didn't like my face. And in my pursuit of something like that, if I happen to lose i'll probably go back at it again. Maybe if I lose enough I might get the money that was owed to me.;)
 
How much exactly did the Samoan cost. You'd have to believe you can add a little to the top for having to pay for that.

I heard through the grape vine that Incy also had the Samoan pay a visit to Dippy's grandkids. Thats just low.
 
wincardona said:
I guess that's what makes the world go round. If I feel an interest in something worth pursuing I will try to keep communications open, regardless if the person owes me money or not. I also feel that if mistakes were made previously then all I need to do is make the necessary adjustments and go back at it. I wouldn't cut off my nose if I didn't like my face. And in my pursuit of something like that, if I happen to lose i'll probably go back at it again. Maybe if I lose enough I might get the money that was owed to me.;)
Click to expand...



LOL!!! thats 1 way to get paid back. LOL

too funny Billy. I respect that
 
junior718 said:
LOL!!! thats 1 way to get paid back. LOL

too funny Billy. I respect that
Click to expand...

Now we're talking. It's like the old adage that says, "Keep your friends close and your enemies closer." This applies in business as well. ;)
 
Ha! Caught you in a spelling error!

JAM said:
As an aside, has anybody ever heard of a "cur" [ph]? It's a term used in the Episcopal church. The sentence goes like this: "The assistant rector slept in the cur."

TIA for any and all responses. This job I'm on is a bear! :angry:
Click to expand...


JAM,

I think I've caught you in a spelling error! It ain't cur like a dog, It's a keer like you have to keep gas and oil in if you want to drive it down the road.

I can see that my career as a transcriptionist wouldn't last out the first project before my sense of humor got me retired which ain't the same as tired again or putting fresh tires on your keer.

Hu
 
Bishop said:
You'd just have it roughed up? Your Incardonaisms are as ridiculous as the original post in this thread.
Click to expand...

Oh I see your back with us again today, in spite of how you feel about our perspectives on things. I'm surprised you're not playing some big chess game with some guru, satisfying your inner feelings about proper behavior.;)
 
Last edited:
mlalum said:
Chicken you really don't know anything. You really ought to tone it down. this is serious business and you have nothing at stake in the slightest.
Click to expand...

mlalum:

With all due respect, and to clarify for you what this means; it is respect that you actually deserve; I have noticed a theme in many of your forum postings. Generally, you are a heavily opinionated, pot-stirring, antagonist. A bitter fellow and a real p-r-i-c-k-l-y pear.

Recently, I have seen you breaking KYboys balls over his avatar which you didn't like, Lenny for how he handled himself over the Grady Matthews Arizona visit, now you're breaking my balls because you don't like me sharing my opinions, and next you are breaking JAM's balls, er...uh, you know what I mean, because you don't like that she is supportive of Billy Incardona's comments. And your ice-breaker over the latter was a snide remark asking if they're the same person when you knew otherwise. I guess if we don't post within the guidelines of what you consider agreeable, then we should keep our opinions to ourselves, right?

Probably, you don't find it ironic that someone as opinionated as yourself seldom misses an opportunity to criticize others trying to offer up their views. I'm not talking about friendly debate, it's the mean-spirited condescending remarks that I take exception to.

Best,
Brian kc
 
Last edited:
junior718 said:
I have been reading thru and didn't see anything about a speaker phone. I must have missed it. I definetly missed the meeting up part. I'm not choosing sides. Didnt say if anyone was wrong or right. I appologize to you if you thought I was saying anyone was wrong. I guess its kinda hard to keep up with so many posts. But if there was no speaker phone (which I thought), then yes it is hearsay. It doesn't matter Jay's reputation or not. Nothing against Jay.
Click to expand...


It was kind of strange how this happened. I called Billy on his cell phone and he answered and said wait just a minute. Now I hear him talking on his land line and at first have no idea who he is talking to. As I listen and hear Billy say Dave a couple of times it dawns on me who it is. Intermittently the speaker phone goes off and on (at least it sounded like it since I could hear Viffer talking). Why I have no idea. But I was privy to some of the more revealing parts of their call. Viffer distinctly said he wasn't paying after Billy offered to settle for half. Billy told Viffer that he was done with it after this phone call, but he couldn't speak for Scott. By the way I heard EVERYTHING Billy said to Viffer. Let's just say it was a very enlightening conversation, since I did not know all the details prior to this.

I listened to them talk for at least twenty minutes before the cell phone went dead, and Billy was ever the diplomat and sounded like a high priced attorney trying to work out a deal. He never raised his voice and kept his humor about him while trying his best to communicate with someone who was sometimes irrational, often illogical and in the end totally obstinate. I give Billy high marks for how he handled himself in that conversation. He was nothing less than brilliant, without success. It was like he was debating with a rock. And a dumb rock at that. :confused:

Bottom line, this entire conversation was never about whether Viffer had paid or not paid Scott. Viffer was not trying to sell that bull to Billy, as he is on here. It was all about what to do about the remaining unpaid balance of 50K plus the 10K for the truck. Viffer continually refused all options to settle amicably.

P.S. I don't think it's considered hearsay if I actually hear both parties talking. Am I wrong about this? What I suspect was happening was that Billy was moving the phone away from his ear (and closer to the cell phone) so I could hear what Viffer was saying. When he had the phone against his ear, I couldn't hear as well.
 
Last edited:
Kickin' Chicken said:
mlalum:

With all due respect, and to clarify for you what this means; it is respect that you actually deserve; I have noticed a theme in many of your forum postings. Generally, you are a heavily opinionated pot-stirrer and antagonist. A bitter fellow and a real *****ly-pear.

Recently, I have seen you breaking KYboys balls over his avatar which you didn't like, Lenny for how he handled himself over the Grady Matthews Arizona visit, now you're breaking my balls because you don't like me sharing my opinions, and next you are breaking JAM's balls, er...uh, you know what I mean, because you don't like that she is supportive of Billy Incardona's comments. And your ice-breaker over the latter is a snide remark asking if they're the same person when you know otherwise. I guess if we don't post within the guidelines of what you consider agreeable, then we should keep our opinions to ourselves, right?

Probably, you don't find it ironic that someone as opinionated as yourself seldom misses an opportunity to criticize others trying to offer their views. I'm not talking about friendly debate, it's the mean-spirited condescending remarks.

Best,
Brian kc
Click to expand...

Hey that's funny, the auto-editor edited out P-R-I-C-K-L-Y pear. :grin-square:

Best,
Brian kc
 
JAM said:
Now we're talking. It's like the old adage that says, "Keep your friends close and your enemies closer." This applies in business as well. ;)
Click to expand...

Are you sure you're not me? That's something that I could of said. Anyways that's a good idea, when two people just gets hooked up no sense rushing into divorce court, right? surely we can work out our differences.:grin-square:
 
due respect !

Kickin' Chicken said:
mlalum:

With all due respect, and to clarify for you what this means; it is respect that you actually deserve; I have noticed a theme in many of your forum postings. Generally, you are a heavily opinionated pot-stirrer and antagonist. A bitter fellow and a real *****ly-pear.

Recently, I have seen you breaking KYboys balls over his avatar which you didn't like, Lenny for how he handled himself over the Grady Matthews Arizona visit, now you're breaking my balls because you don't like me sharing my opinions, and next you are breaking JAM's balls, er...uh, you know what I mean, because you don't like that she is supportive of Billy Incardona's comments. And your ice-breaker over the latter is a snide remark asking if they're the same person when you know otherwise. I guess if we don't post within the guidelines of what you consider agreeable, then we should keep our opinions to ourselves, right?

Probably, you don't find it ironic that someone as opinionated as yourself seldom misses an opportunity to criticize others trying to offer their views. I'm not talking about friendly debate, it's the mean-spirited condescending remarks.

Best,
Brian kc
Click to expand...

on KC's behalf here is that due respect !

2889_75670451831_516591831_1596970_485961_n.jpg
 
I love how this guy acts like he wouldn't cut off his nose despite his face...and he's so reasonable and gentlemanly so we should empathize with him because everyone deserves the benefit on the doubt if its in the best interest of parties involved. So rest easy good friends Uncle Incy's looking out for ya. He'd go so far as to engage in additional wagering so as to not bite that hand that feeds him.

With that said how long was it before your party sent the muscle in to collect the debt?

How long did you let this guy cool off from your sharking before activating operation thug life?

How mature was it to not seek remediation on private terms?

Your inability to close a deal is everyone's fault but your own. Right? I think you love to hear yourself talk...ahem love to read what you write so you took it public because it was the right thing to do (enormousrollingeyes).

This guy loves basking in your glow for his self loving gloss. You guys want to crown his ass then crown his ass but how many times is this guy gonna run all over himself for the sake of good sounding ego boosting AZ conversation.
 
ShootingArts said:
JAM,

I think I've caught you in a spelling error! It ain't cur like a dog, It's a keer like you have to keep gas and oil in if you want to drive it down the road.

I can see that my career as a transcriptionist wouldn't last out the first project before my sense of humor got me retired which ain't the same as tired again or putting fresh tires on your keer.

Hu
Click to expand...

LOL! I've had more terms in this job that I've never heard. I'm going to be up all night. Vicar, cur [ph], diaconate, ordans, Sursum Corda, et cetera. I really need to find this "cur" word because it keeps coming up. :(
 
Bill like so many pros that have come to this forum, you will realize your wasting your time and stop posting.
Regards,
Bob
 
wincardona said:
Are you sure you're not me? That's something that I could of said. Anyways that's a good idea, when two people just gets hooked up no sense rushing into divorce court, right? surely we can work out our differences.:grin-square:
Click to expand...

That's a fact. When there's affairs of the heart issues dragged out in a courtroom, the only one who comes out on top is the lawyer. If people could work things out beforehand, it would solve a lot of problems down the road. Right, JAM? :grin-square:
 
wincardona said:
Oh I see your back with us again today, in spite of how you feel about our perspectives on things. I'm surprised you're not playing some big chess game with some guru, satisfying your inner feelings about proper behavior.;)
Click to expand...
You didn't respond to my offer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top